| Date |
Text |
| 2022-02-14 10:48:52 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 5 TH REVIEW: FBC SEVENTH EDITION (2020) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING - THE PROPOSED SCREEN FABRIC IMPACT |
| | PROTECTION DEVICE HAS A MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES OF +/- |
| | 60 PSF WHICH IS LESS THAN THE REQUIRED OPENING |
| | PRESSURES. WE ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE ROLL UP AND FABRIC |
| | SHUTTERS ARE NOT BEING INSTALLED TO PROVIDE IMPACT |
| | PROTECTION. OUR CONCERN IS THAT THE DEVICES REMAIN |
| | INTACT AND NOT BECOME DETACHED DURING A WIND EVENT. THE |
| | ROLL UP SHUTTERS ARE DESIGNED TO BE INSTALLED ON AN |
| | ENCLOSED BUILDING AND THE FABRIC PANEL WILL ALLOW THE |
| | WIND INTO THE INTERIOR OF THE GAZEBO WHICH WILL |
| | INCREASE THE PRESSURE ON THE INTERNAL SIDE OF THE ROLL |
| | UP SHUTTERS. THE INTERNAL PRESSURE WILL BE GREATER THAN |
| | THE CONFIGURATION TESTED FOR THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. YOU |
| | MAY WISH TO LOOK AT OTHER OPTIONS, POSSIBLY ROLL UP |
| | GARAGE DOORS. |
| | |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS BELOW FOR REFERENCE |
| | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 4 TH REVIEW: FBC SEVENTH EDITION (2020) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | COMMENTS FROM THE 3RD REVIEW WERE NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NOTE: IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE CITY BUILDING DIVISION |
| | THAT THESE ROLL-UP STORM SHUTTERS PROPOSED FOR THE ROOF |
| | TOP GAZEBO ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED BY THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | 1) PROVIDE A LETTER FROM A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER |
| | AFFIRMING THAT THE INSTALLATION OF THESE ROLL-UP STORM |
| | SHUTTERS WILL NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE HOST |
| | STRUCTURE WHEN IN USE DURING A WIND EVENT. FBC |
| | 107.2.1.2 |
| | |
| | 2) PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER EXPLAIN THE SUBSTANTIAL |
| | PRESSURE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR |
| | OPENING #1 AND THE OTHER OPENINGS. ESPECIALLY OPENING |
| | #5 WHICH IS IN THE SAME WALL ZONE AND IS 134.5 SQFT |
| | COMPARED TO 202.5 SQFT. FBC 107.2.1.2 |
| | |
| | 3) THE CUSTOM MOUNT DETAIL FOR OPENING #1 SHOWS ADDING |
| | AN ALUMINUM ANGLE TO THE END RETENTION TRACK. I BELIEVE |
| | THAT YOU INTEND THIS TO INCREASE THE DESIGN PRESSURE OF |
| | THE ROLL-UP SHUTTERS. THE ENGINEER WILL NEED TO PROVIDE |
| | A RATIONAL ANALYSIS THAT EXPLAINS HOW THIS WILL |
| | INCREASE THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF THE PRODUCT. THE |
| | ENGINEER WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT |
| | FOR THE ROLL-UP SHUTTERS THAT INDICATES THE MODE OF |
| | FAILURE. THE REPORT NEEDS TO SHOW WHICH COMPONENT OF |
| | THE ROLL-UP FAILED. IF IT IS THE SLATS THAT FAILED WHEN |
| | TESTED, REINFORCING THE RETENTION TRACK WILL NOT |
| | INCREASE THE PRODUCT'S DESIGN PRESSURE. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH |
| | OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
