| Date |
Text |
| 2023-06-09 15:49:24 | E22080036 506 DATURA ST 4.25.23 RESUB REVIEW |
| | |
| | NO COMMENTS FROM LINDA QUI??ONES-CINTRON, PROJECT |
| | COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1085 |
| | [email protected] : |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE |
| | SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262 OR |
| | [email protected]: |
| | -RESPONSE DOES NOT RESOLVE COMMENT 5 FROM PRIOR |
| | RESPONSE LETTER. [COMMENT 5: CHECK THE FIRELINE PROFILE |
| | ON SHEET C07. SOME SIZES STILL LOOK INCONSISTENT VS |
| | PLAN VIEW) RESPONSE LABELS AND DEPICTIONS OF THE |
| | PROPOSED & EXISTING WATER MAINS WERE ADDED TO THE CROSS |
| | SECTION VIEWS ON SHEET C-07.] THE FIRELINE PROFILE |
| | SHOWS 10 IN PIPE AND GATE VALVE FROM WATER MAIN, BUT |
| | PLAN AND BLOWUP PLAN SHOW 8 INCH FITTINGS, 8 INCH TEE, |
| | 6 INCH TEE, AND 6 INCH PIPE. PLEASE REVIEW AND UPDATE |
| | SO CONTRACTORS WILL BE ABLE TO CONSTRUCT WATER LINE AND |
| | UTILITY DEPARTMENT CAN BILL PROPERLY. ON THE BLOWUP |
| | DETAIL ALSO ADD SIZE TO THE LABELS OF THE GATE VALVES |
| | FOR THE FIRELINE AND FIRE HYDRANT. FOR A 10 INCH DCDA |
| | WOULD EXPECT 10 INCH GATE VALVE IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM OF |
| | IT. |
| | COMMENTS FROM TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENG., |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES, [email protected] 561-494-1120: |
| | 1. SHEET C-04 |
| | A. REVISE THE PIPE MATERIAL FROM CMP TO RCP FOR THE |
| | STORM PIPE EAST OF STRUCTURE EX S-1. |
| | B. REVISE THE PIPE MATERIAL FROM VCP TO DIP FOR THE |
| | EXISTING TWO STORMPIPES BETWEEN EXISTING STRUCTURES |
| | CB-5 AND CB-6. |
| | 2. SHEET C-05 |
| | A. VERIFY THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON SECTION B-B. REVISE |
| | THE DIMENSION OF THE DRIVEWAY APRON TO THE BACK OF THE |
| | VALLEY GUTTER. |
| | 3. SHEET C-06 |
| | A. COORDINATE PLACEMENT OF THE WEIR AND PRB IN THE PLAN |
| | VIEW AND SECTION VIEW OF THE CS-1 CONTROL STRUCTURE |
| | DETAIL. |
| | B. COORDINATE THE DIAMETER OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE AS |
| | SHOWN IN THE CS-1 CONTROL STRUCTURE PLAN VIEW AND THE |
| | CALL OUT ON THE DRAINAGE PLAN. |
| | C. REVISE THE PIPE MATERIAL FROM VCP TO DIP FOR THE |
| | EXISTING TWO STORMPIPES BETWEEN EXISTING STRUCTURES |
| | CB-5 AND CB-6. |
| | 4. SHEET C-07 |
| | A. CONFLICT #6 WILL BE WITH THE EXISTING 24-INCH VCP OR |
| | THE PROPOSED 24-INCH RCP. |
| | 5. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS |
| | A. INCORRECT RAINFALL DEPTHS USED IN THE EXISTING |
| | CONDITIONS CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM RICKY ELIZONDO, PUB. UTILITIES PLANS |
| | EXAMINER, [email protected] , 561-494-1101: |
| | -COMMENT 8 NOT FULLY ADDRESSED. PER GIS, THERE ARE TWO |
| | EXISTING LATERALS LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE MANHOLE, |
| | ONE OF WHICH APPEARS TO SERVE 524 DATURA. THERE ALSO |
| | APPEAR TO BE TWO EXISTING WATER SERVICES TO THE WEST OF |
| | THE EXISTING 6??? DIP FIRE LINE (BOTH OF WHICH SERVE |
| | 524 DATURA) |
| | -COMMENT 15 NOT FULLY ADDRESSED, ADD THE LANGUAGE GIVEN |
| | IN THE COMMENT RESPONSE TO THE PLANS |
| | -POINTS OF SERVICE ARE NOT DENOTED FOR ALL |
| | SERVICE/LATERAL CONNECTIONS. PLEASE REFLECT ON PLANS. |
| | -PER STANDARDS, 8??? LATERALS REQUIRE MANHOLE |
| | CONNECTIONS. |
| | -SEWER CONNECTIONS WOULD BE PREFERRED ON QUADRILLE |
| | PLAZA DR. IN ORDER TO ALLOW FUTURE ABANDONMENT OF |
| | UTILITIES IN THE ALLEY. |
| | -12??? WATER MAIN SHOWN AS CAST IRON ON DEMO, BUT |
| | REFLECTED AS DIP ON UTILITY SHEET |
| | |
| | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | CONCERNS, THANKS. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
