Date |
Text |
2002-07-18 00:00:00 | 1) PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPREHENSIVE |
| NARRATIVE FOR THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM |
| PLANNED FOR USE. THE ORIGINAL DESIGN |
| INDICATED PRESSURIZING TWO FLOORS ABOVE |
| AND TWO FLOORS BELOW WITH THE FLOOR |
| OF INCIDENT BETWEEN THESE. DURING |
| TESTING WITH CITY MECHANICAL DIVISION |
| PERSONNEL, PROBLEMS WERE IDENTIFIED |
| AND THUS THE ORGINAL DESIGN HAS SINCE |
| BEEN CHANGES. THE NARRATIVE IS |
| REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD |
| TO PROVIDE SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTATION |
| FOR THE DESIGN CHANGE. |
| |
| 2) IS IS UNDERSTOOD BY THIS OFFICE THAT |
| A TEMPROARY SHROUD HAS BEEN INSTALLED |
| ON THE FAN. THIS TEMPORARY DEVICE IS |
| TO BE REMOVED AS IT NOT PART OF THE |
| ORIGINAL LISTING FOR THE FAN DEVICE. |
| |
| 3) THE ACCEPTANCE TESTING CRITERIA |
| NOTED ON THE PLANS ARE TO BE FOLLOWED. |
| |
| 4) THE OWNER, ENGINEER, AND CONTRACTOR |
| MUST ACCEPT THE LIABILTIY FOR |
| THE PRESCRIBED SYSTEM DURING TESTING |
| SINCE THE DESIGN INTENT HAS CHANGED |
| SIGNIFICANTLY. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD |
| SHALL BE CONSULTED DURING THE ENTIRE |
| TESTING PROCESS. |
| |
| 5) THE FUNCTIONAL APPROVAL BY CITY |
| OFFICIALS WILL ONLY OCCUR AFTER |
| MUTUALLY AGREED UPON TESTING METHODS |
| AND RESULTS ARE DISCUSSSED. |
| |
| 6) ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING, FIRE , AND |
| MECHANICAL CODES ARE TO BE MET FOR |
| THE SYSTEM WITHIN THE BUILDING. |