Date |
Text |
2022-02-24 13:28:20 | ** FAILED ** |
| |
| PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE |
| COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE |
| APPLICABLE: |
| |
| 1.) THIS PROPERTY IS PART OF A PROPOSED REZONING FOR A |
| COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD), CURRENTLY IN |
| REVIEW BY STAFF, AND REQUIRES CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL. |
| THE PROPOSED WALL IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT SITE |
| DESIGN FOR THE CPD AND CONFLICTS WITH THE REQUIRED 5 |
| FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE |
| FOR THE PROPOSED CPD. (REFERENCE: PLANNING BOARD CASE |
| NO. 1878). |
| |
| [6/29/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: TO DATE, STAFF HAS NOT |
| RECEIVED THE RESUBMITTAL FOR THE CPD APPLICATION. ALL |
| PLANS MUST MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY AND MUST ALSO |
| DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| ZLDRS (I.E. PLACEMENT AND SETBACK DISTANCE). ZONING |
| SIGN-OFF FOR THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BE GRANTED UNTIL |
| PLANS MATCH THE PROPOSED CPD APPLICATION FOR |
| CONSISTENCY. PERMIT TO PROCEED AT THE APPLICANT?S OWN |
| RISK.] |
| |
| |
| 2.) ILLUSTRATE THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WALL |
| IN PLANS AS IT RELATES TO THE SCOPE OF THIS PERMIT AND |
| SHOW SETBACK DIMENSION(S) FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. |
| PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED WALL MUST MEET THE |
| MINIMUM SETBACK DISTANCE OF 5 FT. FROM THE FRONT |
| PROPERTY LINES. THERE IS ALSO AN INCONSISTENCY IN THE |
| PLANS PROVIDED IN THE PERMIT: ONE PLAN STATES THAT THE |
| WALL WILL BE ON THE PROPERTY LINE AND ANOTHER PLAN |
| SHOWS THE PROPOSED WALL INSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| THE PLANS CANNOT BE IN CONFLICT; ADDRESS FOR |
| CONSISTENCY [ZLDR S.94-145] |
| |
| |
| 3.) SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY IS OUTDATED AND IS NOT |
| SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED LAND |
| SURVEYOR. PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY. |
| |
| [6/29/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. SURVEY STILL |
| OUTDATED AND NOT SIGNED AND SEALED.] |
| |
| |
| 4.) IF THE PROPOSED WALL IS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| PROPOSED CPD: A) SITE PLAN MUST BE UPDATED TO REFLECT |
| AS SUCH. B) PLAN MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE SETBACK DISTANCE |
| FROM THE PROPERTY LINE(S). SETBACK DISTANCE AND WALL |
| HEIGHT SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IN |
| SEC. 94-302(C) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). THERE ARE INCONSISTENCIES DETECTED |
| WITH THE PROPOSED LOCATION AND HEIGHT OF THE WALL WITH |
| THE ZLDRS. |
| |
| [6/29/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF IS STILL WAITING ON |
| THE RESUBMITTAL FOR THE PROPOSED CPD. PLANS MUST MATCH |
| FOR CONSISTENCY.] |
| |
| |
| |
| NOTES: |
| |
| * ANY REVISIONS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| |
| * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| QUESTIONS. |
| |
| * ZONE: GC |
| |
| * REFERENCE PB CASE NO. 1878 (GREENE SCHOOL CPD - IN |
| REVIEW). |
| |