| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-03 14:09:16 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE(R3)SIXTH BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #20121077 |
| | 839 4TH ST |
| | |
| | ****NOTE: |
| | ACCORDING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL |
| | REGULATION, THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE IS SUSPENDED. |
| | CONTRACTOR TO UPDATE LICENSE STATUS WITH DBPR PRIOR TO |
| | OBTAINING THE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PAY $4728.72 FEE OF FOUR TIMES |
| | THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE |
| | ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW (LAST REVIEW AND THIS ONE). |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| | NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| | SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| | STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| | VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| | SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| | CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| | TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| | OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| | REVIEW |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3-SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | 3-ATTIC ACCESS WAS RELOCATED, BUT BASED ON THE ROOF |
| | FRAMING PLAN, THE LOCATION OF THE ATTIC ACCESS DOESN'T |
| | SEEM TO PROVIDE THE HEADROOM CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ATTIC ACCESS IS LOCATED BETWEEN |
| | TWO GABLE END ROOFS. ALSO, BASED ON SECTION 2 ON SHEET |
| | S-3, THERE IS A MASONRY WALL BETWEEN THE FRONT PART OF |
| | THE HOUSE AND THE REAR PART OF THE HOUSE. THEREFORE, |
| | THERE IS NOT ACCESS TO OTHER ROOF AREAS. EACH ROOF AREA |
| | NEEDS AN ATTIC ACCESS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | 3- ATTIC ACCESS WAS NOT REVISED ON THE ROOF FRAMING |
| | PLAN TO MATCH LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET A-1. |
| | SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A)ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S2 SHOWS ATTIC ACCESS BY |
| | THE KITCHEN AREA BEING BLOCKED BY THE TRUSS GIRDER |
| | ABOVE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B)BEDROOM #3 ATTIC ACCESS LOCATION SHOWN ON SHEET A1 |
| | DOESN'T MATCH LOCATION AND ORIENTATION SHOWN ON THE |
| | ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S2. REVISE TO MATCH. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 6-SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 SHOWS A MASONRY WALL BETWEEN |
| | THE FRONT PART OF THE HOUSE AND THE REAR PART OF THE |
| | HOUSE. ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S-2 DOESN'T SPECIFY |
| | THE BEAM SUPPORTING THE MASONRY WALL. |
| | ROOF FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T SHOW HOW THE TWO REAR GABLE |
| | END ROOFS ARE SUPPORTED AT THE INTERSECTION OF BOTH |
| | ROOFS. |
| | FRONT PORCH WOOD BEAM SIZE AND ROOF RAFTERS SIZE |
| | SPECIFIED ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND WOOD BEAM |
| | SPECIFIED ON SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 DON'T MATCH. |
| | SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 SHOWS OUT LOOKERS IN THE MIDDLE |
| | MASONRY WALL. THE OUT LOOKERS ARE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF |
| | THE SECTION BY THE GABLE END AREA. REVISE/CLARIFY WALL |
| | SECTION AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | D)NEW C1 COLUMN IS NOT SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET |
| | A-1. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A1 SHOWS NEW COLUMN C1 |
| | BLOCKING THE HALLWAY LEADING TO BEDROOM #2 AND BEDROOM |
| | #3. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | E)BEAM SUPPORTING THE TWO GABLE END TRUSSES IS NOT |
| | SPECIFIED ON THE |
| | BEAM SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. ROOF FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T SPECIFY THIS |
| | BEAM. SEE SECTION-1 ON SHEET S3. THE BEAM IN QUESTION |
| | IS THE CENTER BEAM SUPPORTING THE TWO GABLE END |
| | TRUSSES. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 11- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | A)OK. ROOF SHINGLES FL31588-R2. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | D)HARDIE BOARD SIDING. |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX |
| | DOESN'T MATCH FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER NAMED IN |
| | PROJECTDOX SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. ONE OF THEM IS |
| | FL13223-R7 AND THE OTHER ONE IS FL13192.2. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | NOTE: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLEASE UPLOAD THE FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND INSTALLATION |
| | INSTRUCTION ON THE SAME FILE. DON'T SPLIT THEM INTO TWO |
| | SEPARATE FILES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | 12- ENGINEER'S SELF CERTIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE |
| | 1- REVISED DRAWINGS A1, S1, S2, S3 AND S5 HAVE |
| | ENGINEER'S SELF-CERTIFIED SIGNATURE. BOARD OF |
| | ENGINEER'S DON'T ALLOW SELF-CERTIFICATION. A THIRD |
| | PARTY CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED. |
| | FAC 61G15-23.004. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
