Date |
Text |
2020-11-04 10:07:46 | 2017 FBC- BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| W. P. B. PERMIT: 20040980 |
| ADD: 2417 SPRUCE AVE./ WHOLE BUILDING |
| CONT: UNITED CONSTRUCTION PARTNERS |
| CONT. TEL: 561-337-4441 |
| CONT. E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| OTHER TEL: 561-0742 |
| OTHER E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD: JAIRO A. ROJAS PE: 54859 |
| |
| 4X FEE / NOTICE!!!!! FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) WITH |
| RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS? |
| DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2017 WEST PALM BEACH |
| AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| ADMINISTRATION |
| |
| 2017 EXISTING BUILDING CODE. 801.3 COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW |
| CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES |
| SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA |
| BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| |
| 4THREVIEW |
| DATE: WED. NOV. 04TH/ 2020 |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| 1) COMPLIED, 1 TENANT THE WHOLE BUILDING. |
| |
| 2) THE PERMIT APPLICATION UNDER THE DESCRIPTION OF WORK |
| STATES. AFTER THE FACT PERMIT FOR NEW BAR AND MOVING OF |
| NON-WEIGHT BEARING WALL. |
| 2A)SEMI COMPLIED. SHEET S1.1. PLEASE NOTE THERE IS |
| STILL A ISSUE WITH OCCUPANCY TYPE AND OCCUPANT LOAD FOR |
| THIS BUILDING. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY YOU CONSIDER THIS A |
| MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY. IN THE 2017 FBC-B SECTION 309.1 |
| MERCANTILE OCCUPANCIES ARE WHERE DISPLAY AND SALE OF |
| MERCHANDISE AND INVOLVES STOCKS AND GOODS, WARES OR |
| MERCHANDISE INCIDENTAL TO SUCH PURPOSES AND ACCESSIBLE |
| TO THE PUBLIC. WE USE THE TABLE 1004.1.2 OF THE |
| FBC-BUILDING TO DETERMINE OCCUPANT LOAD. THIS BUILDING |
| HAS AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF MORE THAN 50 PEOPLE. THE |
| BUSINESS TAX LICENSE INDICATES THAT IT WILL BE SELLING |
| KAVA AND TEA, TO BE CONSUMED (DRINK) ON THE PREMISES. |
| THIS WOULD CLASSIFY THIS ESTABLISHMENT AS A BAR, |
| CONSUMPTION OF DRINK, A A2 OCCUPANCY (FBC-B 303.3). |
| NOTE, WHEN AN A2 OCCUPANCY HAS AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF LESS |
| THAN 50 IT IS CONSIDERED A BUSINESS OCCUPANCY NOT |
| MERCANTILE (FBC-B 303.1.2(1). |
| |
| 2A)(2) PLEASE NOTE THE SQ. FOOTAGE HAS BEEN REDUCED IN |
| THE KAVA BAR ROOM AND LOUNGE AND THE OCCUPANT LOAD. IN |
| CONVERSATION WITH WHO I THOUGHT WAS THE DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD, I HAD STATED YOU COULD REDUCE THE OCCUPANT LOAD |
| IN THOSE ROOMS BY TAKING THE AREA BEHIND THE BAR OUT OF |
| THE 15 FT/ OCCUPANT LOAD AND USE THE 200 SQ. FT PER |
| OCCUPANT LOAD JUST LIKE THE KITCHEN, EMPLOYEES ONLY IN |
| THAT AREA. THE AREA BEHIND THE BAR HAS NOT BEEN |
| INCLUDED IN THE NEW CALCULATIONS. |
| |
| 2A)(3) SHEET S1.1. NOTE ON THIS SHEET I?VE CIRCLED ALL |
| OF THE INCONSISTENCIES THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. |
| REFERENCES TO THE RESIDENTIAL CODE TO AMOUNT OF |
| OCCUPANTS, AND OCCUPANT LOAD AND MEANS OF EGRESS |
| WIDTHS. |
| |
| 2A)(4) SHEET S1.1 BENEATH THE OCCUPANT LOAD TABLE IS A |
| STATEMENT ABOUT THE EXCEPTION (SUBSTITUTION) TO THE |
| NEED OF DRINKING FOUNTAINS THIS IS FOUND IN THE 2017 |
| FBC-PLUMBING SECTION 410.4 FOR RESTAURANTS NOT FOR A |
| MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY. THE PLUMBING PLAN REVIEWER WILL |
| DECIDE IF BARS WOULD BE ALLOWED UNDER THE SUBSTITUTION |
| RULE. |
| |
| 3RD ROUND OF COMMENTS. IT WOULD APPEAR THE NEW USE IS A |
| MIXED USE OCCUPANCY SINCE THERE ARE ELEMENTS OF AN: |
| A-2 OCCUPANCY- KAVA BAR, 677/15= 46 OCCUPANTS (WHOLE |
| NUMBERS OCCUPANTS ALWAYS ROUND UP) |
