Date |
Text |
2016-01-07 17:00:12 | PLANNING AND ZONING - SIGNAGE COMMENTS: |
| |
| 1/6/15 |
| |
| 1. SHEET SP-1.0: |
| |
| A. 'AREA EXISTING PYLON SIGN:' FOR DETAIL 2 NEEDS TO BE |
| UPDATED AND SHOULD EQUAL 373.3 SF. |
| |
| B. IT IS UNCLEAR HOW THE ALLOWABLE COPY AREA IN DETAIL |
| 2 IS DETERMINED. |
| |
| C. PLEASE ADD DIMENSIONS TO THE SIGN GRAPHIC IN DETAIL |
| 3. |
| |
| D. 'AREA NEW PYLON SIGN:' AND 'TOTAL SIGN' SQUARE |
| FOOTAGE SHOULD BE THE SAME IN DETAIL 3, BUT ARE |
| DIFFERENT. PLEASE REVIEW AND UPDATE. |
| |
| E. IT IS UNCLEAR HOW THE ALLOWABLE COPY AREA IN DETAIL |
| 3 IS DETERMINED. ALLOWABLE COPY AREA FOR REPLACEMENT OF |
| THE EXISTING FREESTANDING SIGN IS 20 FEET (HEIGHT) BY 8 |
| FEET (WIDTH) PER RES. 3-14. |
| |
| 2. SHEET A - 4.0: |
| |
| A. DIMENSION BUIDLING WIDTH FOR DETERMINATION OF THE |
| FACADE AREA CALCULATION. |
| |
| B. THE FRONT FACADE (EAST) GETS 100% OF THE PERMITTED |
| COPY AREA. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| |
| C. THE SOUTH FACADE IN THE 'CALCULATION OF COPY AREA' |
| IS INCORRECTLY DESCRIBED AS THE EAST FACADE. PLEASE |
| CORRECT. |
| |
| D. REFERENCED SIGN SECTIONS FOR THE FRONT FACADE SHOULD |
| BE SEC. 94-(D)(1)(B) AND THE REFERENCED SIGN SECTIONS |
| FOR THE NON-FRONT FACADE SHOULD BE SEC. 94(D)(1)(C). |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: |
| |
| DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP |
| SENIOR PLANNER |
| PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION |
| PHONE: (561)-822-1443 |
| EMAIL: [email protected] |
| |
2015-12-18 16:43:08 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS ***FAILED*** |
| |
| 12/18/15 |
| |
| 1. THERE ARE SEVERAL UN-SHADED BOXES ON THE SITE PLAN |
| DEPICTING LOCATIONS WHERE THERE ARE UNENCLOSED COVERED |
| AREAS. PLEASE UPDATE THE SITE PLAN AND ADD |
| CROSSHATCHING. |
| |
| 2. 1,745 SQUARE FOOT AREA LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF |
| PROPOSED VOLVO BUILDING IS DEPICTED AS ENCLOSED SQUARE |
| FOOTAGE, BUT IS INSTEAD AN UNENCLOSED DRIVE THOUGH. |
| |
| 3. FOR DEPICTING REQUIRED PARKING FOR THE ENTIRE SITE |
| IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE/NUMBER OF |
| BAYS IS LISTED SEPARATELY FOR EACH BUILDING, THEN TOTAL |
| AMOUNTS OF SQUARE FOOTAGE/NUMBER OF BAYS IS TOTALED FOR |
| EACH USE TYPE TO SIMPLIFY HOW THE REQUIRED PARKING IS |
| DETERMINED. |
| |
| 4. PLEASE REVIEW AND REVISE THE AREA OF THE PREVIOUS |
| MARCUS JEWELERS BUILDING. PLAN INDICATES THIS AREA AS |
| REQUIRED PARKING, BUT IT IS DISPLAY AREA. ADDITIONALLY, |
| REVIEW THE CUSTOMER PARKING AREA NORTH OF THE DISPLAY |
| PARKING AS ONE OR TWO SPACES COUNTED ARE ACTUALLY TO BE |
| STRIPED FOR TURN AROUND. |
| |
| 5. PLEASE REVISE THE PARKING CALCULATION FOR THE |
| SERVICE BAYS - THE PARKING CALCULATION IS 1 SPACE PER 3 |
| BAYS RATHER THAN 3 SPACES PER 1 BAY. |
| |
| 6. INDICATE THE AREAS ON THE PLAN THAT ARE INCLUDED IN |
| THE CALCULATION FOR 'OUTDOOR STORAGE/DISPLAY'. |
| |
| 7. THE PARKING CALCULATION FOR THE EXISTING |
| HABITAT/TREE OF LIFE PLAZA IS 1 PER 300 SF PER THE |
| ORIGINAL PLAN. (NOTE: ANY NEW SQUARE FOOTAGE WILL HAVE |
| ITS PARKING DETERMINED BASED ON THE USE PROPOSED FOR |
| THE SPACE.) |
| |
| 8. INCLUDE A NOTE FOR BUILDINGS M AND L THAT |
| TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY IS STILL REQUIRED FOR THEIR |
| CONSTRUCTION (THIS IS PER NOTES ON PREVIOUSLY APPROVED |
| PLAN.) THERE MAY ALSO BE SOME ADDITIONAL SQUARE |
| FOOTAGE/SERVICE BAYS ADJACENT TO THE OLD HUMMER SITE |
| BASED ON 2005 PLAN, BUT ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION IS |
| REQUIRED. |
| |
| 9. THE CHART APPEARS TO HAVE TWO COLUMNS CALCULATING '1 |
| CAR PER 1,500 SF OUTDOOR DISPLAY PARKING'. WHAT IS THE |
| DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE COLUMNS? |
| |
| 10. FOR BUILDING K ARE THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF 2,287 AND |
| 2,959 BOTH PART OF THE STRIVE BAYS OR PARTS/SHOWROOM? |
| |
| 11. DOES THE OLD HUMMER BUILDING HAVE ANY SERVICE BAYS? |
| 2003/2005 PLAN INDICATED THERE WERE 23 FOR THAT |
| BUILDING. |
| |
| 12. IN THE LIST OF BUILDINGS INCLUDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| OF THE SERVICE AREAS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY OR |
| OTHERWISE CALL OUT ON THE SITE PLAN WHERE THE SERVICE |
| BAY AREAS ARE LOCATED. |
| |
| 13. INDICATE AREA TO BE ENCLOSED/EXPANDED AS PART OF |
| THE PROPOSAL. |
| |
| 14. PLEASE NOTE THAT PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE CALCULATIONS |
| FOR BICYCLE PARKING AND LOADING AREAS AS INVENTORY FOR |
| FUTURE SITE CHANGES. IF NOT INCLUDED ON THIS PLAN, IT |
| WILL NEED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE NEXT SUBMITTAL FOR SITE |
| PLAN MODIFICATION. |
| |
| 15. ANY COMMENTS ON SIGNAGE REVIEW WILL BE PROVIDED |
| DEC. 29TH AND I WILL ALSO SEND A SAMPLE COPY OF HOW TO |
| ADDRESS #3 WHEN I RETURN TO THE OFFICE ON DEC. 29. |
| |
| DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP |
| SENIOR PLANNER |
| |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| PLANNING DIVISION |
| PHONE: (561) 822-1443 |
| EMAIL: [email protected] |
|
Print |