Plan Review Notes For Permit 22040649 |
Permit Number |
22040649 |
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
Sequence Number |
1 |
|
Notes |
Date |
Text |
2022-05-24 13:59:09 | 5/25/22 NEW PLAN WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE NOW IN FILE.MP | | | | SIGNATURE REVIEW FAILED | | | | IT APPEARS THE DRAWING SUBMITTED IS NOT SEALED AND | | SIGNED AS REQUIRED. | | PLANS SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY MUST BE DIGITALLY SIGNED | | AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT OF RECORD. | | PLEASE FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS OUTLINED BELOW TO CORRECT | | THIS ISSUE. | | FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR | | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE | | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS OR DIGITALLY SEALED AND | | SIGNED. | | EITHER UPLOAD A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED PLAN | | TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER WITH YOUR RESUBMITTAL (IF | | APPLICABLE) AND COMPLETE THE UPLOAD TASK IN PROJECTDOX, | | OR YOU CAN SUBMIT ONE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER | | ORIGINAL WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO THE BUILDING | | DEPARTMENT. | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. | | | | SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS ARE TYPICALLY REVIEWED WITHIN TWO | | BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SUBMITTAL; DIGITALLY SIGNED | | DOCUMENTS ARE PREFERRED. | | PLEASE EMAIL [email protected] AND CC TO | | [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS | | MICHAEL PETERSON | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | |
|