Date |
Text |
2021-02-23 17:03:27 | RESPONSE TO EMAIL DATED 02/23/21. |
| |
| GOOD AFTERNOON, |
| PLEASE NOTE THAT SIZE CHART SHOWN IS FOR SERIES SH4000 |
| & SH600 SINGLE HUNG PGT WINDOWS. PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| SUBMITTED IS FOR SERIES SH7700A SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. |
| PLEASE COORDINATE ACCORDINGLY. |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE ALL MANUFACTURE?S CUT |
| SHEETS SHOWING ALL THE CLEAR OPENINGS OF THE SPECIFIED |
| WINDOW SIZE AND MODEL. |
| |
| THANK YOU |
| |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| FROM: RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ |
| SENT: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2021 10:02 AM |
| TO: CLAIRE GALLAGHER ; JULIO |
| C. GOMEZ ; STEVEN KENNEDY |
| |
| CC: L GALLAGHER ; |
| [email protected] |
| SUBJECT: PERMIT # 20221151-COMMENT #1 |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE PGT WINDOW 24 EH IS AN EGRESS WINDOW |
| ACCORDING TO PGT INDUSTRIES-37 WIDE X 59.5 HIGH. I WAS |
| CALLING THE WINDOW 24 SH, BUT IT IS ACTUALLY 24 EH.. |
| MEETS 5.7 EGRESS OPENING. PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE |
| ANY QUESTIONS |
| |
| R A F A E L R O D R I G U E Z |
| 5 6 1 . 3 1 2 . 5 9 2 1 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) BUILDING REVIEW |
| COMMENTS |
| CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| PERMIT #20121151 |
| |
| 1- BASED ON THE WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET A7.01 IT LOOKS |
| LIKE THE SIZE OF SINGLE HUNG WINDOW SPECIFIED (3'-1" X |
| 5'-0") SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT DOESN'T COMPLY WITH |
| THE MINIMUM CLEAR OPENING REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310.2.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. TYPICALLY A 60" HEIGHT IMPACT SINGLE |
| HUNG WINDOW DOESN'T PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 24" CLEAR |
| HEIGHT OPENING. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S CUT SHEETS |
| SHOWING THAT THE SPECIFIED 37"X60" SINGLE HUNG WINDOW |
| MEETS ALL THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING THE CLEAR |
| OPENING HEIGHT AND TOTAL CLEAR OPENING OF 5.7 S.F. |
| SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 2- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R401.4 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN |
| QUESTIONABLE SOILS. |
| |
| 3-PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| FOLLOWING: |
| R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 4-ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| A)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| INCLUDING OWNER'S NAME AND BUILDER'S NAME. SEC. |
| R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| B)CEILING TYPE ITEM #10(A) ON PAGE 1 OF 4 IS INCORRECT. |
| ACCORDING TO PLANS THE ATTIC IS NOT VENTED. SEE PLANS |
| AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| |
| C)PROJECT INFORMATION ON PAGE 2 OF 4 SPECIFIES 1 STORY |
| BUILDING. THIS IS INCORRECT. THIS IS A TWO STORY |
| BUILDING. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. |
| R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| D)ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 4 IS INCORRECT. |
| PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED ARE FOR ASPHALT |
| SHINGLES NOT WOOD SHINGLES. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| E)ATTIC INFORMATION SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 4 IS |
| INCORRECT. PLANS DON'T SPECIFY ATTIC VENTILATION. ATTIC |
| IS DESIGNED AS UNVENTED. SEE PLANS AND REVISE ALL THE |
| ATTIC VENTILATION AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| F)BUILDER TO SIGN THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL (EPL) |
| DISPLAY CARD SUBMITTED. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| |
| 5- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO |
| INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| |
| A)WOOD ENTRY DOOR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND DOOR |
| SCHEDULE. |
| |
| B)HARDIE BOARD SIDING AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| |
| 6-DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 7- PLANS SHOW A REAR PATIO WITH A ROOF PITCH OF 3:12. |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY DOUBLE UNDERLAYMENT AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. R905.2.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| NOTE: SAME COMMENT APPLIES TO MAIN ROOF OVERHANG. IT |
| ALSO SHOWS A 3:12 PITCH. |
| |
| 8- PROVISO: |
| A)HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PROVIDE |
| SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEWED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF |
| RECORD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| TABLE R301.5, SEC. R311.7.8 AND SEC. R312.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| B)PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| PROPOSED FACTORY BUILT FIREPLACE SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| WITH SEC. R1004 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND FACTORY BUILT |
| CHIMNEY SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R1005 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING PRIOR |
| TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| |
| C) ICYNENE FOAM INSULATION ESR-1826 REPORT SUBMITTED |
| STATES ON THE COVER PAGE THAT THIS REPORT IS SUBJECT TO |
| RENEWAL ON 02/2018. PROVIDE CURRENT REPORT. SEC. |
| 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN |
| WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |