Date |
Text |
2020-11-18 15:46:52 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| |
| |
| 1) SHEET A 05 - THE BATHROOM RR - 2 DOOR SWINGS OUT |
| INTO THE PATH OF EGRESS AND ENCROACHES ON THE REQUIRED |
| EGRESS WITH LEADING TO THE SAMPLE ROOM. |
| |
| THERE IS AN EXIT SIGN OVER THAT DOOR LEADING INTO THE |
| SAMPLE ROOM. |
| |
| PER NFPA 101, CH 7 |
| |
| 7.2.1.4.3 DOOR LEAF ENCROACHMENT |
| 7.2.1.4.3.1 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS |
| OF EGRESS SHALL LEAVE NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF THE |
| REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY, |
| OR A LANDING UNOBSTRUCTED AND SHALL NOT PROJECT NOT |
| MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A |
| CORRIDOR, A PASSAGE WAY, OR A LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN, |
| UNLESS BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET: |
| (1) THE DOOR OPENING PROVIDES ACCESS TO A STAIR IN AN |
| EXISTING BUILDING. |
| (2) THE DOOR OPENING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS THAT LIMITS |
| PROJECTION TO NOT MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED |
| WIDTH OF THE STAIR LANDING WHEN THE DOOR |
| LEAF IS FULLY OPEN. |
| |
| THE BATHROOM DOOR WIS REQUIRED TO SWING INTO THE |
| BATHROOM OF THE EXIT SIGN CAN BE MOVED TO OVER THE |
| BREAKROOM DOOR AS LONG AS THE HARDWARE MEETS THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 101, CH 7 MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. |
| |
| |
| 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| 3) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| PETER LEDUC |
| FIRE MARSHAL |
| 561-804-4709 |
| [email protected] |
| |