| Date |
Text |
| 2023-01-30 16:46:30 | INSUFFICIENT |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. |
| | |
| | 1) THE SHEETS LABELED AS THE SURVEY AND SHEETS 023 OF |
| | 029 THROUGH 029A OF 029 SHOW A DIFFERENT CONDUIT |
| | LOCATION THAN IS SHOWN ON THE COVER SHEET 001 OF 014 |
| | AND THE OVERALL VIEW 02A OF 014. THIS LOOKS LIKE THERE |
| | ARE TWO DIFFERENT PROJECTS ALONG SAPODILLA AVENUE, ONE |
| | SOUTH OF FERN STREET AND ONE NORTH OF FERN STREET. ALL |
| | PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS AND SCOPE OF WORK. |
| | |
| | 2) THE UPLOAD TITLES DO NOT MATCH THE SHEET NAMES. EX. |
| | TITLE 012 PLAN & PROFILE IS FOR SHEET 023 OF 029 AND |
| | TITLE 012A PLAN & PROFILE IS SHEET 23C OF 029. ALL |
| | PLANS MUST BE CORRECTLY LABELED. THIS FAULTY LABELING |
| | LED TO INCONSISTENT PLANS BEING INCLUDED IN THE |
| | RESUBMITTAL AND/OR INCORRECT PLANS NOT BEING REMOVED. |
| | STAFF IS UNABLE TO TELL EXACTLY WHAT THE SCOPE OF WORK |
| | ON THIS PERMIT IS. |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE A SURVEY, PREPARED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED |
| | SURVEYOR, THAT SHOWS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, THE |
| | SIDEWALK, AND ANY TREES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG |
| | THE ENTIRE FIBER CONDUIT PATH SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY |
| | THAT THE BORE AND HANDHOLES ARE WITHIN THE |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE SHEETS THAT ARE PROVIDED AND LABELED |
| | AS THE SURVEY, DO NOT INCLUDE THE NAME OR SEAL OF THE |
| | SURVEYOR, NOR DO THEY INCLUDE THE DATE OF THE SURVEY |
| | AND APPEAR TO BE COPIES OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER |
| | AERIALS AND NOT THE SURVEYED RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE |
| | LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | 4) PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FROM THE EDGE OF THE |
| | EXCAVATION FOR BORE PIT 03+50 TO THE TRUNK OF THE |
| | NEAREST TREE WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS DIMENSION |
| | SHALL BE AT LEAST 10 FEET. |
| | |
| | 5) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ON "SURVEY" SHEET 15 OF 19 |
| | DOES NOT MATCH THE LOCATION SHOWN ON SHEET 025 OF 029. |
| | BASED ON THE SURVEY, BORE PIT 04+92 AND PORTIONS OF THE |
| | BORE ARE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT |
| | PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 6) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ON "SURVEY" SHEET 16 OF 19 |
| | DOES NOT MATCH THE LOCATION SHOWN ON SHEET 026 OF 029. |
| | BASED ON THE SURVEY, HANDHOLE 08+12 AND THE BORE ARE |
| | LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 7) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ON "SURVEY" SHEETS 16 AND 17 |
| | OF 19 DOES NOT MATCH THE LOCATION SHOWN ON SHEET 027 OF |
| | 029. BASED ON THE SURVEY, BORE PIT 12+12, HANDHOLE |
| | 14+60 AND THE BORE ARE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, |
| | WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. ADDITIONALLY, THE CONTOURS OF |
| | THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DIFFER ON THE SURVEY AND PLANS |
| | (90-DEGREE VS CURVED). |
| | |
| | 8) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ON "SURVEY" SHEET 17 AND 18 OF |
| | 19 DOES NOT MATCH THE LOCATION SHOWN ON SHEET 028 OF |
| | 029 (ALSO DOES NOT MATCH SURVEYS THAT THE CITY HAS ON |
| | FILE). BASED ON THE SURVEY, BORE PIT 18+62 AND THE BORE |
| | ARE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT |
| | PERMITTED. THE BORE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ROSEMARY |
| | AVENUE AND FERN STREET CLEARLY ENCROACHES ONTO PRIVATE |
| | PROPERTY ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN. ADDITIONALLY, THE |
| | ENGINEERING PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE CURRENT CONDITIONS |
| | OF FERN STREET EAST OF ROSEMARY AVENUE BASED ON THE |
| | RECENT RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADWAY BY THE 360 |
| | ROSEMARY PROJECT. THE PLANS MUST SHOW CURRENT ACCURATE |
| | CONDITIONS SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PROPOSE |
| | INSTALLATIONS DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THE STREETSCAPE |
| | ELEMENTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LANDSCAPE AREA UTILIZES |
| | A STRUCTURAL SOIL SYSTEM EXTENDING OUT FROM THE TREE |
| | PITS THAT MAY NOT BE DISTURBED BY THE BORE OR OTHER |
| | EXCAVATIONS SUCH AS TRENCHING OR SETTING A HANDHOLE. |
| | THE PROPOSED TRENCH AND HANDHOLE 22+13 APPEAR TO BE IN |
| | DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A TREE AND THE STRUCTURAL SOIL ARE |
| | IT IS PLANTED IN. |
| | |
| | 9) THE FILES TITLED AS 014B PLAN & PROFILE AND 017 |
| | RUNNING LINES, UPLOADED ON JULY 21, 2022, ARE FROM THE |
| | NORTH OF FERN STREET SECTION OF THIS PROJECT, WHICH DO |
| | NOT SEEM TO BE WHAT THIS PERMIT IS COVERING AND SHOULD |
| | BE REMOVED FROM THIS SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 10) THE CITY HAS APPROVED A NEW PROJECT LOCATED AT 515 |
| | FERN STREET. STAFF CAN PROVIDE A COPY OF THE APPROVED |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO THE PROPOSED HANDHOLE 25+23 CAN BE |
| | LOCATED SO AS NOT TO INTERFERE WITH THE PROPOSED |
| | LANDSCAPE AREAS. NOTE: THE PROPOSED LOCATION MAY NOT |
| | PRESENT PROBLEMS, BUT STAFF IS UNABLE TO TELL BY |
| | COMPARING THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 11) THE BORE, BORE PITS AND HANDHOLES ARE ONLY |
| | PERMITTED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN A GENERAL UTILITY |
| | EASEMENT. THE SURVEY DOES NOT SHOW A GENERAL UTILITY |
| | EASEMENT AT ANY OF THE LOCATION LISTED AS HAVING |
| | ENCROACHMENTS ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 12) ROSEMARY AVENUE AND CLEMATIS STREET ARE CITY OF |
| | WEST PALM BEACH CONTROLLED RIGHTS-OF-WAY, SO THE DETAIL |
| | SHEETS NEED TO BE THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD |
| | DETAILS, NOT THE PALM BEACH COUNTY DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 13) THE TUBULAR MARKERS ARE NOT PERMITTED. MARKERS MAY |
| | ONLY BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE HANDHOLES OR OTHERWISE |
| | BURIED. |
| | |
| | 14) THE BORE DEPTH FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE PROJECT IS |
| | SUFFICIENT TO AVOID TREE ROOTS. THE AREA THAT NEEDS |
| | ADDITIONAL CLARITY IS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERN STREET. |
| | |
| | 15) THE MOT PLANS SHALL NOT BE REUPLOADED WITH THIS |
| | PERMIT. THEY ARE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE FUTURE |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
