Date |
Text |
2022-01-28 12:46:05 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| |
| 1) THERE IS AN INDICATION OF A FIRE SPRINKLER |
| PROTECTION; HOWEVER, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF FIRE |
| SPRINKLER DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED BY F.A.C 61G |
| |
| FAC 61G15-32.002 DEFINES THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| ENGINEERING DOCUMENT (5) AS WELL AS THE FIRE PROTECTION |
| SYSTEM LAYOUT DOCUMENT (6). 61G15-32.003 |
| OUTLINES THE COMMON REQUIREMENTS TO ALL FIRE |
| PROTECTIONS ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS WITH 32.004 (2) (A-J) |
| OUTLINING THE MINIMUM INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED ON |
| FIRE |
| PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS FOR WATER BASED |
| SYSTEMS. AS STATED IN THE DEFINITIONS, THE CONTRACTOR |
| IS TO DEVELOP THE LAYOUT DOCUMENTS BASED ON THE DESIGN |
| CRITERIA PROVIDED IN THE FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING |
| DOCUMENTS BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE FIRE |
| SPRINKLER SYSTEM. THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| ENGINEERING |
| DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED FOR THE MASTER PERMIT (BUILDING |
| PERMIT PER FBC) AND THE LAYOUT DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED |
| FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER INSTALLATION PERMIT. |
| |
| EVEN IF THE EOR DEFERS TO A LOCAL QUALIFIED CONTRACTOR, |
| THAT CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT THE REQUIRED 61G |
| INFORMATION WITH THIS MASTER. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW AND SUBMIT THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. |
| |
| |
| 2) THERE IS NO INDICATION OF THE REQUIRED FIRE RATING |
| SEPARATION OF THE 1ST/2ND FLOOR. |
| |
| PER NFPA 101 CH 6 A 2 HOUR SEPARATION IS REQUIRED |
| BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL & MERCANTILE AND STORAGE. |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE REQUIRED SEPARATION. |
| |
| |
| |
| 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| PETER LEDUC |
| FIRE MARSHAL |
| 561-804-4709 |
| [email protected] |
| |