Date |
Text |
2022-06-27 13:58:50 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| |
| 1) THERE IS AN INDICATION WITHIN THE SCOPE OF WORK TO |
| REMOVE INTERIOR PARTITION WALL ON FIRST FLOOR. |
| |
| HOWEVER,SHEET A 3 INDICATES AN INDICATION OF SCOPE OF |
| WORK ONLY WITH AN ARROW AND CIRCLE AROUND 2 SINKS. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT AS TO WHICH STATEMENT, (OR |
| BOTH) IS ARE CORRECT AND MAKE THE APPLICABLE CHANGES. |
| |
| |
| |
| 2) THERE IS AN INDICATION OF A NEW WALL ON THE |
| MEZZANINE WITH AN OPENING, HOWEVER THERE ARE NO |
| DIMENSIONS INDICATING THE HEIGHT AND WIDTH OF THE |
| OPENING THAT MEETS THE MINIMUM MEANS OF EGRESS |
| REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS. |
| |
| |
| |
| 3) SHEET A 4 - THERE IS AN INDICATION OF A NEW WALL, |
| HOWEVER, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF THE MODIFICATION OF |
| THE FIRE SPRINKLER HEAD LOCATION/PROTECTION. |
| |
| |
| THE REMOVAL AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW SPACES/AREAS |
| REQUIRE A REVIEW BY A FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR FOR |
| MODIFICATIONS. |
| |
| A FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO REVIEW THE |
| PROPOSED WORK TO ENSURE CODE COMPLIANT COVERAGE IS |
| MAINTAINED. |
| |
| SHOULD NO WORK BE REQUIRED, A LETTER FROM THAT |
| CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED ON FINAL |
| FIRE INSPECTIONS TO THE FIRE INSPECTOR. |
| |
| |
| THE FIRE SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS SHALL BE |
| MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT DEMO & CONSTRUCTION PERIODS |
| |
| ANY WORK ON THE FIRE SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM, INCLUDING |
| DEMO, SHALL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS & SHOP |
| DRAWINGS. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE A NOTE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| 5) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| PETER LEDUC |
| FIRE MARSHAL |
| 561-804-4709 |
| [email protected] |
| |