Plan Review Notes For Permit 20070687 |
Permit Number |
20070687 |
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
Sequence Number |
1 |
|
Notes |
Date |
Text |
2020-07-20 10:07:23 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) SHEET ALS 1.1 - THERE IS AN INCORRECT INDICATION OR | | MISREPRESENTATION OF THE DIAGONAL DISTANCE. | | | | THE DIAGONAL DISTANCE MUST REPRESENT THE ENTIRE AREA | | SERVED. | | | | THE DIAGONAL DISTANCE MUST EXTEND TO THE OPPOSITE | | EXISTING OFFICE SPACE. | | | | THE EXIT SEPARATION INDICATION IS POINTING TO AN EXIT | | ACCESS POINT NOT THE ACTUAL EXIT. | | | | THE EXIT SEPARATION LINE MUST EXTEND TO THE EXISTING | | EXIT DOOR TO THE WAREHOUSE. | | | | PER NFPA 101, CH 7 MEANS OF EGRESS | | | | 7.5.1.3.3 IN BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN | | APPROVED, | | SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH SECTION | | 9.7, THE MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN TWO EXITS, | | EXIT | | ACCESSES, OR EXIT DISCHARGES, MEASURED IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH 7.5.1.3.2, | | SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN ONE-THIRD THE LENGTH OF THE | | MAXIMUM OVERALL | | DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE BUILDING OR AREA TO BE | | SERVED. | | | | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. | | | | | | | | 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET | | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE | | ABOVE. | | | | | | | | 3) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE | | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | FIRE MARSHAL | | 561-804-4709 | | [email protected] | | |
|