Date |
Text |
2022-07-25 17:47:23 | FAILED |
| |
| REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS. |
| *** NO WRITTEN RESPONSE PROVIDED. |
| |
| 1) THE PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THIS TOWER PERMIT DO NOT |
| MATCH THE PLANS THAT WERE TO BE APPROVED AS PART OF THE |
| LATEST MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT OR THE |
| APPROVED FOUNDATION PERMIT. ALL PLANS WILL NEED TO SHOW |
| THE LATEST CODE COMPLIANT CONDITIONS AND BE INTERNALLY |
| CONSISTENT. DUE TO THE PLAN CHANGES, PLANNING WILL HOLD |
| OFF ON THE FORMAL ISSUANCE OF THE MINOR PLANNED |
| DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT UNTIL THE VERTICAL PERMIT PLANS |
| ARE APPROVED. AT SUCH TIME, PLANNING WILL REQUEST TWO |
| SETS OF THE APPROVED PLANS, INCLUDING AN ELECTRONIC |
| COPY, SO THAT THE MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT |
| CAN BE ISSUED. |
| |
| 2) REPEAT COMMENT: IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. |
| 13-19, PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT ALL SURFACES OF THE |
| BUILDING'S EXTERIOR FACADE, TO INCLUDE GLAZING, ARE |
| DESIGNED OR TREATED TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACTS OF GLARE |
| AND REFLECTION OF HIGH INTENSITY LIGHT FROM THE |
| BUILDING'S FACADE ONTO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. |
| |
| 3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE AN FAA EXTENSION LETTER FOR |
| THE BUILDING. THE LETTER THAT STAFF HAS ON FILE EXPIRED |
| IN JANUARY 2022. |
| |
| 4) REPEAT COMMENT: SHEET 00.200 REFERENCES SAUNA SQUARE |
| FOOTAGE ON THE ROOF LEVEL. ROOFTOP SAUNAS ARE |
| CONSIDERED AMENITIES AND ARE NOT PERMITTED TO EXCEED |
| THE HEIGHT OF THE ROOF DECK (300 FEET). ALL SAUNA |
| REFERENCES AND FACILITIES MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE |
| ENTIRE PLAN SET. |
| |
| 5) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SURVEY PROVIDED A S-1-00 IS NOT |
| THE LATEST SURVEY THAT WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE |
| FOUNDATION PERMIT. THE LATEST, ACCURATE SURVEY IS |
| REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED WITH THE PLANS. |
| |
| 6) REPEAT COMMENT: THE CIVIL PLANS ARE NOT THE VERSION |
| THAT WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPROVED FOUNDATION PERMIT. |
| ALL PERMITS NEED TO INCLUDE THE SAME LATEST, ACCURATE |
| PLANS. |
| |
| 7) UPDATED COMMENT: THE PLANS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE |
| MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT SHOW THE WEST |
| SETBACK DIMENSION OF 5 FEET 6 INCHES FOR THE GENERATOR |
| PIT, WHICH WAS ALSO REFLECTED ON THE APPROVED |
| FOUNDATION PERMIT. THE SHEET 1.100 PROVIDED RECENTLY TO |
| PLANNING STAFF SHOWS A SETBACK OF 5 FEET 7 INCHES. THIS |
| PERMIT SHOWS A WEST SETBACK OF 5 FEET 3 INCHES (OCCURS |
| ON SHEETS A1.100 AND A1.1B1). THE PERMITS AND MINOR |
| PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT NEED TO INCLUDE THE SAME |
| LATEST, ACCURATE PLANS. NOTE: THE PLAN ORIGINALLY |
| APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION SHOWED A SETBACK FOR |
| THE GENERATOR PIT OF 5 FEET EVEN. |
| |
| 8) REPEAT COMMENT: SHEET A1.1B1 DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| APPROVED FOUNDATION PERMIT RESUBMITTAL. ALL PERMITS |
| NEED TO INCLUDE THE SAME LATEST, ACCURATE PLANS. *** |
| THE SETBACK DISCREPANCY FROM COMMENT #7 IS ONE EXAMPLE. |
| |
| 9) REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE BUILDING |
| INCREASED FROM A NORTH/SOUTH DIMENSION OF 137 FEET 5 |
| INCHES ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN TO 137 FEET 9 INCHES ON |
| THE TOWER PLAN WITHOUT IMPACTING THE SIDE SETBACKS? |
| NOTE THE MINIMUM SETBACKS MUST BE MAINTAINED. SHOWN ON |
| SHEET A1.1B1. |
| |
| 10) UPDATED COMMENT: THE ORIGINALLY APPROVED PLANS |
| SHOWED THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING WITH A FLAT |
| EASTERN FACADE. THE MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT |
| SUBMITTAL AND APPROVED FOUNDATION PERMIT LIFE SAFETY |
| PLAN SHOW A CURVED EASTERN FACADE. SOME OF THE PLANS |
| SUBMITTED WITH THIS PERMIT SHOW THE FLAT EASTERN FACADE |
| AGAIN, WHILE OTHERS (EX. PLUMBING). PLEASE CLARIFY |
| WHICH VERSION IS CORRECT. ALL PERMITS NEED TO INCLUDE |
| THE SAME LATEST, ACCURATE PLANS. IF THE PLAN IS FOR A |
| FLAT FACADE, THEN THE FOUNDATION PERMIT SET NEEDS TO BE |
| REVISED. |
| |
| 11) REPEAT COMMENT: THE DIMENSION LINES LISTED TO THE |
| COLUMNS DO NOT ACTUALLY REACH THE COLUMNS. |
| |
| 12) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE SETBACKS FROM THE FACE |
| OF GLASS TO THE PROPERTY LINE FOR EACH FLOOR PLAN. THIS |
| WAS SHOWN ON THE MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT |
| PLAN. |
| |
| 13) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS DO NOT MATCH |
| THE ONES SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE MINOR PLANNED |
| DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. ALL SUBMITTALS NEED TO INCLUDE |
| THE SAME LATEST, ACCURATE PLANS. |
| |
| 14) THE FOLLOWING ITEMS REQUIRE REVIEW AS SEPARATE |
| PERMITS WITH PLANS: |
| |
| A. THE WALLS, FENCES, GATES AND COLUMNS |
| B. HARDSCAPE, INCLUDING PAVERS, ARTIFICIAL TURF, DOG |
| PARK ITEMS, BENCHES/PLAZA AREA, ETC. |
| C. LANDSCAPE |
| D. IRRIGATION |
| E. GENERATOR |
| F. WATER FEATURES |
| G. PARKING STRIPING |
| H. SITE LIGHTING, INCLUDING BOLLARDS, NOTE: SINCE |
| ACACIA ROAD IS A SEPARATE PARCEL, IT REQUIRES ITS OWN |
| PERMIT FOR THE LIGHTING, BUT MAY BE INCLUDED ON ONE SET |
| OF PLANS FOR BOTH PERMIT NUMBERS. PHOTOMETRIC PLANS ARE |
| REQUIRED WITH THE PERMITS. |
| I. BICYCLE RACKS, INCLUDES WITHIN THE BICYCLE STORAGE |
| ROOM. |
| J. EV CHARGING STATIONS |
| |
| CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |