Date |
Text |
2021-10-03 08:41:31 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) |
| FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL |
| |
| BECAUSE IT APPEARS THAT THE APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT ONE |
| OF THE SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS SHOULD HAVE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| FOR OPENING 3 (AS WELL AS THE SLIDING GLASS DOOR), |
| PROVIDE A FLOOR PLAN PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER WHICH |
| TIES THE OPENINGS TO THE DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED. |
| |
| FROM PREVIOUS LISTS, NO NEW DOCUMENTS UPLOADED FOR 3RD |
| SUBMITTAL EXCEPT FOR A FLOOR PLAN WHICH STILL HAS TWO |
| OPENINGS MARKED #3. |
| |
| SEE THE ENGINEERING; YOU HAVE WHAT THE ENGINEER REFERS |
| TO AS "MARK 1-2, 4-5" AND ALSO "MARK 3". MARKS 1-2 AND |
| 4-5 REQUIRE DESIGN PRESSURES OF +62.7/-62.7. SUBMIT A |
| FLOOR PLAN PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER THAT CLEARLY SHOWS |
| WHICH OPENINGS CORRELATE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| |
| THE FLOOR PLAN PREPARED BY THE CONTRACTOR HAS TWO |
| OPENINGS LABELED AS #3, AND THE PRODUCT APPROVAL OPTION |
| FOR -60/+80 MARKED ON PAGE 2 OF THE SINGLE HUNG PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL. THIS IS THE 3RD REVIEW OF THE SAME DOCMENTS. |
| |
| REVISE THE SINGLE HUNG PRODUCT APPROVAL ON DRAWING PAGE |
| 2 SO THAT YOU INDICATE THAT +80/-80 OPTION IS PROPOSED, |
| OR HAVE THE ENGINEER REDUCE THE REQUIRED PRESSURES. THE |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL PROPOSES THE STANDARD SILL, BUT THE |
| STANDARD SILL HAS A LIMITATION OF -60/+80. THE HI-RISE |
| FRAME SILL HAS A DESIGN PRESSURE LIMITATION OF -80/+80. |
| |
| |
| |