Date |
Text |
2022-03-16 13:46:01 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| COMMENTS |
| CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| PERMIT #21090688. |
| |
| ******IMPORTANT***** |
| THERE WAS A MISTAKE WHEN UPLOADING DRAWINGS TO |
| PROJECTDOX. DRAWING S-2 WAS UPLOADED AND VERSIONED WITH |
| FOUNDATION DRAWING S-1. NEED TO UPLOAD DRAWING DRAWING |
| S-1 AGAIN AND VERSIONED WITH CORRECT FILE. |
| |
| |
| NOTE: |
| NEED RETAINING WALL PERMIT AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT |
| TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 1- LOT DRAINAGE |
| PROVIDE COMPLETE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| THE FOLLOWING: SEC. R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. |
| 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| NOTE: PROPOSED ADDITIONS ARE TO CLOSE TO THE NEIGHBOR |
| ON THE EAST SIDE. DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW THE EXISTING |
| AND PROPOSED GRADE ELEVATIONS SHOWING HOW KEEPING WATER |
| AWAY FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| DRAINAGE PLAN ON SHEET DR-1 NOW SHOWS THE PROPOSED |
| ADDITION WITH A FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF 12.44" FOR |
| THE 2 STORY ADDITION AND 12' FOR THE GARAGE ADDITION. |
| DRAINAGE PLAN DOESN'T SHOW THE PROPOSED GRADE |
| ELEVATIONS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THESE TWO ADDITIONS. |
| DRAINAGE PLAN ONLY SHOWS AN EXISTING 10.84 GRADE |
| ELEVATION WHERE THE PROPOSED 2 STORY ADDITION IS GOING |
| TO BE BUILT. THERE IS A CONCERN FOR DRAINAGE IN THE |
| NARROW AREA BETWEEN THE NEW BUILDINGS AND THE 5'-1" |
| SETBACK BECAUSE OF THE ADDITION PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR |
| ELEVATION. |
| DRAINAGE PLAN SPECIFIES A RETAINING WALL ON THE EAST |
| SIDE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. NOTE: CLEARLY INDICATE ON |
| PLAN THE EXTEND OF RETAINING WALL AND PROVIDE |
| STRUCTURAL DETAIL OF WALL. HOW IS THE STACKED BLOCK |
| REINFORCED TO STAY IN PLACE. SEC. R301.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ALSO, PROVIDE SECTION/DETAIL AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS WITH GRADE ELEVATIONS SHOWING HOW |
| DIVERTING SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM THE FOUNDATION (SEC. |
| R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL). |
| NOTE: SINCE THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL AFFECTS THE |
| FOUNDATION WORK, THEN THE RETAINING WALL PERMIT NEEDS |
| TO BE COORDINATED WITH THIS PERMIT TO AVOID |
| CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| |
| 2-OK. |
| 3-OK. |
| 4-OK. |
| |
| 5-DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF INTERIOR |
| HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAIL AND FOR BALCONY GUARDRAIL |
| SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE R301.5, SEC. R311.7.8 AND |
| SEC. R312.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| 6-OK. |
| 7-OK. |
| 8- OK. |
| 9- OK. |
| 9- OK. |
| 10- OK. |
| 11- OK. |
| 12- OK. |
| |
| 13- SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S-2: |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR RED IRON |
| STEEL BUCKET SUPPORTING NEW 2 PLY GIRDER TRUSSES (TWO |
| TRUSS GIRDERS. SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS). CLEARLY SPECIFY |
| BUCKET SIZE AND FASTENERS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| NO CLEAR ON BUCKET MATERIAL, SIZE AND FASTENERS. |
| SPECIFICATIONS ON BUCK DETAIL ON SAME SHEET AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS ON FLOOR FRAMING PLAN DON'T MATCH. |
| CLARIFY AND REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 14- OK. |
| 15- OK. |
| |
| 16-DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR: |
| (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW |
| PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS.) |
| A)HARDIE PLANK SIDING AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| B)EXTERIOR DOOR. DESIGN PRESSURES ON PLASTPRO DOOR |
| FL17347.15 SUBMITTED DON'T MEET THE CALCULATED DESIGN |
| PRESSURES. ALSO, CLARIFY WHERE IS THIS DOOR GOING TO BE |
| INSTALLED. |
| C)WINDOW MULLIONS (NOTE: NEED TO SPECIFY MULLION SIZE |
| TO AVOID DELAYS/CONFLICTS). |
| D)COLONIAL SHUTTERS A SHOWN ON PLANS AND PROVIDE |
| INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. |
| E)ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON ONE & TWO STORY |
| WALL SECTIONS. |
| F)GABLE VENTS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| G)METAL ROOFING. |
| H)FRENCH DOORS. |
| I)HORIZONTAL ROLLER WINDOWS. |
| J)ENTRY DOORS |
| K) OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR. |
| |
| 17-ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 18- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| A)IT LOOKS LIKE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE DONE FOR |
| THE ENTIRE HOUSE (EXISTING AND PROPOSED). A/C SQUARE |
| FOOTAGE SHOWN ON ITEM #6 IS ONLY FOR THE TWO STORY |
| ADDITION. REVISE CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| (REVISED WILL NEED TO BE SIGNED BY ARCHITECT AS DONE |
| WITH THIS SUBMITTAL). |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| B)OK. |
| C)OK. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| D)REVISE ITEM #9(A). THERE IS NO RAISED FLOOR IN THIS |
| HOUSE. RAISED FLOOR APPLIES WHEN THERE IS A NON A/C |
| SPACE BELOW. FIRST FLOOR IS AIR CONDITIONED. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| E)REVISE ITEM #11(A). ATTIC AREA IS NOT 2992 S.F. |
| COORDINATE WITH ITEM #18(A) ABOVE AND REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| F)OK. |
| G)OK. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| H)REVISE THE ATTIC VENT RATIO ON PAGE 2. TYPICALLY, THE |
| RATIO IS 1/150 NOT 1/300. SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| OR PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE |
| COMPLETE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| THE 1/300 RATIO AS REQUIRED BY THE EXCEPTION ON SEC. |
| R806.2. NOTE: ARCHITECT OF RECORD NEEDS TO REVISE PLANS |
| PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| I)DOORS INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 IS INCORRECT. NOTE: DOORS |
| TO BE CONSIDERED ARE ONLY THE DOORS SEPARATING THE |
| NON-A/C AREAS FROM A/C AREAS. OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR IS |
| NOT CONSIDERED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| ALSO, CLARIFY WHERE IS THE OTHER 2X7 INSULATED DOOR |
| LOCATED?. PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY INSULATED DOOR ON THE |
| WEST SIDE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| J)REVISE WINDOWS OVERHANG SEPARATION TO MATCH PLANS. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| K)OK. |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |