Date |
Text |
2020-11-03 15:01:46 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW |
| ________________________________________ |
| |
| DATE OF REVIEW: 11.03.2020 |
| PERMIT NO.: 20090998 |
| ________________________________________ |
| |
| REVIEW STATUS: FAILED |
| ________________________________________ |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN |
| REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| |
| 1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE |
| REMOVED FROM THE MAIN BUILDING PERMIT AND SUBMITTED AS |
| A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT. |
| |
| 1.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - PLEASE PROVIDE THE PERMIT # FOR |
| THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT...I WAS UNABLE TO FIND WHERE SUCH |
| PERMIT HAD BEEN APPLIED FOR. |
| |
| 2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1) IS |
| LACKING A LOT OF DETAIL. |
| |
| 2.1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - WHAT ARE THE DASHED |
| LINES WITH WHAT APPEARS TO BE FOUR (4) POSTS IN THE NEW |
| COURTYARD? IS THIS A TRELLIS (AS INDICATED ON THE |
| HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN)? DETAILS NEED TO BE |
| PROVIDED. |
| |
| 2.1.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE ARE TWO (2) VERSIONS OF |
| THE SITE PLAN IN THE SYSTEM. IT APPEARS THAT VERSIONING |
| OF THE PLANS WAS NOT DONE PROPERLY WHEN UPLOADING THE |
| PLANS. PLEASE REMOVE THE OLD SITE PLAN. THE NEW SITE |
| PLAN HAS SATISFIED THE COMMENT. |
| |
| 2.2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - FENCING NEEDS TO BE |
| LABELED. |
| |
| 2.2.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE ARE |
| TWO (2) VERSIONS OF THE SITE PLAN IN THE SYSTEM. IT |
| APPEARS THAT VERSIONING OF THE PLANS WAS NOT DONE |
| PROPERLY WHEN UPLOADING THE PLANS. PLEASE REMOVE THE |
| OLD SITE PLAN. THE NEW SITE PLAN HAS SATISFIED THE |
| COMMENT. |
| |
| 2.3. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - DETAILS NEED TO BE |
| PROVIDED FOR THE PROPOSED FENCING. |
| |
| 2.3.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE ARE TWO (2) VERSIONS OF |
| THE SITE PLAN IN THE SYSTEM. IT APPEARS THAT VERSIONING |
| OF THE PLANS WAS NOT DONE PROPERLY WHEN UPLOADING THE |
| PLANS. PLEASE REMOVE THE OLD SITE PLAN. THE NEW SITE |
| PLAN HAS SATISFIED THE COMMENT. |
| |
| 2.4. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - VISIBILITY TRIANGLE |
| NEEDS TO BE SHOWN AND ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO |
| IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE THAT ARE |
| BETWEEN 18? AND 8? IN HEIGHT. |
| |
| 2.4.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE ARE TWO (2) VERSIONS OF |
| THE SITE PLAN IN THE SYSTEM. IT APPEARS THAT VERSIONING |
| OF THE PLANS WAS NOT DONE PROPERLY WHEN UPLOADING THE |
| PLANS. PLEASE REMOVE THE OLD SITE PLAN. THE NEW SITE |
| PLAN HAS SATISFIED THE COMMENT. |
| |
| 3. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - WHY WAS THE HARDSCAPE PLAN FOR |
| THE EAST PLAZA (HS-1) INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT? THERE |
| WERE EVEN THREE (3) COPIES OF SHEET HS-1 SUBMITTED. |
| THIS AREA WAS PERMITTED SEPARATELY AND SHOULD BE |
| REMOVED FROM THIS PLAN SET (PAGE #S MAY NEED TO BE |
| ADJUSTED). |
| |
| 4. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - SURVEY DOES NOT ACCURATELY |
| REFLECT THE CURRENT CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. PLEASE |
| PROVIDE THE MOST RECENT SURVEY. |
| |
| 5. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SEC. |
| 94-408.F.2.E. OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| REGULATIONS, FREESTANDING SIGNS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF |
| FIVE (5) FEET FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| |
| 5.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE ARE TWO (2) VERSIONS OF THE |
| SITE PLAN IN THE SYSTEM. IT APPEARS THAT VERSIONING OF |
| THE PLANS WAS NOT DONE PROPERLY WHEN UPLOADING THE |
| PLANS. PLEASE REMOVE THE OLD SITE PLAN. THE NEW SITE |
| PLAN HAS SATISFIED THE COMMENT. |
| ________________________________________ |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| ________________________________________ |
| |
| QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| |
| JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| |
| P: 561.822.1448 |
| TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| E: [email protected] |
| |
| W: WPB.ORG |
| |