Date |
Text |
2021-06-16 14:08:37 | COMMENTS UPDATED 07/07/21 AND EMAILED TO VICTOR |
| VELASQUEZ. |
| THERE IS A CONCERN ABOUT THE DESIGN OF THE BEAM AND |
| COLUMNS SUPPORTING THE WEIGHT OF PROPOSED 8" CONCRETE |
| SLAB (THIS WAS DISCUSSED WITH ROBERT BROWN, BUILDING |
| OFFICIAL): |
| 1- SECOND FLOOR CONCRETE SLAB: |
| A)STRUCTURAL PLANS SHOW AN 8" CONCRETE SLAB TO BE |
| SUPPORTED ON 8X20 CONCRETE BEAM AND 3-1/4 X 3-1/4 X 1/4 |
| TUBE COLUMNS. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT THE |
| STEEL REINFORCEMENT SPECIFIED FOR THE CONCRETE BEAM |
| (2#5 BARS ON TOP AND 2#7 BARS AT BOTTOM)IS ADEQUATE TO |
| TRANSFER THE BENDING MOMENT OF THE CONTINUOUS CONCRETE |
| BEAM AT THE STEEL COLUMNS. ALSO, CHECK THE BUCKLING OF |
| THE TUBE COLUMNS. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. |
| R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| B)FOUNDATION PLAN IS MISSING THE FOOTING FOR COLUMN |
| SUPPORTING THE REAR END OF 8X20 CONCRETE BEAM. SEC. |
| 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| C)CLARIFY WHY COLUMN SUPPORTING THE REAR END OF 8X20 |
| CONCRETE BEAM IS DIFFERENT THAN THE ONE SPECIFIED AT |
| THE FRONT END. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. |
| R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| COMMENTS UPDATED 06/22/21. |
| GOOD AFTERNOON MR. VELASQUEZ, |
| THE ANSWER IS YES. YOU NEED TO PROVIDE AN APPROVED |
| ASSEMBLY THAT MEETS THE FIRE RATING SPECIFIED ON THE |
| TWO STORY WALL SECTION AND BUILDING SECTION A-A. |
| THE ASSEMBLY NEEDS TO BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM |
| E119 OR UL 263 OR ANY OTHER METHOD DESCRIBED IN SEC. |
| 703.3 FBC-BUILDING. |
| |
| NOTE: |
| 1) ALSO, NEED TO PROVIDE A FIRE RATED WALL ASSEMBLY FOR |
| FIRST FLOOR EXTERIOR WALL SUPPORTING THE SECOND FLOOR |
| ASSEMBLY SPECIFIED ON TWO STORY WALL SECTION AND |
| BUILDING SECTION A-A. |
| I APOLOGIZE, I MEANT TO ADD THIS IN MY COMMENTS, BUT |
| SOMEHOW I DIDN'T DO IT. NOW THAT I HAVE A SECOND CHANCE |
| TO READ THE COMMENTS I REALIZED THIS. I WILL UPDATE MY |
| COMMENTS ACCORDINGLY. |
| |
| 2)ALSO, PROVIDE DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| MONOLITHIC BEAM SUPPORTING THE 8" CONCRETE SLAB SHOWN |
| ON THE TWO STORY WALL SECTION AND BUILDING SECTION A-A. |
| I APOLOGIZE, I MEANT TO ADD THIS IN MY COMMENTS, BUT |
| SOMEHOW I DIDN'T DO IT. NOW THAT I HAVE A SECOND CHANCE |
| TO READ THE COMMENTS I REALIZED THIS. I WILL UPDATE MY |
| COMMENTS ACCORDINGLY. |
| |
| THANK YOU |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| NEW DUPLEX (R3) BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| PERMIT #21041108 |
| |
| 1- INTERIOR STEEL COLUMNS SUPPORTING THE SECOND FLOOR |
| CONCRETE SLAB NEED TO BE FIRE RATED AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| R302.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED ASSEMBLIES SHOWING FIRE |
| RESISTANCE COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| 2- SECOND FLOOR ASSEMBLY: PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED ASSEMBLIES SHOWING FIRE |
| RESISTANCE COMPLIANCE THRU FLOOR ASSEMBLY PENETRATIONS |
| AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 302.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| 3- LOT DRAINAGE: |
| PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| FOLLOWING: |
| R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 4- ENERGY CALCULATIONS (FIRST FLOOR): |
| A)THE ENERGY FORM R405-2020 IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED |
| AND DATED BY THE OWNER, ARCHITECT OR OWNER?S LEGALLY |
| DESIGNATED AGENT AT THE BOTTOM OF FORM SUBMITTED AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, |
| PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE PERMIT TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION. |
| |
| B)DESIGN LOCATION SPECIFIED ON TOP OF FORM 405-2020 AND |
| UNDER CLIMATE HEADING ON PAGE 2 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. THIS |
| HOUSE IS NOT IN FORT PIERCE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| C)PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF |
| FORM. NEED CORRECT LOCATION AND BUILDER'S NAME. SEC. |
| R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| D)ITEM #2 IS NOT CLEAR. ITEM #2 IS ASKING IF "SINGLE |
| FAMILY OR MULTIPLE FAMILY". WHAT IS "DETACHED". REVISE |
| AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE CORRECT ANSWER. |
| NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #3. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| E)ITEM #5 SPECIFIES WORST CASE SCENARIO. ENERGY |
| CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SITE SPECIFIC AS REQUIRED BY |
| SEC. R405.4.2.1 (4) FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| F)CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA SPECIFIED ON ITEM #6 DOESN'T |
| MATCH AREA SPECIFIED ON ARCHITECT'S PLANS. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| G)CEILING INFORMATION ON ITEM #11 IS INCORRECT. REVISE |
| THE AREA. THE CEILING OF THE FIRST FLOOR IS THE SECOND |
| FLOOR ASSEMBLY AND IT IS NOT VENTED. ALSO, |
| ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DON'T SPECIFY INSULATION. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED TO MATCH PLANS. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| H)ROOF INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. REVISE |
| AS REQUIRED. |
| NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM 4(G) ABOVE. AND, COORDINATE |
| WITH ARCHITECT'S PLANS FOR SECOND FLOOR ENERGY |
| CALCULATIONS. SEE CORRECT ROOF TYPE AND ROOFING |
| MATERIAL. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| I)ATTIC INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. THERE |
| IS NOT ATTIC ON THE FIRST FLOOR. |
| NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM 4(G) ABOVE. AND, COORDINATE |
| WITH ARCHITECT'S PLANS. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| J)CEILING INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. THE |
| CEILING ON FIRST FLOOR IS CONCRETE NOT WOOD. SEE PLANS. |
| NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM 4(G) ABOVE. AND, COORDINATE |
| WITH ARCHITECT'S PLANS. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| K)DOORS INFORMATION ON PAGE 4 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. |
| ACCORDING TO ARCHITECT'S EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, ENTRY |
| DOORS HAVE A LARGE GLASS PANEL. SEE PLANS. THIS DOOR |
| SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE WINDOW/GLAZING AREA AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.5.3 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| L) WINDOWS INFORMATION ON PAGE 4 OF 6 DOESN'T MATCH |
| PLANS. REVISE WINDOW ORIENTATION, WINDOW AREA AND |
| WINDOW OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION TO MATCH |
| ARCHITECT'S PLANS AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| M)BUILDER TO COMPLETE AND SIGN THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE |
| LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| |
| 5- ENERGY CALCULATIONS (SECOND FLOOR): |
| A)THE ENERGY FORM R405-2020 IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED |
| AND DATED BY THE OWNER, ARCHITECT OR OWNER?S LEGALLY |
| DESIGNATED AGENT AT THE BOTTOM OF FORM SUBMITTED AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, |
| PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE PERMIT TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION. |
| |
| B)DESIGN LOCATION SPECIFIED ON TOP OF FORM 405-2020 AND |
| UNDER CLIMATE HEADING ON PAGE 2 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. THIS |
| HOUSE IS NOT IN FORT PIERCE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| C)PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF |
| FORM. NEED CORRECT LOCATION AND BUILDER'S NAME. SEC. |
| R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| D)ITEM #2 IS NOT CLEAR. ITEM #2 IS ASKING IF "SINGLE |
| FAMILY OR MULTIPLE FAMILY". WHAT IS "DETACHED". REVISE |
| AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE CORRECT ANSWER. |
| NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #3. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| E)ITEM #5 SPECIFIES WORST CASE SCENARIO. ENERGY |
| CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SITE SPECIFIC AS REQUIRED BY |
| SEC. R405.4.2.1 (4) FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| F)CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA SPECIFIED ON ITEM #6 DOESN'T |
| MATCH AREA SPECIFIED ON ARCHITECT'S PLANS. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| G)CEILING INFORMATION ON ITEM #11 IS INCORRECT. REVISE |
| THE CEILING AREA. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| H)ROOF INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. TYPE OF |
| ROOF IS NOT GABLE. THE ROOFING MATERIAL IS NOT BARREL |
| TILE. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| I)ATTIC INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. |
| TYPICALLY VENT RATIO IS 1/150. SEE SEC. R806.2 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| (PLANS DON'T SHOW VENTILATION RATIO OF 1/300 AS ALLOWED |
| BY THE EXCEPTION OF SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL). |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| J)DOORS INFORMATION ON PAGE 4 OF 6 IS INCORRECT. |
| ACCORDING TO ARCHITECT'S EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, ENTRY |
| DOORS HAVE A LARGE GLASS PANEL. SEE PLANS. THIS DOOR |
| SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE WINDOW/GLAZING AREA AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.5.3 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| K) WINDOWS INFORMATION ON PAGE 4 OF 6 DOESN'T MATCH |
| PLANS. REVISE WINDOW ORIENTATION, WINDOW AREA AND |
| WINDOW OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION TO MATCH |
| ARCHITECT'S PLANS AND EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| L)BUILDER TO COMPLETE AND SIGN THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE |
| LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| |
| 6- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS SHOWING COMPLIANCE TABLE |
| R301.5, SEC. R311.7.8 AND SEC. R312.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO |
| INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| |
| A)ENTRY DOOR. |
| B)SLIDING GLASS DOORS. |
| C)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS |
| D)ROOF SHINGLES. |
| E)ROOF RIDGE VENT. SEE ROOF RIDGE DETAIL ON SHEET A-5. |
| F)SHUTTERS WITH COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE IF DOORS |
| AND WINDOWS DON'T HAVE IMPACT GLAZING. |
| |
| 8- PROVIDE DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR SECOND FLOOR |
| FINISH FLOOR. NEED FLOOR SOUND INSULATION BETWEEN |
| DWELLING UNITS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 105.2 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| THE FOLLOWING FLOOR SOUND INFORMATION MAY BE SUBMITTED |
| LATER AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL WHEN REVIEWED BY THE |
| ARCHITECT OF RECORD: |
| FLOORING SOUND INSULATION MATERIAL: |
| A) PROVIDE COPY OF THE FLAME SPREAD INDEX AND SMOKE |
| DEVELOPED INDEX TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 |
| OR UL 723 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 720.1 OF FBC 7TH EDITION |
| (2020). |
| B) PROVIDE COPY OF THE SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS (STC) |
| TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90 AS REQUIRED BY |
| SEC. 1207.2 OF FBC 7TH EDITION (2020). |
| C) PROVIDE COPY OF THE IMPACT INSULATION CLASS (IIC) |
| TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 492 AS REQUIRED BY |
| SEC. 1207.3 OF FBC 7TH EDITION (2020). |
| |
| 9- WINDOWS AND DOORS DETAILS ON SHEET A-4 ARE MISSING |
| THE STRUCTURAL BUCK FASTENING SPECIFICATIONS. DESIGNER |
| OF RECORD NEEDS TO SPECIFY FASTENER TYPE, SIZE AND |
| SPACING. |
| SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| 10- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS |
| LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN |
| PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $359,252. THE |
| PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $1825.90. |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |
| |