Date |
Text |
2020-02-10 16:28:09 | ADDRESS: 103 ELWA PL. MASTER PERMIT: 19060794 |
| SUBMITTAL: 20020332 |
| |
| NFIP ? SI/SD APPRAISAL REVIEW |
| |
| CODES IN EFFECT: |
| 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION W/2017 WEST |
| PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, |
| CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION |
| FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 6TH EDITION 2017 |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE NO. 4729-17 |
| USPAP = UNIFORM STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL APPRAISAL |
| PRACTICE |
| FEMA P-758 = SI/SD DESK REFERENCE |
| |
| CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O. |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER, PX3169 |
| 1&2 FAMILY PLANS EXAMINER, SFP306 |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION |
| TEL: 561-805-6726 |
| FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| 1ST REVIEW |
| |
| TYPE OF APPRAISAL SUBMITTED: UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL |
| APPRAISAL REPORT |
| |
| RESULTS: DENIED |
| |
| THE APPRAISAL SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW IS DEFICIENT FOR THE |
| REASONS LISTED BELOW. |
| ADDRESS THE ATTACHED COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT |
| |
| 1. REF. PG. 3 OF 6 USPAP SR 2-2 (A) (I) REQUIRES |
| APPRAISERS TO REPORT THE APPRAISAL?S INTENDED USERS. |
| THE INTENDED USER ON THE SUBMITTED APPRAISAL IS THE |
| LENDER/CLIENT. NFIP REQUIRES THE CLIENT AND FLOODPLAIN |
| MANAGER TO BE LISTED AS INTENDED USERS. |
| |
| 2. REF. PG. 1 OF 6 USPAP SR 2-2 (A) (II) REQUIRES |
| APPRAISERS TO REPORT THE APPRAISAL?S INTENDED USE. THE |
| INTENDED USE OF THE SUBMITTED APPRAISAL IS TO ESTABLISH |
| MARKET VALUE FOR A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE. NFIP REQUIRES |
| APPRAISALS TO SUPPORT A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION |
| SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT/SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE |
| DETERMINATION UNDER NFIP REGULATIONS. |
| |
| 3. REF. PG. 3 OF 6 USPAP SR 2-2 (A) (V) REQUIRES |
| APPRAISERS TO STATE TYPE AND DEFINITION OF VALUE AND |
| CITE THE SOURCE OF THE DEFINITION. INDICATED VALUE BY |
| COST APPROACH ON APPRAISAL IS $ 0.00. |
| |
| 4. REF. APPRAISALS ATTACHED PHOTOS USPAP SR 2-1 (A) |
| REQUIRES APPRAISERS TO CLEARLY AND ACCURATELY SET FORTH |
| THE APPRAISAL IN A MANNER THAT IS NOT MISLEADING. |
| ATTACHED PHOTOS ARE BLACK AND WHITE PHOTOCOPIES WITH NO |
| DEFINITION OR CLARITY. |
| |
| 5. USPAP SR 1-1 (A) REQUIRES APPRAISERS TO APPLY A |
| METHODOLOGY CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENDED USE. THE |
| SUBMITTED UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL REPORT IS |
| INTENDED TO ESTABLISH MARKET VALUE FOR A REAL ESTATE |
| TRANSACTION. THE INTENDED USE OF A 50% FEMA RULE |
| APPRAISAL IS TO CALCULATE THE DEPRECIATED ACTUAL CASH |
| VALUE PER NFIP REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 6. USPAP SR 1-1 (A) REQUIRES APPRAISERS TO PROVIDE A |
| REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE FROM A RECOGNIZED COST |
| ESTIMATING SERVICE, BY ANALYSIS OF EXAMPLES OF SIMILAR |
| CONSTRUCTION OR BY ANOTHER ACCEPTABLE METHOD. THE |
| SUBMITTED APPRAISAL DOES NOT PROVIDE A REPLACEMENT COST |
| ? SEE PG. 3 OF 6. |
| |
| 7. USPAP SR 2-2 (A) (VIII) REQUIRES APPRAISERS TO |
| ESTIMATE DEPRECIATION FOLLOWING PRESCRIBED METHODOLOGY. |
| THE SUBMITTED APPRAISAL DOES NOT PROVIDE A DEPRECIATION |
| VALUE ? SEE PG. 3 OF 6. |
| |
| 8. THE VALUE OF LAND, SITE IMPROVEMENTS AND ACCESSORY |
| STRUCTURES SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM THE DEPRECIATED CASH |
| VALUE PER FEMA P- 758 SI/SD DESK REFERENCE SECTION 4.5. |
| THE SUBMITTED APPRAISAL DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY |
| DEPRECIATION VALUE ? SEE PG. 3 OF 6. |
| |
| 9. USPAP SR 2-2 (A) (VIII) REQUIRES APPRAISERS TO |
| PROVIDE REPLACEMENT COST & DEPRECIATION ESTIMATES |
| SUPPORTED BY ADEQUATE DOCUMENTATION. |
| |
| 10. PROVIDE COPY OF ORIGINAL APPRAISAL. REDUCED PRINT |
| SIZE IS TOO SMALL. |
| FBC 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. |
| CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN |
| UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE |
| AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED? |
| |
| 11. PROVIDE A COST BREAKDOWN OF REPLACEMENT COST |
| ESTIMATE BASED ON A RECOGNIZED COST ESTIMATING SERVICE. |
| |
| |
| |