| Date |
Text |
| 2021-05-14 19:46:51 | FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE, SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | SUBMITTAL #21041684 |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- REVISE INFORMATION ENTERED IN SECTION C2: |
| | (A) THERE IS NO INFORMATION IN THE SURVEY FOR THE |
| | ELEVATION AT THE LOADING AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE |
| | BUILDING. ACCORDING TO PLANS, THE ELEVATION AT THE |
| | ENTRANCE OF THE LOADING AREA IS LOWER THAN THE REST OF |
| | THE FLOOR. THIS LOOKS LIKE THE TOP OF BOTTOM FLOOR. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | PROVIDE FINAL SURVEY SHOWING ELEVATIONS IN THE LOADING |
| | AREA. (INCLUDE THE FIRE PUMP ROOM, TRASH ROOM, DOMESTIC |
| | PUMP ROOM). |
| | SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | (1)REVISED FINAL SURVEY SHOWS 14.24 (NAVD) FINISH FLOOR |
| | ELEVATION AT TRASH ROOM. THIS ELEVATION IS BELOW THE |
| | DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION OF 14.7 (NAVD) SPECIFIED BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET A-2.1 FOR PROPOSED |
| | ELEVATION (16.25 NGVD). COORDINATE WITH THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED FINISH |
| | ELEVATION. |
| | SEC. 1612.4 FBC-BUILDING. SEC. 1.5.2 ASCE 24. |
| | |
| | (2)CLARIFY WHY DOMESTIC PUMP ROOM SAYS F.F.E.=14.71 |
| | SINCE THERE IS AN SPOT ELEVATION OF 14.61 SHOWN AT THE |
| | ENTRY OF THIS ROOM. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | (3)CLARIFY WHY LOADING AREA F.F.E.=14.12 AND THERE IS |
| | AN SPOT ELEVATION OF 14.62 SHOWN AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE |
| | LOADING AREA. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | (B)OK. |
| | (C)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | (D)ACCORDING TO FINAL SURVEY SUBMITTED IT LOOKS LIKE |
| | THE TOP OF ATTACHED GARAGE ELEVATION IS TAKEN AT A |
| | MIDPOINT OF THE GARAGE RAMP. THE LOWEST ELEVATION OF |
| | THE GARAGE IS AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE GARAGE. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | GARAGE ELEVATION WAS CHANGED, BUT THE LOCATION WHERE |
| | THIS ELEVATION IS SHOWN IS MISLEADING. THIS ELEVATION |
| | IS SHOWN AT MID POINT OF THE GARAGE. THIS GARAGE HAS |
| | DIFFERENT LEVELS AND THE POINT WHERE THE REVISED |
| | ELEVATION IS SHOWN IS HIGHER THAN THE NUMBER SHOWN. |
| | TYPICALLY, THE ELEVATIONS ARE MARKED AT THE POINT WHERE |
| | THE ELEVATION IS TAKEN. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT TO THIS ITEM: |
| | (E)BASED ON THE REVISED FINAL SURVEY IT LOOKS LIKE THE |
| | LOWEST ELEVATION OF MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT IS NOT THE |
| | GENERATOR PAD. THE EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN THE ROOMS |
| | ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA SEEM TO BE LOWER THAN THE |
| | GENERATOR PAD. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | (F)OK. |
| | (G)OK. |
| | (H)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- PROVIDE PHOTOS SHOWING THE VENTS SPECIFIED ON ITEM |
| | A9(B). |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH VENTS SHOWN ON SHEET A.2.1 AND |
| | DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. THERE IS A VENT |
| | INSIDE THE GARAGE CONNECTING TO THE OUTSIDE WALL. THE |
| | OTHER VENT CONSIDERED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD IS THE |
| | ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE. SHOW ALL VENTS. SEE ITEM A6 |
| | FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE INSTRUCTIONS. |
| | ALSO, ALL PHOTOS NEED TO BE AT LEAST 3"X3". REVISE |
| | PHOTO THREE ON PAGE 6 OF 6. |
| | |
| | SEE ARCHITECT'S REVISION #8 ON PLANS AND REVISION |
| | #19110684 CITY RECORDS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | (1)ONLY THE INSIDE VENT WAS SHOWN. NEED PHOTO SHOWING |
| | THE OUTSIDE VENT THAT CONNECTS TO THE INSIDE VENT. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | (2)VENT SHOWN ON THE PHOTO DOESN'T SEEM TO MATCH THE |
| | ONE DESIGNED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. SEE SHEET SHEET |
| | A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON SHEET A-8.1.1. DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD NEEDS TO REVISE VENT DESIGN OR CONTRACTOR NEEDS |
| | TO INSTALL VENT THAT MATCHES THE ONE DESIGNED BY THE |
| | ARCHITECT OF RECORD. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3- OK. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | 4- ITEM A9(C) WAS REVISED. THIS ITEM IS FOR THE NET |
| | AREA OF FLOOD OPENINGS. AREA SHOWN IS WAY TOO HIGH |
| | COMPARED TO THE ONE SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF |
| | RECORD ON SHEET SHEET A.2.1 AND DETAILS 4 AND 8 ON |
| | SHEET A-8.1.1. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. ONLY THE AREA BELOW THE DESIGN |
| | FLOOD ELEVATION COUNTS. ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY THE |
| | ACTUAL NET AREA (EXCLUDING VENT FRAME)OF THE INSTALLED |
| | VENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | *********************** |
