Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 21050513
Permit Number 21050513
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2022-07-18 15:19:57RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW
 COMMENTS
 CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
 PERMIT #21050513
  
 1- OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 2- LOT DRAINAGE (SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING)
 PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 FOLLOWING:
 R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 GRADE ELEVATIONS SHOWING HOW KEEPING WATER AWAY FROM
 ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL.
  
 3- OK.
  
 4- SHEET S1.1 (NOTE: CHANGE OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. NEW
 DRAWINGS S-1 THRU S-6 SUBMITTED):
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 (A)PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN: PROVIDE LAYOUT OF ROOMS ADJACENT
 TO THE PROPOSED ADDITION. NEED THIS TO VERIFY IF THERE
 ARE BEDROOMS ADJACENT TO THE ADDITION AND EXISTING
 EGRESS REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT CHANGED OR BLOCKED.
 SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REVISED PLANS SHOW EXISTING BEDROOM ADJACENT TO THE
 ADDITION. ACCORDING TO PLAN SUBMITTED THERE IS AN
 EXISTING DOOR LEADING TO THE OUTSIDE. THE PROPOSED
 ADDITION IS BLOCKING THE BEDROOM EMERGENCY EGRESS. NEED
 TO SHOW EMERGENCY ESCAPE COMPLIANCE FOR EXISTING
 BEDROOM. CLEARLY SPECIFY IF THERE IS ANY EXISTING
 WINDOW COMPLYING WITH SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 SPECIFY WINDOW TYPE AND SIZE (WIDTH X HEIGHT)
  
 (B)OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 (C)REVISE DESIGN CRITERIA: WIND EXPOSURE DOESN'T MATCH
 WIND EXPOSURE IN TRUSS NOTE #1 ON SHEET S1.2. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
 SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REVISED PLANS ARE MISSING THE WIND EXPOSURE.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 (D)DESIGN CRITERIA SPECIFIES: FULLY OPEN DESIGN AND
 INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT = N/A. THIS BUILDING IS
 NOT OPEN. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. R301.2.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REVISED PLANS ARE MISSING THIS INFORMATION.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 (E)REVISE BUILDING CATEGORY. THIS BUILDING IS NOT
 CATEGORY I. IT IS CATEGORY II. SEE SEC. 1604.5
 FBC-BUILDING.
 SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REVISED PLANS ARE MISSING THIS INFORMATION.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 (F) FOUNDATION PLAN DOESN'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 CONCRETE SLAB. PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS. FOOTING
 SIZE, REINFORCEMENT, VAPOR BARRIER, ETC.
 SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT CLEAR. THERE ARE SEVERAL
 DIFFERENT DETAILS SUBMITTED SHOWING NEW CONCRETE SLAB
 OVER EXISTING. THIS INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH PROPOSED
 ADDITION. PROVIDE ONLY THE DETAILS THAT APPLY TO THIS
 JOB. ALSO, TYPE OF FOOTING AND PROPOSED EXTERIOR WALLS
 DON'T MATCH. COORDINATE ALL DETAILS TO AVOID MORE
 CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SPECIFY VAPOR BARRIER AND CONCRETE
 SLAB REINFORCEMENT.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 (G)WALL SECTION AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DON'T SPECIFY
 THE ROOF PITCH.
 PROVIDE INFORMATION.
 SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. R905.2
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 ROOF PITCH IS NOT CLEAR. SEE ROOF PLANS AND REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH. ALSO, FOOTING ON THE TYPICAL WALL
 SECTION ON SHEET S-5 DOESN'T MATCH FOUNDATION PLAN.
 NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO OTHER WALL SECTIONS SHOWN ON
 OTHER DRAWINGS SUBMITTED.
  
 (H) OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 (I)WALL SECTION: SPECIFY ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SHOWING
 COMPLIANCE WITH ANY OF THE OPTIONS OF SEC. R905.1.1.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 (J)WALL SECTION TO PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR
 SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION.
 SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. R703.1.2.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REVISED TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET S-5 ONLY
 SPECIFIES "GAL. MTL. LATH" AS THE METAL BASE TO SUPPORT
 THE STUCCO. THIS METAL BASE DOESN'T COMPLY WITH TABLE 3
 OF ASTM C1063 BASED ON THE CEILING TRUSS SPACING. SEE
 TABLE 3 OF ASTM C1063 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 (K) OK.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 (L)REVISE MASONRY BUCK DETAIL. BEVELED BUCKS ARE NOT
 ALLOWED. 2X4 BUCKS DON'T PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO THE
 DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY R609.7.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING.
  
 RESPONSE:
 DETAILS SUBMITTED ARE FOR WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION. NEED
 TO PROVIDE DETAILS FOR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION PROVIDING
 THE INFORMATION REQUESTED ABOVE.
  
 NEW COMMENTS BASED ON NEW PLANS SUBMITTED:
 (M)THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE OF THE NEW ENGINEER OF RECORD
 HAS A SELF CERTIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE. A THIRD PARTY
 CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED. FBPE DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF
 SELF CERTIFIED SIGNATURES. PLEASE OBTAIN A DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE ISSUED BY A CERTIFICATE AUTHORITY (OFTEN
 CALLED 3RD PARTY).
 FAC 61G15-23.004
  
 (N)THE PERMIT APPLICATION AND PREVIOUS PLANS CALLED FOR
 A NEW "BEDROOM" ADDITION. PLANS SUBMITTED NOW CALL FOR
 "STORAGE" ADDITION. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT IS GOING TO BE
 THE USE OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION. SEC. 102.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
 NOTE: THE DESCRIPTION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION AND
 PLANS MUST MATCH TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CLEARLY LABEL
 ON THE FLOOR PLAN THE ROOM NAME.
  
 (O)PLANS ARE MISSING THE ROOF TRUSSES LOAD INFORMATION.
 ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ALL ROOF LIVE AND DEAD
 LOADS. CLEARLY SPECIFY TRUSS TOP AND BOTTOM CHORDS LIVE
 AND DEAD LOADS INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS
 REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: SEE
 FOOTNOTES "B" AND "G".
  
 (P)ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE ALL THE WIND DESIGN
 CRITERIA AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 SPECIFY THE ULTIMATE AND NOMINAL WIND LOAD, BUILDING
 EXPOSURE, BUILDING MEAN ROOF HEIGHT, ETC.
  
 (Q)ROOF SHEATHING SPECS ON SHEET S-5: SPECIFY ROOF
 SHEATHING THICKNESS AND SPECIFY RING SHANK NAILS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL
  
 (R) SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION. SEC. R807.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 5- PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR ATTACHMENT OF
 PROPOSED ADDITION TO EXISTING STRUCTURE AT WALLS AND
 ROOFING AREAS.
 SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. R301.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL.
  
 6- SHEET S1.2 (NOTE: CHANGE OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. NEW
 DRAWINGS S-1 THRU S-6 SUBMITTED):
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR GABLE
 END CONSTRUCTION. IS THERE A RAKED BEAM?. IF SO,
 PROVIDE SPECS. SHOW BEAM IN THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN.
 SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. R301.2.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 RESPONSE:
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL.
  
 7-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC
 61G20-3.001 FOR
  
 ORIGINAL COMMENT:
 A)EXTERIOR DOORS.
  
 RESPONSE:
 NOA 20-1230.07 SUBMITTED IS FOR "INSWING" DOOR. PLANS
 SHOW "OUTSWING" DOOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
 ALSO, NOA SUBMITTED IS EXPIRED.
  
 B)OK.
 C) OK.
  
 D)ROOF SHINGLES.
  
 E)ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF
 THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR
 SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL
 HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
 ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved