Plan Review Notes For Permit 23030381 |
Permit Number |
23030381 |
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
Sequence Number |
1 |
|
Notes |
Date |
Text |
2023-03-08 14:41:15 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) SHEET LS 102 - THERE IS NO INDICATION OF AN AREA OF | | REFUGE. | | | | PER NFPA 101 CH 38, NEW BUSINESS | | | | 38.2.2.12 AREAS OF REFUGE. | | 38.2.2.12.1 AREAS OF REFUGE COMPLYING WITH 7.2.12 SHALL | | BE | | PERMITTED | | | | AREAS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH SEVERE MOBILITY | | IMPAIRMENT IN NEW | | BUILDINGS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF | | EGRESS IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH 7.5.4.1. | | | | THE PROVISION OF 38.2.2.12.2 PERMITS A SPRINKLERED | | STORY | | OF A BUSINESS OCCUPANCY BUILDING TO BE CONSIDERED AN | | AREA OF | | REFUGE, EVEN IF AN OCCUPANT DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO ANY | | OF THE | | TENANT SPACES. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SPRINKLER SYSTEMS | | SHOULD | | ALLOW AN OCCUPANT WITH MOBILITY IMPAIRMENT TO REMAIN ON | | THE | | FLOOR OF FIRE ORIGIN WITHOUT EXPERIENCING UNTENABLE | | CONDITIONS. | | DOORS TO TENANT SPACES THAT ARE LOCKED CREATE | | INACCESSIBILITY TO | | SPACES OTHER THAN THE CORRIDOR, SO THE CORRIDOR | | EFFECTIVELY SERVES | | AS THE AREA OF REFUGE, EVEN THOUGH IT DOES NOT | | NECESSARILY MEET | | THE DETAILED REQUIREMENTS OF 7.2.12 | | | | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE PER THE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET | | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE | | ABOVE. | | | | | | 3) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE | | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | FIRE MARSHAL | | 561-804-4709 | | [email protected] | | |
|