| Date |
Text |
| 2021-01-21 17:23:32 | FAILED |
| | |
| | WAYFINDING SIGN - GARDENIA PARKING GARAGE |
| | |
| | 1) REVISED COMMENT: PROVIDE A SURVEY SHOWING THE GARAGE |
| | AND ITS SETBACK FROM THE PROPERTY LINE SO THAT STAFF |
| | CAN VERIFY THAT THE SIGN WILL NOT EXTEND PAST THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE. ***** A SURVEY WAS NOT PROVIDED WITH THE |
| | RESUBMITTAL, SO STAFF LOCATED A SURVEY THAT WAS |
| | PROVIDED BY CITYPLACE RETAIL ON A DIFFERENT APPLICATION |
| | (STAFF HAS HAD THE SURVEY SHEET ADDED TO THE PERMIT |
| | PACKAGE). THIS SURVEY SHOWS THAT THERE IS A SIGN |
| | EASEMENT WHICH ESTABLISHES THE PARAMETERS FOR THE SIGN |
| | SIZE AND LOCATION. NOTE: THE PROPOSED SIGN SIZE FITS |
| | WITHIN THE SIGN EASEMENT PARAMETERS. |
| | |
| | 2) THE SIGN EASEMENT REQUIRES THAT THE SIGN IS A |
| | MINIMUM OF 12.5 FEET ABOVE GRADE. THE SOUTH ELEVATION |
| | DRAWING (SIGN ELEVATION) DOES NOT CLEARLY SHOW WHAT THE |
| | HEIGHT OF THE SIGN IS FROM GRADE. THIS INFORMATION |
| | NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 3) CITYPLACE CDD APPROVAL IS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH THE SIGN EASEMENT REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE EVIDENCE |
| | OF THE CDD APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED SIGN IS A WAYFINDING |
| | SIGN. THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA DO NOT |
| | SHOW THE PROPOSED SIGN DESIGN AS AN APPROVED SIGN TYPE. |
| | THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA INCLUDE A |
| | WAIVER II PROVISION THAT PERMITS, "ALTERNATIVE |
| | PLACEMENT, DESIGN OR QUANTITY OF WAYFINDING SIGNS |
| | (DIRECTIONAL OR INFORMATIONAL) FROM THAT WHICH IS |
| | DEPICTED ON THE WAYFINDING SIGN LOCATION MAP UNDER |
| | ROSEMARY SQUARE WAYFINDING SIGN CRITERIA (EXHIBIT D)". |
| | THE WAIVER II IS A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT |
| | THAT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING |
| | DIVISION PRIOR TO THE ZONING SIGN OFF FOR A SIGN AT |
| | THIS LOCATION. THE WAIVER II WILL NEED TO JUSTIFY THE |
| | SIZE AND DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED SIGN, INCLUDING THE |
| | COLORS OF THE VARIOUS SIGN ELEMENTS (IF MORE THAN THREE |
| | COLORS). ***** THE COMMENT RESPONSE THAT THE PROPOSED |
| | SIGN REPLACES AN EXISTING SIGN DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT |
| | THAT THE PROPOSED DESIGN IS NOT COVERED IN THE ROSEMARY |
| | SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA AND THUS MUST BE APPROVED |
| | AS A WAIVER II. |
| | |
| | 5) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN |
| | CRITERIA REQUIRE THAT RIVETS, SCREWS AND OTHER |
| | FASTENERS THAT EXTEND TO VISIBLE SURFACES SHALL BE |
| | FLUSH, FILLED AND FINISHED SO AS TO BE UNNOTICEABLE. |
| | THE BOLTS/ANCHORS CONNECTING THE STEEL SUPPORT ANGLE TO |
| | THE SIGN AND TO THE WALL PAST THE STEEL SUPPORT AND DO |
| | NOT MEET THIS STANDARD. IF THE FASTENER HEADS MUST |
| | EXTEND PAST THE STEEL SUPPORT, THEY NEED TO BE |
| | CONCEALED BY CAPS MATCHING THE COLOR OF THE STEEL |
| | SUPPORT, WHICH MUST BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE WALL. ***** |
| | SEE SHEET 2E B SECTION ? WALL CONNECTION @ BOTTOM, THE |
| | STEEL STUD WEDGE ANCHOR AND BOLT ARE ON THE EXTERIOR OF |
| | THE BRACKET AND VISIBLE. ADDITIONALLY, ON SIGN DETAIL 1 |
| | - SHEET 2C 8-32 X 3/8? SS PH MS MC 91772A192 EXTENDS |
| | PAST THE SURFACE OF THE SIGN. NOTE: THIS ONE COULD BE |
| | COVERED BY THE SIGN DESIGN WAIVER II. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
