Date |
Text |
2022-11-07 13:10:23 | 1ST BUILDING REVIEW |
| RESULTS: CORRECTIONS NEEDED |
| |
| CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, CBO, BN, PX, CFM |
| PLANS EXAMINER II |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| (561) 805-6726 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| CODES IN EFFECT: |
| 2020 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION W/2017 WEST |
| PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, |
| CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION |
| NFPA 70 2017 EDITION NEC 2017 |
| |
| ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT: |
| |
| NOTICE: VALUE WAS ADJUSTED TO $468,974 PER THE ICC |
| BUILDING VA;LUATION DATA. |
| |
| 1.PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MOST RECENT BOUNDARY LINE |
| SURVEY. |
| 107.2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS |
| SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS107.2.1 THROUGH |
| 107.2.5. |
| |
| 2. PROVIDE A SITE DRAINAGE PLAN PER FBC R401.3 |
| IT SHALL BE DRAWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN ACCURATE AND |
| INCLUDED BOUNDARY LINE SURVEY. |
| |
| 3. PROVIDE AN ENERGY SUBMITTAL RESIDENTIAL (RE) |
| R401.2COMPLIANCE. |
| SECTION R405 AND THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS R401 |
| THROUGH R404 LABELED MANDATORY. |
| |
| 4. IDENTIFY CEILING AND WALL INSULATION TYPE AND |
| R-VALUE ON PLANS. |
| 107.2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE |
| WITH SECTIONS107.2.1 THROUGH 107.2.5. |
| |
| 5. PROVIDE A WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULE. CREATE A LEGEND |
| AND IDENTIFY WINDOWS ON FLOOR PLAN. |
| 107.2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE |
| WITH SECTIONS107.2.1 THROUGH 107.2.5. |
| |
| 6.PROVIDE THE FL PRODUCT APPROVALS OR MIAMI-DADE NOA |
| FOR THE PROPOSED WINDOWS AND EXT. DOORS. |
| FL PRODUCT APPROVALS SHALL INCLUDE THE COVER SHEETS, |
| EVALUATION REPORT AND INSTALLATIONS INSTRUCTIONS. |
| NOTE: NOAS DO NOT HAVE COVER SHEETS. |
| FBC 107.3.4 PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THOSE |
| PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY FAC RULE 9N-3 REVIEWED |
| AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| |
| 7. PROVIDE A ROOF DRAINAGE [PLAN. |
| R903.4ROOF DRAINAGE. |
| UNLESS ROOFS ARE SLOPED TO DRAIN OVER ROOF EDGES, ROOF |
| DRAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EACH LOW POINT OF THE |
| ROOF. WHERE REQUIRED FOR ROOF DRAINAGE, SCUPPERS SHALL |
| BE PLACED LEVEL WITH THE ROOF SURFACE IN A WALL OR |
| PARAPET. THE SCUPPER SHALL BE LOCATED AS DETERMINED BY |
| THE ROOF SLOPE AND CONTRIBUTING ROOF AREA. |
| R903.4.1OVERFLOW DRAINS AND SCUPPERS. |
| |
| 8. STOOP LOCATED AT REAR FRENCH DOORS MUST BE THREE |
| FEET IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. |
| R311.3 FLOORS AND LANDINGS AT EXTERIOR DOORS. |
| THERE SHALL BE A LANDING OR FLOOR ON EACH SIDE OF EACH |
| EXTERIOR DOOR. |
| THE WIDTH OF EACH LANDING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE |
| DOOR SERVED. EVERY LANDING SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM |
| DIMENSION OF 36 INCHES (914 MM) MEASURED IN THE |
| DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. EXTERIOR LANDINGS SHALL BE |
| PERMITTED TO HAVE A SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 1/4 UNIT |
| VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL (2-PERCENT). |
| |
| 9. ELEVATION DRAWINGS: |
| REMOVE ALL OTHER ADDRESS FROM THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS. |
| INCLUDE THE EAST, WEST AND SOUTH ELEVATION. |
| 107.2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE |
| WITH SECTIONS107.2.1 THROUGH 107.2.5. |
| |
| 10. PLAN PAGE S2 SHOWS ROOF PRESSURES FOR A HIP ROOF. |
| THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE A FLAT ROOF. PROVIDE DESIGN |
| PRESSURES FOR A FLAT ROOVE. INCLUDE A FASTENER SCHEDULE |
| BASED ON THESE NEW PRESSURES. |
| 107.2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE |
| WITH SECTIONS107.2.1 THROUGH 107.2.5. |
| |
| 11. PROVIDE A ROOF TRUSS TO EXT. WALL CONNECTOR |
| SCHEDULE.PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL |
| AND/OR REVISED MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW |
| COMMENTS. |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| ***** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW **** |
| |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL |
| IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH SOME NEW COMMENTS, |
| SOME BASED ON PLANS NOW SUBMITTED, NEW DOCUMENTS BEING |
| REVIEWED FOR THE FIRST TIME AND SOME NEW COMMENTS NOT |
| MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS. |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM |
| PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A NO, OK OR A NO/OK. |
| THESE WILL BE FOR THE EXACT NUMERICAL NOTATION OF THE |
| PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES. |
| |
| A NO IS IF THE COMMENT WAS NOT FULLY ADDRESSED AND/OR |
| FURTHER EXPLANATION OR CHANGES IN PLANS OR DOCUMENTS |
| ARE STILL NEEDED. THIS REVIEWER WILL TRY TO BETTER |
| EXPLAIN NOTE ABOVE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT. |
| |
| AN OK WILL BE LABELED AS SUCH ON THE SAME NUMERICAL |
| COMMENT AND WILL HAVE OLD NOTE REMOVED FROM COMMENTS. |
| |
| A NO/OK MEANS PART OF THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN |
| ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED. |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE ANY NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END OF |
| THE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AND NOTED AS SUCH. |
| MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |