Date |
Text |
2021-11-01 15:00:58 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) |
| FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL |
| |
| 1. FBC B 1609, FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| |
| MARK PRODUCT APPROVALS TO SHOW OPTION SELECTED, BUT |
| OPTIONS MUST MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY THE |
| ENGINEER. NOTE IF THE OPTION IS FOR ZONE 4 OR ZONE 5 AS |
| IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE OPENINGS FOR FIXED, SINGLE |
| HUNG, AND SGD IN BOTH ZONES. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW - THE SGD PRODUCT APPROVAL IS NOT MARKED. A |
| NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS UPLOADED NOTHING IS MARKED. |
| |
| FIXED WINDOW OPTION OK FOR THE MOST CURRENT DOCUMENT |
| UPLOADED ON 10/21 BUT THE PRODUCT APPROVAL UPLOADED |
| (NAMED NOA.PDF) IS INCOMPLETE; IT IS MISSING THE FIRST |
| PAGE. THERE ARE TWO OTHER DOCUMENTS FOR A FIXED WINDOW |
| NAMED "NOA FIXED.PDF" AND "PRODUCT APPROVAL - WINDOWS |
| FIXED FL26095-R3.PDF" AND "PRODUCT APPROVAL.PDF". IT IS |
| NOT CLEAR WHICH OF THE THREE IS PROPOSED; PLEASE ADVISE |
| WHICH THREE SHOULD BE DELETED. IT APPEARS THAT |
| "NOA.PDF" IS THE MOST CURRENT DOCUMENT AND THE OTHER |
| THREE SHOULD BE DELETED, PLEASE CONFIRM. |
| |
| IT DOES NOT APPEAR A NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SINGLE |
| HUNG WINDOW WAS NOT SUBMITTED. |
| |
| 2. SEE SHEET A1.0, ALUMINUM WINDOWS AND SGD ARE |
| PROPOSED, BUT VINYL PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED. |
| REVISE. THE SCHEDULE DOES NOT APPEAR TO CORRELATE WITH |
| THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED, PLEASE ADVISE WHICH |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS SHOULD BE DELETED. THERE SHOULD BE |
| THREE PRODUCT APPROVALS (SGD, FIXED, S/H) BUT 8 WERE |
| UPLOADED. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |