Date |
Text |
2022-07-18 15:19:57 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| COMMENTS |
| CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| PERMIT #21050513 |
| |
| 1- OK. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 2- LOT DRAINAGE (SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING) |
| PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| FOLLOWING: |
| R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| NOTE: DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| GRADE ELEVATIONS SHOWING HOW KEEPING WATER AWAY FROM |
| ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| |
| 3- OK. |
| |
| 4- SHEET S1.1 (NOTE: CHANGE OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. NEW |
| DRAWINGS S-1 THRU S-6 SUBMITTED): |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| (A)PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN: PROVIDE LAYOUT OF ROOMS ADJACENT |
| TO THE PROPOSED ADDITION. NEED THIS TO VERIFY IF THERE |
| ARE BEDROOMS ADJACENT TO THE ADDITION AND EXISTING |
| EGRESS REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT CHANGED OR BLOCKED. |
| SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REVISED PLANS SHOW EXISTING BEDROOM ADJACENT TO THE |
| ADDITION. ACCORDING TO PLAN SUBMITTED THERE IS AN |
| EXISTING DOOR LEADING TO THE OUTSIDE. THE PROPOSED |
| ADDITION IS BLOCKING THE BEDROOM EMERGENCY EGRESS. NEED |
| TO SHOW EMERGENCY ESCAPE COMPLIANCE FOR EXISTING |
| BEDROOM. CLEARLY SPECIFY IF THERE IS ANY EXISTING |
| WINDOW COMPLYING WITH SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| SPECIFY WINDOW TYPE AND SIZE (WIDTH X HEIGHT) |
| |
| (B)OK. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| (C)REVISE DESIGN CRITERIA: WIND EXPOSURE DOESN'T MATCH |
| WIND EXPOSURE IN TRUSS NOTE #1 ON SHEET S1.2. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. |
| SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REVISED PLANS ARE MISSING THE WIND EXPOSURE. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| (D)DESIGN CRITERIA SPECIFIES: FULLY OPEN DESIGN AND |
| INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT = N/A. THIS BUILDING IS |
| NOT OPEN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. R301.2.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REVISED PLANS ARE MISSING THIS INFORMATION. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| (E)REVISE BUILDING CATEGORY. THIS BUILDING IS NOT |
| CATEGORY I. IT IS CATEGORY II. SEE SEC. 1604.5 |
| FBC-BUILDING. |
| SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REVISED PLANS ARE MISSING THIS INFORMATION. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| (F) FOUNDATION PLAN DOESN'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| CONCRETE SLAB. PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS. FOOTING |
| SIZE, REINFORCEMENT, VAPOR BARRIER, ETC. |
| SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT CLEAR. THERE ARE SEVERAL |
| DIFFERENT DETAILS SUBMITTED SHOWING NEW CONCRETE SLAB |
| OVER EXISTING. THIS INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH PROPOSED |
| ADDITION. PROVIDE ONLY THE DETAILS THAT APPLY TO THIS |
| JOB. ALSO, TYPE OF FOOTING AND PROPOSED EXTERIOR WALLS |
| DON'T MATCH. COORDINATE ALL DETAILS TO AVOID MORE |
| CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SPECIFY VAPOR BARRIER AND CONCRETE |
| SLAB REINFORCEMENT. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| (G)WALL SECTION AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DON'T SPECIFY |
| THE ROOF PITCH. |
| PROVIDE INFORMATION. |
| SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. R905.2 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| ROOF PITCH IS NOT CLEAR. SEE ROOF PLANS AND REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED TO MATCH. ALSO, FOOTING ON THE TYPICAL WALL |
| SECTION ON SHEET S-5 DOESN'T MATCH FOUNDATION PLAN. |
| NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO OTHER WALL SECTIONS SHOWN ON |
| OTHER DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. |
| |
| (H) OK. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| (I)WALL SECTION: SPECIFY ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SHOWING |
| COMPLIANCE WITH ANY OF THE OPTIONS OF SEC. R905.1.1.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| (J)WALL SECTION TO PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR |
| SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION. |
| SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. R703.1.2.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REVISED TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET S-5 ONLY |
| SPECIFIES "GAL. MTL. LATH" AS THE METAL BASE TO SUPPORT |
| THE STUCCO. THIS METAL BASE DOESN'T COMPLY WITH TABLE 3 |
| OF ASTM C1063 BASED ON THE CEILING TRUSS SPACING. SEE |
| TABLE 3 OF ASTM C1063 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| (K) OK. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| (L)REVISE MASONRY BUCK DETAIL. BEVELED BUCKS ARE NOT |
| ALLOWED. 2X4 BUCKS DON'T PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO THE |
| DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY R609.7.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| DETAILS SUBMITTED ARE FOR WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION. NEED |
| TO PROVIDE DETAILS FOR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION PROVIDING |
| THE INFORMATION REQUESTED ABOVE. |
| |
| NEW COMMENTS BASED ON NEW PLANS SUBMITTED: |
| (M)THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE OF THE NEW ENGINEER OF RECORD |
| HAS A SELF CERTIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE. A THIRD PARTY |
| CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED. FBPE DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF |
| SELF CERTIFIED SIGNATURES. PLEASE OBTAIN A DIGITAL |
| SIGNATURE ISSUED BY A CERTIFICATE AUTHORITY (OFTEN |
| CALLED 3RD PARTY). |
| FAC 61G15-23.004 |
| |
| (N)THE PERMIT APPLICATION AND PREVIOUS PLANS CALLED FOR |
| A NEW "BEDROOM" ADDITION. PLANS SUBMITTED NOW CALL FOR |
| "STORAGE" ADDITION. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT IS GOING TO BE |
| THE USE OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION. SEC. 102.2 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| NOTE: THE DESCRIPTION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION AND |
| PLANS MUST MATCH TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED TO MATCH. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CLEARLY LABEL |
| ON THE FLOOR PLAN THE ROOM NAME. |
| |
| (O)PLANS ARE MISSING THE ROOF TRUSSES LOAD INFORMATION. |
| ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ALL ROOF LIVE AND DEAD |
| LOADS. CLEARLY SPECIFY TRUSS TOP AND BOTTOM CHORDS LIVE |
| AND DEAD LOADS INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS |
| REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: SEE |
| FOOTNOTES "B" AND "G". |
| |
| (P)ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE ALL THE WIND DESIGN |
| CRITERIA AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| SPECIFY THE ULTIMATE AND NOMINAL WIND LOAD, BUILDING |
| EXPOSURE, BUILDING MEAN ROOF HEIGHT, ETC. |
| |
| (Q)ROOF SHEATHING SPECS ON SHEET S-5: SPECIFY ROOF |
| SHEATHING THICKNESS AND SPECIFY RING SHANK NAILS AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| |
| (R) SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION. SEC. R807.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 5- PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR ATTACHMENT OF |
| PROPOSED ADDITION TO EXISTING STRUCTURE AT WALLS AND |
| ROOFING AREAS. |
| SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. R301.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| |
| 6- SHEET S1.2 (NOTE: CHANGE OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. NEW |
| DRAWINGS S-1 THRU S-6 SUBMITTED): |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR GABLE |
| END CONSTRUCTION. IS THERE A RAKED BEAM?. IF SO, |
| PROVIDE SPECS. SHOW BEAM IN THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN. |
| SEC. 606 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. R301.2.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| |
| 7-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| A)EXTERIOR DOORS. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| NOA 20-1230.07 SUBMITTED IS FOR "INSWING" DOOR. PLANS |
| SHOW "OUTSWING" DOOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| ALSO, NOA SUBMITTED IS EXPIRED. |
| |
| B)OK. |
| C) OK. |
| |
| D)ROOF SHINGLES. |
| |
| E)ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |