Date |
Text |
2010-12-07 13:55:26 | ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| DATE OF REVIEW: 12/06/2010 |
| PROJECT NO.: Z10110009 |
| CASE NO.: ISPR 10-04 |
| ADDRESS: 2100 NORTH FLORIDA MANGO ROAD |
| APPLICANT/CONTACT: KEITH SPINA |
| TELEPHONE NO.: 561.684.6488 |
| SCOPE OF REVIEW: CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 13,245 SQUARE |
| FOOT OFFICE BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| |
| 1. THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT PROVIDED, DATED MAY 12, |
| 2010, DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE PROPOSED |
| DEVELOPMENT. THE STATEMENT INDICATES DIFFERENT |
| INGRESS/EGRESS POINTS, DIFFERENT SQUARE FOOTAGES, ETC. |
| |
| 2. THE DRAINAGE STATEMENT, DATED MAY 14, 2010, DOES NOT |
| ACCURATELY REFLECT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. |
| |
| 3. THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER, |
| DATED MAY 17, 2010, DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE |
| PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. |
| |
| 4. THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS NEED TO BE |
| UPDATED AND/OR PROVIDED: |
| |
| A. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES |
| DEPARTMENT |
| |
| B. FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| |
| 5. THE LOT AREA SHOWN ON THE SITE DATE TABLE (SHEET |
| SP-1) SHALL BE MODIFIED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THAT |
| WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. BE SURE TO ADJUST ALL |
| OTHER CALCULATIONS ACCORDINGLY. |
| |
| 6. THE GATES FOR THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHALL NOT BE |
| CHAIN-LINK WITH A FABRIC SCREENING; THEY SHALL BE A |
| PERMANENT, SOLID OPAQUE GATE. |
| |
| 7. CONSIDER REMOVING THE WHEEL STOPS AND ADDING |
| CURBING, PROVIDING FOR 16 FEET OF ASPHALT PARKING |
| SPACE, WITH 2 FEET OF VEHICLE OVERHANG IN THE FORM OF |
| SOD, GROUNDCOVER, ETC. THIS INCREASES THE AMOUNT OF |
| PERVIOUS SURFACE AND SIZE OF PLANTING AREA FOR TREES. |
| |
| 8. ???NO PARKING ??? LOADING ZONE??? SIGNS WILL NEED TO |
| BE INSTALLED UNDERNEATH THE COVERED DROP-OFF AREA. |
| |
| 9. THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1) LABELS THE LOCATIONS FOR |
| THE LIGHT POLES, BUT NO LIGHT POLES ARE SHOWN. |
| |
| 10. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-408(E)(2)(D) OF THE CITY???S |
| ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THERE SHALL BE |
| A MAXIMUM OF ONE (1) FREESTANDING SIGN ON THE PROPERTY. |
| ACCORDING TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, A FREESTANDING SIGN IS |
| SHOWN ALONG NORTH FLORIDA MANGO ROAD, WHILE AN |
| ADDITIONAL SIGN IS SHOWN ON THE BACKSIDE OF THE |
| DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. |
| |
| 11. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-408(E)(2)(E)(2) OF THE |
| CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, |
| FREESTANDING SIGNS SHALL BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF FIVE |
| (5) FEET FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| |
| 12. ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY, THERE IS A 10 FOOT |
| DRAINAGE EASEMENT THAT RUNS INSIDE OF THE NORTH AND |
| EAST PROPERTY LINES. THIS EASEMENT WILL NEED TO BE |
| ABANDONED, AS LANDSCAPING, FENCING, A/C PADS, ETC. ARE |
| BEING PROPOSED. |
| |
| 13. PLEASE NOTE THAT PER SECTION 94-481(C) OF THE |
| CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, A |
| CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED FOR THE NEW |
| BUILDING UNTIL THE OLD BUILDING HAS BEEN DEMOLISHED AND |
| REMAINING SITE IMPROVEMENTS (I.E. PARKING, LANDSCAPING, |
| ETC.) HAVE BEEN INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED |
| PLANS. WHILE THE EXISTING BUILDING MAY BE UTILIZED |
| DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW BUILDING, IT APPEARS |
| THAT THERE MAY BE A PERIOD OF TIME WHEN THE OLD |
| BUILDING WILL BE DEMOLISHED, AND NEW BUILDING WILL NOT |
| BE ABLE TO BE OCCUPIED. |
| |
| 14. PLEASE CLARIFY THAT AREA ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| LABELED AS ???GRAVEL PATH SERVICE AREA ACCESS???. WHAT |
| ARE THE BOUNDARIES OR LIMITS OF THIS PATH? THERE DOES |
| NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN SUCH AREA |
| AND OTHER AREAS TO BE SODDED. |
| |
| 15. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO |
| THE PROPOSED A/C UNITS. WHAT IS THE SIZE, HEIGHT, ETC.? |
| A LOW ???KNEE-WALL??? SHALL BE PROVIDED TO SCREEN SUCH |
| MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| |
| A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| |
| B) 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| |
| C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| |
| D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| |
| E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| |
| JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT |
| 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 |
| WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| |
| PHONE: 561.822.1435 |
| FAX: 561.822.1459 |
| |
| EMAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM |
| |
|
Print |