| Date |
Text |
| 2021-07-23 18:37:43 | |
| | RESIDENTIAL (R3)ADDITION, SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21040699 |
| | |
| | 1- OK |
| | |
| | 2- SHEET S-2.01: |
| | A) OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) REVISE ALL THE DESIGN PRESSURES (DOORS/WINDOWS, |
| | ROOF) TO REFLECT THE REVISED BUILDING EXPOSURE REQUIRED |
| | BY ITEM #2(A) ABOVE. SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: CLARIFY IF THE SPECIFIED DESIGN PRESSURES ARE |
| | ULTIMATE DESIGN PRESSURES OR NOMINAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | (1)ARCHITECT SPECIFIED THAT ROOF PRESSURES SHOWN ON THE |
| | ROOF ZONE UPLIFT DIAGRAM ARE ULTIMATE DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | THIS PRESSURES ARE TOO LOW IF THEY ARE THE ULTIMATE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | (2)ARCHITECT SPECIFIED THAT DOORS AND WINDOWS DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES SHOWN ON SHEET S-1.01 ARE ULTIMATE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES. THIS PRESSURES ARE TOO LOW IF THEY ARE THE |
| | ULTIMATE DESIGN PRESSURES. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE NEW |
| | FRENCH DOORS ON THE MAIN HOUSE. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)REVISE ROOF ZONE UPLIFT DIAGRAM TO REFLECT ALL ROOF |
| | ZONES CHANGES DONE FOR 2020 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEE FIGURE |
| | R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: CLARIFY IF THE SPECIFIED DESIGN PRESSURES ARE |
| | ULTIMATE DESIGN PRESSURES OR NOMINAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DIAGRAM SUBMITTED WAS NOT REVISED. SEE NEW ROOF ZONES |
| | CHANGES DONE FOR 2020 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEE NEW FIGURE |
| | R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND NEW TABLE R301.2(2) |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | NEED TO REVISE THE ROOF DESIGN PRESSURES ACCORDINGLY |
| | SHOWING EACH NEW ROOF ZONE. ALSO, ULTIMATE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES SHOWN ARE TOO LOW FOR EXPOSURE "D". |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | D) OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | E)LIVE AND DEAD LOADS SPECIFIED UNDER THE DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA AND STRUCTURAL NOTES ARE NOT CLEAR. CLEARLY |
| | SPECIFY THE TOP CHORD LIVE LOADS, TOP CHORD DEAD LEADS |
| | AND BOTTOM CHORD LIVE LOADS, DEAD LOADS. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND TABLE R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | TRUSS TOP AND BOTTOM DEAD LOADS ARE STILL NO SPECIFIED. |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS TO SPECIFY ALL THE DESIGN |
| | LOADS, INCLUDING THE DEAD LOADS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3- OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- BREEZEWAY UNDERLAYMENT IS NOT CLEAR. SPECIFICATIONS |
| | ON SHEET A-3.01 AND SPECIFICATIONS ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN |
| | DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOW IS NOT CLEAR IF THE BREEZEWAY IS GOING TO HAVE |
| | METAL ROOF OR CLAY TILE. NEW NOTE ON THE ROOF FRAMING |
| | PLAN SPECIFIES CLAY BARREL TILE BUT EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS |
| | AND BUILDING SECTIONS SHOW METAL ROOF. REVISE/CLARIFY |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- PROVIDE STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | FOR GARAGE OVERHEAD DOOR, EXTERIOR SWING DOORS AND |
| | WINDOWS. |
| | SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | (1)STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAILS ON SHEETS A5.01 AND A5.02 |
| | SPECIFY STRUCTURAL BUCK SIZE BUT DON'T SPECIFY "TAPCON" |
| | SIZE AND SPACING. THERE IS A NOTE STATING "REFER TO |
| | STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SIZING, SPACING AND EMBEDMENT |
| | SPECIFICATIONS" BUT THERE ARE NO SUCH SPECIFICATIONS ON |
| | THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS TO |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE FASTENING SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | |
| | (2)STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAILS ON SHEETS A5.03 SPECIFY |
| | STRUCTURAL BUCK SIZE BUT DON'T SPECIFY ANCHOR TYPE, |
| | SIZE AND SPACING. THERE IS A NOTE STATING "PER MANUF. |
| | SPECS. AND N.O.A". |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE FASTENING |
| | SPECIFICATIONS OF THE STRUCTURAL BUCK. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: DETAILS ON SHEET A5-03 ARE TITLED "SWING" DOOR. |
| | THIS IS INCORRECT. THIS GARAGE DOOR IS NOT AN SWING |
| | DOOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6- OK |
| | |
| | 7- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A)OK |
| | B)OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)THERE IS NO INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4 FOR THE |
| | OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. STILL NO INFORMATION FOR THE OVERHEAD |
| | GARAGE DOOR. ALSO, DOOR INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF |
| | 4 IS INCORRECT. THE 3'X9' DOOR IS IS NOT WOOD AND IS A |
| | GLAZED DOOR. SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. THIS DOOR |
| | INFORMATION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE GLASS AREA AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.5.3.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D)REVISE WINDOW INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4: |
| | (1)MISSING INFORMATION FOR FRENCH DOOR GLAZING ON THE |
| | EAST SIDE. SEC. R405.5.3.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. COORDINATE WITH RESPONSE TO ITEM 7(C) |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | (2)WINDOW OVERHANG SEPARATION DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. SEE |
| | EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | E)ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM SUBMITTED IS NOT SIGNED BY |
| | THE OWNER OR LEGAL AGENT. THE ENERGY FORM R405-2020 IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND DATED BY THE OWNER, ARCHITECT |
| | OR OWNER'S LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT AT THE BOTTOM OF |
| | FORM SUBMITTED AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE PERMIT |
| | TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | F)THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY CARD |
| | SUBMITTED NOW IS NOT SIGNED BY THE BUILDER. BUILDER TO |
| | SIGN AND COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL (EPL) |
| | DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 8- OK |
| | |
| | 9-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS): |
| | |
| | A)ROOF TILE ADHESIVE SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF |
| | RECORD ON SHEET S-1.01. SEE ROOF TILE NOA SUBMITTED FOR |
| | LISTED ADHESIVES. AND CLEARLY MARK PADDY SIZE. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS BASED ON DOOR SCHEDULE SUBMITTED NOW: |
| | C)OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR SIZE SPECIFIED ON DOOR SCHEDULE. |
| | (18' X 9'). AND, NEED DOOR THAT MEETS THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES SHOWN ON REVISED SHEET S1.01. |
| | |
| | D)SWING GARAGE DOOR SIZE SPECIFIED ON DOOR SCHEDULE |
| | (3'X 9'). AND, NEED DOOR THAT MEETS THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES SHOWN ON REVISED SHEET S1.01. |
| | |
| | 10-DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. NOTE: NEED |
| | TO REVISE PRODUCT APPROVALS LETTER. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
