Date |
Text |
2020-12-09 14:34:26 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| |
| 1.) RESPONSES TO SECTION 94-35(C), SITE DESIGN |
| QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE MISSING FROM THE |
| APPLICATION. PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| |
| 2.) THE LOCATION MAP ON THE SURVEY IS INCORRECT. PLEASE |
| ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| |
| |
| MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHEET MP-1): |
| |
| 1.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE MASTER |
| DEVELOPMENT PLAN: A) THE LAND USE AND ZONING TO THE |
| WEST IS C AND CPD (NOT CS AND CS). B) THE FOLLOWING |
| USES HAVE BEEN "APPROVED" (NOT "PROPOSED"): TRACT #3: |
| MOTOR VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE AND TRACT #4 |
| SELF-STORAGE FACILITY. C) PLEASE CHANGE THE PROPOSED |
| USE FOR TRACT #2 FROM "CAR WASH" TO "CAR WASH |
| (SELF-SERVICE)" FOR ACCURACY. |
| |
| 2.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE MASTER |
| DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE AS-BUILTS |
| AND/OR THE TPS LETTER: A) TRACT #2: PROPOSED CAR WASH |
| (SELF-SERVICE): 3,708 SQUARE FEET (NOT 3,725 SQUARE |
| FEET). B) TRACT #3: NEW CAR SALES: 14,683 SQUARE FEET |
| (VESTED IN TPS; NOT 14,709 SQUARE FEET). C) TRACT #4: |
| SELF-STORAGE FACILITY: 111,502 SQUARE FEET (NOT 115,000 |
| SQUARE FEET). |
| |
| 3.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE LAND USE AND |
| ZONING INFORMATION AND NOTES FOR TRACT #2 (CAR WASH |
| (SELF-SERVICE): A) BUILDING HEIGHT INFORMATION IS |
| INCONSISTENT WITH THE HEIGHT IN THE ARCHITECTURAL |
| PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. B) DATA PROVIDED |
| FOR: IMPERVIOUS AREA, OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPING SEEMS |
| TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE DATA PROVIDED IN THE SITE |
| PLAN FOR THE CAR WASH. PLEASE CHECK CALCULATIONS AND |
| ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. C) NUMBERS PROVIDED FOR: |
| IMPERVIOUS AREA, OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPING SEEMS TO BE |
| INCONSISTENT WITH THE DATA PROVIDED IN THE MASTER PLAN |
| |
| 4.) ADJUST THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION FOR TRACT #3: NEW |
| CAR SALES FOR BUILDING AREA: UP TO 14,683 SF-GFA + 26 |
| SF FOR EQUIPMENT ROOM AND ASSOCIATED PARKING (TO |
| CLARIFY THE 14,709 SQUARE FEET BUILDING). |
| |
| 5.) TOTAL BUILDING SIZE FOR TRACT #3 (NEW CAR SALES) |
| SHALL ALSO BE CHANGED TO REFLECT THE ABOVE (TO CLARIFY |
| THE 14,709 SQUARE FEET BUILDING SIZE AND VESTED |
| BUILDING IN THE TPS LETTER). |
| |
| |
| SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| |
| 1.) WHEN THE DEL TACO SITE PLAN WAS APPROVED FOR THE |
| CPD, AN ADA ACCESS POINT CONNECTING THE SIDEWALK ON |
| BELVEDERE ROAD TO THE INTERIOR PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION |
| WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT/RESTAURANT WAS REQUIRED BY THE |
| BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THIS IS NO LONGER DEPICTED IN THE |
| PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR THE CAR WASH. THE BUILDING |
| OFFICIAL SHALL DETERMINE IF AN ADA CONNECTION IS |
| REQUIRED |
| |
| 2.) THE LOCATION MAP PROVIDED ON SHEET A1.0 IS |
| INCORRECT. PLEASE CORRECT FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| |
| 3.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE PROJECT DATA |
| TABULAR: A) THE BUILDING HEIGHT INFORMATION IS |
| INACCURATE WITH THE BUILDING HEIGHT PROVIDED IN THE |
| ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| |
| 4.) WHERE IS THE LOADING ZONE? THE USE REQUIRES ONE 10 |
| FT. X 25 FT. LOADING ZONE. [ZLDR S.94-485(P)] |
| |
| 5.) PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON MANUEVERING OF |
| LOADING VEHICLES TO AND FROM THE LOADING ZONE. IS THERE |
| SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE FOR LOADING VEHICLES? |
| |
| 6.) WHERE DID THE REQUIRED PARKING CALCULATIONS COME |
| FROM (I.E. 3 PARKING SPACES PER 1,000 SQ. FT.)? THIS |
| SEEMS TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS |
| OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| |
| 7.) PLEASE CLARIFY THE NUMBER OF VACUUM SPACES. THE |
| PLAN STATES THERE ARE 12 VACUUM SPACES; STAFF HAS |
| COUNTED 13 SPACES. |
| |
| 8.) PROVIDE A STALL STRIPING DETAIL THAT IS CONSISTENT |
| WITH THE CONFIGURATION AND DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE |
| SITE PLAN. STALL PAINTING DIMENSIONS SHALL ALSO BE |
| CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S STALL STRIPING STANDARDS. |
| [ZLDR S.94-485(J)] |
| |
| 9.) THE SITE DATA TABULAR STATES THERE ARE 5 BICYCLE |
| PARKING SPACES PROVIDED; HOWEVER, STAFF CAN ONLY DETECT |
| ONE RACK (= 2 BICYCLE PARKING) IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE |
| ADDRESS. |
| |
| 10.) PLEASE RELOCATE THE BICYCLE RACK LOCATED ON THE |
| SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED CAR WASH BUILDING. THE RACK |
| IS LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY, |
| WHICH IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. |
| |
| 11.) DETAIL OF THE BICYCLE RACK IS MISSING FROM THE |
| PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE BICYCLE RACK MUST BE |
| CONSISTENT WITH THE BICYCLE PARKING DESIGN AND |
| STANDARDS OF THE CITY. |
| |
| |
| PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: |
| |
| 1.) ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A |
| COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SHALL NOT |
| EXCEED ONE-FOOT CANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARY OF |
| SUCH DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ILLUMINATION |
| SPILLOVER AT THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CPD TO DEMONSTRATE |
| COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-207(D)(8)] |
| |
| 2.) PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOT IN THE PLAN: ALL |
| OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND |
| SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM |
| ALL ADJACENT PUBLIC THROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309(A)] |
| |
| |
| SIGNAGE COMMENTS: |
| |
| 1.) IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE PROJECT WALL SIGNAGE WILL |
| COMPLY WITH THE SIGN REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIII OF |
| THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). IF |
| SO, A NOTE IN THE PLANS MUST CLEARLY STATE SO. PLEASE |
| NOTE THAT THE SIGNAGE IN THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS |
| IS DIFFERENT FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS, AND |
| STAFF HAS CONCERNS THAT THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA |
| IN THE ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS HAVE BEEN EXCEEDED. |
| |
| |
| INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| |
| * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| |
| * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| |
| * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE |
| (5) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X |
| 17 INCHES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND |
| DOCUMENTS. |
| |
| * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED |
| COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| ($600.00). |
| |
| * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| QUESTIONS. |
| |
|
Print |