| COMMERCIAL KITCHEN,258/200= 2 RESPONSE SHOWS THE |
| KITCHEN WILL NOT BE USED, THEN REMOVE IT FROM THE |
| PLANS. |
| SITTING AREA, 556/15= 38 |
| A-3 POOL & BILLIARDS PARLOR, 377/50= 8 |
| UNDEFINED ROOM DRINKING FOUNTAIN, |
| 12.5X 13= 162/15= 11 |
| STORAGE ROOM, 481/300= 2 |
| 2 BATHROOMS100 SF/100= 1 |
| TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD 108 MAY VERY SOME FOR UNKNOWN USE. |
| 2017 FBC-B TABLE 1001004.1.2. |
| |
| 1ST ROUND OF COMMENT. THIS PERMIT IS FLAGGED AS A |
| CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY BUT THE PLAN DOES NOT STATE WHAT |
| THE PREVIOUS OCCUPANT TYPE WAS IT APPEARS THE PROPOSED |
| OCCUPANCY IS TO BE MERCANTILE. PLEASE NOTE THERE IS A |
| BUSINESS LICENSE APPLIED FOR LAST OCT. 2019 FOR HIDE |
| OUT TEA L.L.C. A LIMITED USE RESTAURANT FOR THE USE OF |
| TEA, KAVA & COFFEE. IF THIS IS THE SAME USE PLEASE |
| PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY SHEET WITH THE ACTUAL USE FOR |
| EACH ROOM, IDENTIFY EACH ROOM, SQ. FOOTAGE & OCCUPANT |
| LOAD AND A TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE TENANT SPACE. |
| SHOW ALL FURNITURE COUNTERS, KITCHEN EQUIPMENT, AND |
| EGRESS PATH FOR ALL AREAS OF THE TENANT SPACE. NOTE THE |
| SUBMITTED FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE |
| INFORMATION TO BE ABLE TO COMPLETE A COMMERCIAL PLAN |
| REVIEW. |
| 107.3.5. MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS. |
| 107.3.5.1 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS. |
| 107.3.5.1.1BUILDING |
| OCCUPANCY GROUP OR GROUPS |
| MINIMUM TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION |
| LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS: |
| A) IS THERE AN EXISTING FIRE SPRINKLER? |
| B) IS THERE AN EXISTING FIRE ALARM? |
| OCCUPANCY LOAD/ EGRESS REQUIREMENTS SHALL INCLUDE |
| LIFE SAFETY PLAN |
| OCCUPANT LOAD |
| GROSS |
| NET |
| MEANS OF EGRESS |
| COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL |
| MEANS OF EGRESS INCLUDE |
| A) EXIT ACCESS |
| B) EXIT |
| C) EXIT DISCHARGE |
| ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS SHALL INCLUDE: |
| A) SITE REQUIREMENTS |
| B) ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE AND ROUTE |
| C) TOILET & BATHING FACILITIES |
| D) DRINKING FOUNTAINS |
| E) ACCESSIBLE DINING FACILITIES |
| |
| 2B) 109.3* BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. IF, IN THE |
| OPINION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE CLAIMED VALUATION |
| OF BUILDING, ALTERATION, STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, GAS, |
| MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING SYSTEMS APPEARS TO BE |
| UNDERESTIMATED ON THE APPLICATION, THE PERMIT SHALL BE |
| DENIED. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS |
| AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL REPLACEMENT PURPOSES, |
| VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL |
| REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, |
| PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISHES, NORMAL SITE |
| WORK (EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR BUILDINGS), |
| ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, MARKETING COST, OVERHEAD |
| AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY LAND VALUE. VALUATION |
| REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST PUBLISHED DATA OF |
| NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES |
| (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.) WITH REGIONAL ADJUSTMENTS |
| FOR LOCATION AS PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE |
| CONGRESS. |
| |
| 2C)NOT APPLICABLE. |
| |
| 2D) DISPROPORTIONATE COST. PLEASE REVIEW HOW YOU ARE TO |
| MEET DISPROPORTIONATE COST. EITHER THE CONTRACTOR OR |
| THE DESIGNER OF RECORD ON THEIR LETTERHEAD ARE TO |
| PROVIDE ON THEIR LETTERHEAD HOW THEY ARE GOING TO SPEND |
| THE 20% DISPROPORTIONATE FUNDS IN THE ORDER LISTED |
| BELOW. 2017 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY CODE: |
| 202.4.1. DISPROPORTIONATE COST. ALTERATIONS MADE TO |
| PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL TO THE ALTERED |
| AREA WILL BE DEEMED DISPROPORTIONATE TO THE OVERALL |
| ALTERATION WHEN THE COST EXCEEDS 20% OF THE COST OF THE |
| ALTERATION TO THE PRIMARY FUNCTION AREA. COST THAT MAY |
| BE COUNTED AS EXPENDITURES REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AN |
| ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL MAY INCLUDE: (I) COST |
| ASSOCIATED WITH PROVIDING AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE AND AN |
| ACCESSIBLE ROUT TO THE ALTERED AREA; (II) COST |
| ASSOCIATED WITH MAKING RESTROOMS ACCESSIBLE, SUCH AS |
| INSTALLING GRAB BARS, ENLARGING TOILET STALLS, |
| INSULATING PIPES, OR INSTALLING ACCESSIBLE FAUCET |
| CONTROLS; (III) COST ASSOCIATED WITH PROVIDING |
| ACCESSIBLE TELEPHONES, SUCH AS RELOCATING THE TELEPHONE |
| TO AN ACCESSIBLE HEIGHT, INSTALLING AMPLIFICATION |
| DEVICES, OR INSTALLING A TEXT TELEPHONE (TTY); (IV) |
| COST ASSOCIATED WITH RELOCATING AN ACCESSIBLE DRINKING |
| FOUNTAIN. |
| |
| |
| 2E) 4TH REQUEST!!!! ACCESSIBILITY CODE/ DINING |
| SURFACES. |
| THE SUBMITTED FLOOR PLAN S1.1 DOES NOT SHOW COMPLIANCE |
| WITH THE 2017 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY CODE; |
| 2E)(1) 226.1 WHERE DINING SURFACES ARE PROVIDED FOR THE |
| CONSUMPTION OF DRINK, AT LEAST 5 PERCENT OF THE SEATING |
| SPACES AND STANDING SPACES AT THE DINING SURFACES SHALL |
| COMPLY WITH 902. |
| |
| 2E)(2) DISPERSION. DINING SURFACES AND WORK SURFACES |
| REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH 902 SHALL BE DISPERSED |
| THROUGHOUT THE SPACE OR FACILITY CONTAINING DINING |
| SURFACES AND WORK SURFACES. |
| |
| |
| 2E)(3) 206.2.5 206.2.5 RESTAURANTS AND CAFETERIAS. IN |
| RESTAURANTS AND CAFETERIAS, AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL |
| BE PROVIDED TO ALL DINING AREAS, INCLUDING RAISED OR |
| SUNKEN DINING AREAS, AND OUTDOOR DINING AREAS. |
| |
| 2E)(4) 902.1 .DINING SURFACES AND WORK SURFACES SHALL |
| COMPLY WITH 902.2 AND 902.3. ADVISORY 902.1 GENERAL. |
| DINING SURFACES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, BARS, |
| TABLES, LUNCH COUNTERS, AND BOOTHS. EXAMPLES OF WORK |
| SURFACES INCLUDE WRITING SURFACES, STUDY CARRELS, |
| STUDENT LABORATORY STATIONS, BABY CHANGING AND OTHER |
| TABLES OR FIXTURES FOR PERSONAL GROOMING, COUPON |
| COUNTERS, AND WHERE COVERED BY THE ADA SCOPING |
| PROVISIONS, EMPLOYEE WORK STATIONS. |
| |
| 2E)(5))(1) 902.2 CLEAR FLOOR OR GROUND SPACE. A CLEAR |
| FLOOR SPACE COMPLYING WITH 305 POSITIONED FOR A FORWARD |
| APPROACH SHALL BE PROVIDED. KNEE AND TOE CLEARANCE |
| COMPLYING WITH 306 SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| |
| 2E)(5))(2) 902.3 HEIGHT. THE TOPS OF DINING SURFACES |
| AND WORK SURFACES SHALL BE 28 INCHES MINIMUM AND 34 |
| INCHES MAXIMUM ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR OR GROUND. |
| |
| 2F) THE SUBMITTED PLAN DOES NOT SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH |
| THE 2017 FBC-B SECTION 2902.1.1 FIXTURE CALCULATIONS |
| AND TABLE 2902.1.1.DEPENDING ON USAGE. |
| |
| 2G) 3RD REQUEST. THE SUBMITTED FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT SHOW |
| A DETAIL FOR THE RESTROOM/ BATHROOM FLOOR PLAN NOR |
| ELEVATIONS FOR EACH OF THE ACCESSIBLE ELEMENTS IN THE |
| BATHROOM. IN THE RESPONSE LETTER IT STATE NEW RESTROOM |
| DETAILS. WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR IN RESTROOM DETAILS |
| ARE ELEVATION DETAILS FOR (4) WALLS OF THE RESTROOM |
| WITH ALL FIXTURES DIMENSIONED, AND ALL ELEMENTS OF THE |
