Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 23050320
Permit Number 23050320
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2023-07-20 12:03:37INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) HANDHOLE 08+12 MAY NOT BE LOCATED IN THE LOCATION AS
 SHOWN. THE BULB OUT WAS ESTABLISHED AS FULLY PLANTED
 WITH SHRUBS, REGARDLESS OF THE CURRENT MAINTENANCE OF
 THOSE SHRUBS. A HANDHOLE MAY NOT BE LOCATED HERE AS IT
 WOULD RESULT IN THE REMOVAL OF AREA THAT IS DESIGNATED
 FOR LANDSCAPE GROWTH.
  
 2) HANDHOLE 14+60 IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE
 ELECTRIC LINE FOR THE STREETLIGHTS. THE PROFILE VIEW
 DOES NOT SHOW THE STREETLIGHT ELECTRIC LINE. PROVIDE
 THE UTILITY SIGN OFF FROM THE TELEPHONE PROVIDER (MOST
 LIKELY CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH BUT COULD BE FPL).
  
 3) BORE PIT 17+60 IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A
 TELEPHONE LINE. PROVIDE THE UTILITY SIGN OFF FROM THE
 TELEPHONE PROVIDER (MOST LIKELY AT&T).
  
 4) THE PLANS SHOW AN OPEN CUT TRENCH STARTING AT STA
 19+75. THE DETAILS SHOW THAT A PORTION OF THE TRENCH IS
 PROPOSED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.
 THE FACT THAT THERE IS A SIDEWALK EASEMENT DOES NOT
 PERMIT WORK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
  
 5) BORE PIT 20+61 IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A
 TELEPHONE LINE AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF EXISTING TELECOM
 INFRASTRUCTURE. PROVIDE THE UTILITY SIGN OFF FROM THE
 TELEPHONE PROVIDER(S) (MOST LIKELY AT&T).
  
 6) THE PROFILE VIEW ON SHEET 28A DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS
 SHOWN ON PLAN SHEET 28 (EX. BORE PIT 20+61 IS NOT
 SHOWN).
  
 7) REPEAT COMMENT: SURVEY SHEET 18 SHOWS THAT A PORTION
 OF THE BORE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERN STREET ON
 ENGINEERING SHEET 29 IS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WHICH IS
 NOT PERMITTED UNLESS IT IS WITHIN A GENERAL UTILITY
 EASEMENT. NOT UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN ON YOUR
 SURVEY.
  
 8) UPDATED REPEAT COMMENT: THE TREE PITS ON THE NORTH
 SIDE OF FERN STREET ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF A 20-FOOT BY
 20-FOOT AREA OF STRUCTURAL SOIL WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED
 TO BE DISTURBED BY HANDHOLES, BORE PITS, BORES OR
 EXCAVATIONS. HANDHOLE 22+13 AND ITS EXCAVATION AND
 BORES ARE IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE STRUCTURAL SOIL
 SURROUNDING A TREE PIT AND IS NOT PERMITTED IN THIS
 LOCATION.
  
 9) UPDATED REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE
 UTILITIES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERN STREET IN FRONT OF
 THE 360 ROSEMARY BUILDING. THERE CONTINUES TO BE A
 DISCREPANCY BETWEEN YOUR PLANS AND THE 360 ROSEMARY
 PLANS AS TO THE LOCATION OF THE GAS LINE UNDER THE
 SIDEWALK. YOU MUST SHOW THIS ACCURATELY AND PROVIDE A
 LETTER OF NO OBJECTION BASED ON THE PROXIMITY OF YOUR
 PROPOSED EXCAVATIONS WITHIN FIVE FEET OF THEIR LINES.
 THE GAS LINE NEEDS TO BE ACCURATELY REPRESENTED ON THE
 PROFILE PLAN.
  
 10) UPDATED COMMENT: WHILE HANDHOLE 25+32 ON SHEET 29
 IS SHOW WITHIN THE FUTURE SIDEWALK OF THE 515 FERN
 STREET PROJECT, THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE EXCAVATION
 IS WITHIN THE PROPOSED STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE AREA. IF
 THE HANDHOLD IS INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE STREETSCAPE
 IMPROVEMENTS, THEN THERE IS NO ISSUE WITH THE
 EXCAVATION. IF THE HANDHOLE IS INSTALLED AFTER THE 10)
  
 11) UPDATED REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE
 UTILITIES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERN STREET IN FRONT OF
 THE 515 FERN STREET BUILDING. HANDHOLE 25+32 DIRECTLY
 CONFLICTS WITH A GAS LINE. YOU MUST PROVIDE A LETTER OF
 NO OBJECTION BASED ON THE PROXIMITY OF YOU PROPOSED
 EXCAVATIONS WITHIN FIVE FEET OF THEIR LINES. THE GAS
 LINE NEEDS TO BE ACCURATELY REPRESENTED ON THE PROFILE
 PLAN.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446
 [email protected]
  
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved