| Date |
Text |
| 2021-06-14 10:50:40 | WINDOWS/DOORS SUBMITTAL, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | SUBMITTAL #21041230 |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS CHANGED TO DOUBLE HUNG |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL14477-R5. THIS PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL DOESN'T INCLUDE A WINDOW SIZE SCHEDULE. PLANS |
| | SPECIFY SH25 EGRESS WINDOWS FOR THE SECOND FLOOR |
| | BEDROOMS. |
| | TYPICALLY, A SH25 SINGLE HUNG HAS A SIZE OF +/-37" |
| | WIDTH BY +/-63" HEIGHT. BASED ON THE KOLBE & KOLBE |
| | MILLWORK COMPANY WEBSITE IT LOOKS LIKE THIS SIZE OF |
| | WINDOW MAY NOT COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS FOR |
| | THE SECOND FLOOR BEDROOMS. |
| | PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S CUT SHEETS SHOWING THAT THE |
| | SPECIFIED WINDOW SIZE COMPLIES WITH THE EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS. CLEARLY SHOW SIZE OF WINDOW AND ALL CLEAR |
| | OPENINGS: WIDTH, HEIGHT AND TOTAL CLEAR OPENING. IF |
| | SIZE OF WINDOW NEEDS TO BE REVISED, THEN REVISE PLANS |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. INFORMATION NOT |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- NEED TO SUBMIT ALL THE PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED |
| | FOR THIS HOUSE. ONLY THE ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE |
| | ALREADY APPROVED. NOTE: PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT |
| | APPROVED WHEN THE BUILDING PERMIT WAS ISSUED BECAUSE IT |
| | WAS AGREED WITH MRS. SOFIA SCIALLA THAT IN ORDER TO |
| | EXPEDITE THE BUILDING REVIEW APPROVAL ALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WERE GOING TO BE SUBMITTED LATER. THIS WAS |
| | BECAUSE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SCHEDULE ON SHEET 3 OF 10 |
| | DIDN'T MATCH PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. |
| | SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR: ENTRY DOORS, OVERHEAD |
| | GARAGE DOORS, GARAGE EXTERIOR SIDE SWING DOORS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | 3(A)-ENTRY DOOR: PROVIDE EITHER FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPONDS TO DRAWINGS |
| | SUBMITTED. IF DOOR DOESN'T HAVE A FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL OR MIAMI-DADE NOA, THEN DOOR MANUFACTURER MAY |
| | SUBMIT COMPLETE ENGINEERING PACKAGE FOR REVIEW FOR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | NOTE: PLANS NEED TO HAVE THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND |
| | SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 61G15-23.001 FAC AND CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING |
| | PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. |
| | |
| | 3(B) MISSING PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR GARAGE EXTERIOR SIDE |
| | SWING DOOR. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING MULLION PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | ACCORDING TO PLANS THERE ARE NOT MULLIONS. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. PLANS DON'T SHOW MULLIONS. IF THERE ARE |
| | ANY MULLIONS, THEN REVISE PLANS ACCORDINGLY AND SPECIFY |
| | MULLION SIZE AND FASTENING. REVISION FEES APPLY. |
| | SEC. R301 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 5- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
