Date |
Text |
2023-06-07 10:20:08 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| PERMIT #23021273 |
| 292 SUMMA ST |
| |
| 1- PROPOSED SITE PLAN ON SHEET A-001: PROPOSED 6'-0" |
| C.M.U. SITE WALL ON THE WEST SIDE WITH A WOOD GATE. |
| SITE PLAN ALSO SHOWS A PROPOSED SWIMMING POOL. IT LOOKS |
| LIKE THE PROPOSED SITE WALL IS GOING TO BE PART OF THE |
| RESIDENTIAL SWIMMING BARRIER REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. |
| R4501.17 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. IF THIS IS THE CASE, THEN |
| PROVIDE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS ACCESS GATE |
| SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R4501.17.1.8 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. IF THE SITE WALL IS NOT GOING TO BE |
| PART OF THE SWIMMING BARRIER REQUIREMENTS, THEN CLEARLY |
| STATE ON PLANS. |
| NOTE: THIS PERMIT IS FOR THE SITE WALL CONSTRUCTION |
| ONLY. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| A)PROPOSED GATES SHALL HAVE NO MORE THAN 2 INCHES |
| VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN GRADE AND BOTTOM OF GATE. |
| SEC. R4501.17.1.8 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND SEC. R4501.17.1.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| B)PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS SPECIFICATIONS FOR POST |
| SUPPORTING THE WOOD GATE ON THE PROPOSED CHAIN LINK |
| FENCE. SPECIFY PROPOSED FOOTING. |
| SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| |
| NOTE: THIS PERMIT IS FOR THE SITE WALL CONSTRUCTION |
| ONLY. NEED SEPARATE FENCE POOL PERMIT. |
| |
| 2- DIGITAL SIGNATURE REVIEW: |
| A)UNABLE TO VERIFY ARCHITECT'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE. |
| PLEASE RESUBMIT WITH ARCHITECT'S VERIFIABLE DIGITAL |
| SIGNATURE. |
| |
| ARCHITECTS |
| 61G1-16.005 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND |
| SEALING AND FOR ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTING PLANS, |
| SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS. |
| |
| B)ENGINEER'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF FBPE. NEED A SEPARATE TEXT BOX WITH THE |
| TEXT BOX LANGUAGE IDENTICAL TO THE SAMPLES SHOWN BY |
| FBPE. |
| SEE FBPE.ORG/LEGAL/SIGNING-AND-SEALING-ENGINEERING-DOCU |
| MENTS/ AND REVISE DIGITAL SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| ENGINEERS |
| SEC. 61G15-23.004 F.A.C. . PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY |
| SIGNING AND SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS, |
| SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS. |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND |
| HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE |
| REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| COOPERATION. |
| |
| PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |
| 06/07/23 TALKED TO JENNY ALVAREZ (CURY ENTERPRISES). |
| THEY ARE DOING THE SITE WALL ONLY. POOL CONTRACTOR OR |
| OWNER IS DOING THE CHAIN LINK FENCE UNDER A SEPARATE |
| PERMIT FOR THE OTHER PART OF THE CHILD BARRIER FENCE. |
| JG. |