| RESTROOM DIMENSIONED TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE, THE |
| PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER GOES INTO GREAT DETAIL AS TO |
| WHAT INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| 2G)(1) ?(2)COMPLIED. |
| |
| 2G)(3) GRAB BARS/ RESTROOMS> 2017 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY |
| CODE SECTION 609.4 POSITION OF GRAB BARS. GRAB BARS |
| SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A HORIZONTAL POSITION, 33 INCHES |
| MINIMUM AND 36 INCHES MAXIMUM ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR |
| MEASURED TO THE TOP OF THE GRIPPING SURFACE, NOT |
| CENTERLINE. |
| |
| 2G)(4)-(6) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 2G)(7) SEE PLUMBING PLAN REVIEWERS COMMENT ON THE |
| DECOMMISSIONING OF SHOWER. SHOWER COMPARTMENTS SEE |
| SECTION 608 OF THE 2017 ACCESSIBILITY CODE. |
| |
| 2H) 2017 FBC-B 1210.2.2. WALLS & PARTITIONS. THIS |
| COMMENT IS A RESULT OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL |
| INTERPRETATION. IN RESTROOMS EPOXY PAINT IS NO LONGER |
| CONSIDERED A SMOOTH HARD, NON-ABSORBENT SURFACE. |
| WALLS & PARTITIONS WITHIN 2 FEET OF SERVICE SINKS, |
| URINALS, AND WATER CLOSETS SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH, HARD, |
| NON-ABSORBENT SURFACE TO A HEIGHT OF NOT LESS THAN 4 |
| FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR, EXCEPT FOR STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS, |
| THE MATERIAL USED IN SUCH WALLS SHALL BE OF A TYPE THAT |
| IS NOT ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY MOISTURE. |
| |
| 2509.1. WET AREAS. SHOWERS AND PUBLIC TOILET WALLS |
| SHALL COMPLY WITH 1210.2. |
| |
| 1210.2. FINISH MATERIALS. WALLS, BASE, FLOORS AND |
| PARTITIONS IN TOILET AND BATHROOMS SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| SECTIONS 1210.1 THROUGH 1210.4. |
| |
| 3) SHEET S-1-1: |
| |
| 3) COMPLIED. DOORS. |
| |
| 4) IMPACT FEES - DIGITAL SUBMITTALS: |
| PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE |
| DIGITALLY VIA PROJECT DOX UPON NOTIFICATION BY THIS |
| OFFICE. NOTIFICATION MAY OCCUR WHEN PLANS ARE NEAREST |
| FINAL FORM. YOU MAY COORDINATE WITH THE IMPACT FEE |
| OFFICE AT (561) 233-5025 OR SIMPLY UPLOAD THE MUNICIPAL |
| IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO YOUR PROJECT AND NAME |
| THE FILE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE. THE FORM |
| CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINIS |
| TRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF UPON |
| APPROVAL AND FEE PAYMENT, PLEASE UPLOAD THE RECEIPT TO |
| YOUR PROJECT OR EMAIL IT TO [email protected] . |
| PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEE OFFICE IS LOCATED AT 2300 |
| N. JOG RD. ROOMS 2W01-2W14 WEST PALM BEACH, FL. |
| |
| 5) A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW |
| COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE |
| THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR |
| PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| A THOROUGH REVIEW OF THE PLANS COULD NOT HAPPEN SINCE |
| THERE WAS A GREAT DEFICIENCY IN PLANS AND REQUIRED |
| DOCUMENTATION. WITH THE NEXT PLAN REVIEW CYCLE THERE |
| MAYBE ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS BECAUSE OF NEW PLANS |
| AND INFORMATION LACKING UNDER THE PRIOR REVIEW. |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE WE ARE WORKING FROM HOME IF YOU WOULD LIKE |
| TO CONTACT ME, MY CELL NUMBER IS 561-718-9724. |
| JAMES A. WITMER BN, PX, SFP, CBO |
| SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| BUILDING DIVISION / DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| 401 CLEMATIS ST. WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33402 |
| TEL: 561-805-6717 |
| FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |