Date |
Text |
2010-12-13 11:43:54 | 2100 FLORIDA MANGO ROAD |
| NEW BUILDING AND EAST HALF OF PARKING LOT TO BE BUILT |
| AND THEN EXISTING WEST BUILDING AND REST OF WEST |
| PARKING LOT TO BE DEMOED AND NEW PARKING LOT TO BE |
| BUILT. |
| 1) DISCUSS WITH CSD, PHASING PROJECT WILL/WILL NOT |
| AFFECT CO. THIS IS ASSUMING THAT THE NEW BUILDING IS TO |
| BE PUT INTO SERVICE AND THEN THE OLD BUILDING WILL BE |
| CLOSED AND DEMOLISHED. |
| 2) EXISTING TREE PLAN REQUIRED. |
| 3) EXISTING DRIVEWAY ON WORTHINGTON APPEARS TO BE |
| REPLACED, BUT IT WILL NOT WORK. IT WILL NEED TO BE |
| REMOVED AND UPGRADED TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS PER FDOT |
| STANDARDS. |
| 4) THIS MEANS AT ONE TIME THERE WILL BE NO DRIVEWAY IN |
| THE PARKING LOT FOR THE OLD BUILDING, DO THE OWNERS |
| UNDERSTAND THIS? SINCE THE DRIVEWAY NEEDS TO COME OUT |
| TO MEET ADA, MAYBE BUILD THE NEW DRIVEWAY EAST OF THE |
| OLD AND ABANDON THE OLD WHEN THE BUILDING IS TO BE |
| DEMOLISHED AND THE WEST HALF IS TO BE BUILT? |
| 5) THE NEW STORM SEWER FOR THE NEW PARKING LOT GOES |
| THRU THE OLD BUILDING, WHICH WILL STILL BE THERE, |
| REDESIGN THE STORM SEWER. |
| 6) DOES SURVEY SHOW EASEMENT FOR POWER NOT SHOWN ON |
| WEST SIDE OF SOUTH PROPERTY? (NO SURVEY WITH THIS SET |
| OF PLANS) |
| 7) HAVE THEY DECIDED HOW THE BUILDING IS TO BE BUILT? I |
| DO NOT SEE THE CONTRACTOR USING THE REMAINING HALF OF |
| THE EXISTING PARKING LOT, SO THEY WILL NEED ROW FOR |
| STORAGE AND EQUIPMENT. AN ADDITIONAL COST TO THEM ($ |
| 0.50 PER FOOT, PER DAY AND SAME FOR SIDEWALK AND |
| PARKING SPACES). |
| 8) THE EXISTING BUILDINGS SERVICES WILL NEED TO BE USED |
| TILL THE OLD BUILDING IS DEMOLISHED. THIS SHOULD BE |
| LOOKED INTO, RELOCATING THE EXISTING METER AND/OR |
| RUNNING A PIPE FROM THE EXISTING TO THE NEW BUILDING |
| WILL BE A MONUMENTALLY LESS EXPENSIVE WAY TO REDO THE |
| SERVICE. |
| 9) THE PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW THE REMOVAL OF ANY SERVICES |
| BACK TO THE MAIN. |
| 10) DISCUSS, OLD ADA SPACES WILL BE WIPED OUT DURING |
| PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION, BUT THE NEW ADA SPACES WILL NOT |
| BE COMPLIANT TO THE OLD BUILDING. |
| 11) THE LIGHT GREY IS TO BE BUILT IN PHASE 1, AND THE |
| DARK GREY IS TO BE BUILT DURING PHASE 2, BUT THE PHASE |
| LINE DRAWN THRU THE SITE DOES NOT MATCH THE PLAN, WHICH |
| IS CORRECT? |
| 12) SITE PLAN AND CIVIL PLAN FOR PARKING LOT DO NOT |
| MATCH, WHICH IS CORRECT? |
| |
| BRIAN R. MOREE |
| ENGINEERING SERVICES CONSTRUCTION MANAGER |
| 401 CLEMATIS STREET |
| WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 |
| 561-644-7270 |
| |
2010-12-08 09:22:43 | 1. HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES NEED TO BE REDESIGNED FOR |
| PHASE WORK CONFLICT WITH EXISTING DRIVE CONFIGURATION. |
| 2. SHOW STOP BAR AND LANE STRIPE ON SITE PLAN FOR |
| ENTRANCE / EXIT TO WASHINGTON ROAD. |
| 3. ALL TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CONTROLS IN PARKING AREA |
| SHALLBE STRIPED WITH THERMOPLASTIC. |
| 4. RECOMMENDATION TO CONSIDER USE OF ALTERNATIVE OR LED |
| LIGHTING FOR THE PARKING AREA. |
| 5. SITE CIVIL DRAWINGS WILL REQUIRE UTILITY |
| CALCULATIONS, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN , AND |
| POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. |
| |
| BRIAN R. MOREE |
| ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR |
| 401 CLEMATIS STREET |
| WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 |
| 561-494-1098 OFFICE |
| 561-644-7270 MOBILE |
|
Print |