Date |
Text |
2023-05-25 18:33:42 | INSUFFICIENT |
| |
| THE SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLANS HAVE MULTIPLE |
| INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE TWO AND WITH ACTUAL |
| CONDITIONS. STAFF HAS LISTED THESE BELOW. ALL PLANS |
| MUST SHOW ACCURATE, CONSISTENT INFORMATION. |
| |
| 1) PROVIDE SHEET 23 AND 24 OF 29 WHICH INCLUDE THE |
| START OF THE PROJECT WITHIN THE SAPODILLA AVENUE |
| RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH OF OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD. |
| |
| 2) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF |
| IRIS STREET AND SAPODILLA AVENUE IS NOT SHOWN IN THE |
| SAME LOCATION ON SURVEY SHEET 15 AND ENGINEERING SHEET |
| 25. THE BORE AND BORE PIT 04+92 ARE LOCATED ON PRIVATE |
| PROPERTY BASED ON THE SURVEY. |
| |
| 3) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR THE WEST SIDE OF SAPODILLA |
| AVENUE IS NOT SHOWN IN THE SAME LOCATION ON THE SURVEY |
| SHEETS AS IT IS ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. BASED ON THE |
| SURVEY, THE ENTIRE BORE, HANDHOLE 08+12 AND HANDHOLE |
| 14+60 ARE IN PRIVATE PROPERTY. |
| |
| 4) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF |
| GARDENIA STREET AND SAPODILLA AVENUE IS NOT SHOWN IN |
| THE SAME LOCATION ON SURVEY SHEET 16 AND ENGINEERING |
| SHEET 27. THE BORE AND BORE PIT 12+12 ARE LOCATED ON |
| PRIVATE PROPERTY BASED ON THE SURVEY. |
| |
| 5) THE FERN STREET, WEST OF ROSEMARY AVENUE, |
| RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN DOES |
| NOT MATCH THE WIDTH SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. NOTE: BASED ON |
| OTHER SURVEYS FOR THE AREA THAT STAFF HAS SEEN THE |
| SURVEY SHOWS THE WIDTH CORRECTLY AT 70 FEET. STAFF IS |
| UNABLE TO VERIFY IF THE BORE AND BORE PIT 18+62 ARE |
| WHOLLY IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| |
| 6) SURVEY SHEET 18 SHOWS PORTIONS OF THE BORE ON THE |
| NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF FERN STREET ON PRIVATE |
| PROPERTY WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED UNLESS IT IS WITHIN A |
| GENERAL UTILITY EASEMENT. NOT UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE |
| SHOWN ON YOUR SURVEY. |
| |
| 7) SHEET 28 FAILS TO SHOW THE LANDSCAPE PLANTING AREAS |
| ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERN STREET. THE LANDSCAPE AREAS |
| ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERN STREET. HANDHOLE 22+13 AND |
| ITS EXCAVATION IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A TREE PIT. |
| ADDITIONALLY, ALL OF THE TREE PITS ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF |
| A 20 FOOT BY 20 FOOT AREA OF STRUCTURAL SOIL WHICH IS |
| NOT PERMITTED TO BE DISTURBED BY BORES OR EXCAVATIONS. |
| |
| 8) BASED ON THE PLANS APPROVED WITH THE 360 ROSEMARY |
| PROJECT (NORTHEAST CORNER OF ROSEMARY AVENUE AND FERN |
| STREET) THE SUBMITTED SHEET 28 FAILS TO SHOW ALL OF THE |
| UTILITIES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERN STREET. THIS AREA |
| INCLUDES FPL, FPU, AT&T AND SPRINT LINES. THE PROPOSED |
| BORE, OPEN CUT AND HANDHOLE 22+13 DIRECTLY CONFLICT |
| WITH THESE UTILITIES. YOU MUST PROVIDE A LETTER OF NO |
| OBJECTION FROM THESE UTILITY PROVIDERS BASED ON YOUR |
| PROPOSED PLAN. |
| |
| 9) SHEET 29 SHOWS THE LANDSCAPE PLANTING AREAS ON THE |
| NORTH SIDE OF FERN STREET; HOWEVER, IT NEEDS TO SHOW |
| THE DIMENSION FROM THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE EXCAVATION |
| FOR HANDHOLE 25+32 TO THE EASTERN EDGE OF THE TREE PIT. |
| THE STRUCTURAL SOIL, WHICH EXTENDS 10 FEET FROM THE |
| CENTER OF THE TREE PIT MAY NOT BE DISTURBED. |
| ADDITIONALLY, THE CITY HAS APPROVED PLANS FOR A NEW |
| PROJECT TO BE LOCATED AT 515 FERN. HANDHOLE 25+32 |
| APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH THE NEW STREETSCAPE. PLEASE |
| CONTACT STAFF FOR A COPY OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SO THAT |
| THE HANDHOLE CAN BE SHIFTED TO AVOID BOTH AVOID THE |
| CURRENT TREE PIT AND THE FUTURE LANDSCAPE AREA. |
| |
| 10) BASED ON THE PLANS APPROVED WITH THE 515 FERN |
| STREET PROJECT (NORTH SIDE OF FERN STREET, EAST HALF OF |
| BLOCK) THE SUBMITTED SHEET 29 FAILS TO SHOW ALL OF THE |
| UTILITIES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERN STREET. THIS AREA |
| INCLUDES FPL, FPU, AT&T AND SPRINT LINES. THE PROPOSED |
| BORE AND HANDHOLE 22+13 DIRECTLY CONFLICT WITH THESE |
| UTILITIES. YOU MUST PROVIDE A LETTER OF NO OBJECTION |
| FROM THESE UTILITY PROVIDERS BASED ON YOUR PROPOSED |
| PLAN. |
| |
| CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |