Date |
Text |
2020-03-19 08:58:43 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| COMMENTS |
| CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 1- ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| FL511288-R17 SUBMITTED: |
| CLEARLY MARK WHICH MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES ASSEMBLY |
| FROM SEC. 5.6.3 OF PRODUCT APPROVAL IS GOING TO BE |
| USED. OR IF USING THE FRSA/TRI APRIL 2012 (04-12) |
| REVISED EDITION, THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORRMATION |
| SHOWING THE DETERMINATION OF DESIGN WIND LOADS AND |
| UNDERLAYMENT FASTENING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 5.6.3 OF |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED. |
| SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| SELECTED SYSTEM #10 ON PAGE 7 OF 10 OF FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL SUBMITTED HAS A MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE OF |
| -67.5 PSF. ACCORDING TO SEC. 5.6.3.2 ON PAGE 7 OF 10 OF |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED THIS ASSEMBLY CAN NOT BE |
| USED. FOR MECHANICALLY ATTACHED BASED SHEET THE MAXIMUM |
| DESIGN PRESSURE FOR THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY SHALL MEET OR |
| EXCEED THAT REQUIRED UNDER FRSA/TRI APPENDIX A, TABLE |
| 1A. SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THAT DESIGN |
| PRESSURE. PLEASE SELECT ANOTHER ASSEMBLY OR |
| ALTERNATIVELY, PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 |
| CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED ON SEC. 5.6.3.2 OF PRODUCT |
| PROPOSAL SUBMITTED. |
| SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |