Date |
Text |
2021-08-24 17:55:42 | RESIDENTIAL (R3)ADDITION, THIRD REVIEW COMMENTS |
| CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| PERMIT #21040699 |
| |
| ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| REVIEW |
| |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 1-SHEET S2.01: |
| LIVE AND DEAD LOADS SPECIFIED UNDER THE DESIGN CRITERIA |
| AND STRUCTURAL NOTES ARE NOT CLEAR. CLEARLY SPECIFY THE |
| TOP CHORD LIVE LOADS, TOP CHORD DEAD LEADS AND BOTTOM |
| CHORD LIVE LOADS, DEAD LOADS. SEC. R301.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND TABLE R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| ARCHITECT SPECIFIED TRUSS TOP CHORD-DEAD LOAD=0 PSF. |
| THIS IS INCORRECT. THERE IS ALWAYS A DEAD LOAD TO BE |
| CONSIDERED. REVISE AS REQUIRED AND TAKE INTO |
| CONSIDERATION THERE IS ROOF TILE ON THIS PROJECT. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 2-REVISE ROOF ZONE UPLIFT DIAGRAM TO REFLECT ALL ROOF |
| ZONES CHANGES DONE FOR 2020 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEE FIGURE |
| R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| NOTE: CLARIFY IF THE SPECIFIED DESIGN PRESSURES ARE |
| ULTIMATE DESIGN PRESSURES OR NOMINAL. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT FOR ZONES |
| 2E AND 2R ARE LOWER THAN THOSE FOR ZONE 3 FOR HIP |
| ROOFS. ACCORDING TO FIGURE R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| AND TABLE R301.2(2)FBC-RESIDENTIAL ZONES 2E, 2R AND 3 |
| HAVE THE SAME DESIGN PRESSURES. REVISE THE DESIGN |
| PRESSURES SHOWN UNDER THE ROOF DIAGRAM. |
| NOTE: SIMILAR COMMENT APPLIES TO DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN |
| ON GABLE ROOF. |
| |
| 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO |
| INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS): |
| |
| A)ROOF TILE ADHESIVE SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF |
| RECORD. |
| |
| B)OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR SIZE SPECIFIED ON DOOR SCHEDULE. |
| (18' X 9'). AND, NEED DOOR THAT MEETS THE DESIGN |
| PRESSURES SHOWN ON REVISED SHEET S1.01. |
| |
| C)SWING GARAGE DOOR SIZE SPECIFIED ON DOOR SCHEDULE |
| (3'X 9'). AND, NEED DOOR THAT MEETS THE DESIGN |
| PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD. |
| |
| 4-DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. NOTE: NEED |
| TO REVISE PRODUCT APPROVALS LETTER. |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |