Date |
Text |
2022-01-31 17:55:31 | FAILED |
| |
| 1) THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 2) PLEASE RELOCATE THE POLE IN LINE WITH THE EXISTING |
| STREETLIGHT POLE (CLOSER TO THE CURB). THIS WILL PERMIT |
| THE INSTALLATION OF A FULL WIDTH SIDEWALK THAT IS NOT |
| OBSTRUCTED BY THE POLE AT SUCH TIME THAT THE ADJACENT |
| PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED. |
| . |
| 3) THE POLE HEIGHT SHOWN ON SHEET C-3 LISTS THE HEIGHT |
| TO THE TOP OF THE ANTENNA AS 28 FEET ABOVE GRADE; |
| HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN AND SURVEY CALL OUT A POLE 32 |
| FEET ABOVE GRADE LEVEL. ALL SHEETS MUST SHOW |
| CONSISTENT, ACCURATE INFORMATION. NOTE: THE 32-FOOT |
| HEIGHT IS CONSISTENT WITH ONE OF THE NEARBY POWER |
| POLES. |
| |
| 4) THE HANDHOLE AND BORE PIT NOTES ON SHEET P-1 STATE |
| THAT THE SIDEWALK WILL BE RESTORED; HOWEVER, THESE ARE |
| IN LANDSCAPED AREAS AND NOT OVERLAPPING WITH A |
| SIDEWALK. PLEASE UPDATE THE NOTATIONS ACCORDINGLY. |
| |
| 5) THE PLANS SHOW THE BORE PITS BEING DUG WITH AN |
| UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE RUNNING THROUGH THEM AND THE |
| HANDHOLE INSTALLED ON TOP OF A COMCAST LINE. IN ORDER |
| TO VERIFY THAT THE INSTALLATION WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH |
| THE EXISTING FACILITIES, PROVIDE A PUBLIC UTILITY |
| LETTER OF NO OBJECTION FROM FPL AND COMCAST REGARDING |
| THE INSTALLATION. |
| |
| 6) PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC |
| BORE FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE INSTALLATION. THE |
| UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC MUST BE CLEARLY SHOWN AVOIDING THE |
| UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IT CROSSES (EX: WATER, |
| SANITARY, ELECTRIC, AND CABLE) AND THE EXISTING PALM |
| TREE ROOT STRUCTURE. |
| |
| CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| [email protected] |
| |