Date |
Text |
2020-02-04 10:27:23 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) BUILDING REVIEW |
| COMMENTS |
| CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| NOTE: |
| BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME |
| OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| ISSUANCE. |
| |
| ****IF PROVISO OPTION IS SELECTED, THEN NEED THE ENRGY |
| CALCULATIONS SIGNED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO PERMIT |
| ISSUANCE. |
| |
| |
| |
| 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| A)THE ENERGY FORM SUBMITTED DOESN'T SEEM TO BE SIGNED |
| BY THE OWNER OF THIS BUILDING. THE OWNER'S SIGNATURE |
| SHOWN ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION AND THE SIGNATURE SHOWN |
| ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS DON'T MATCH. CLARIFY WHY. |
| NOTE: ONLY THE OWNER, ARCHITECT OR LEGAL AGENT IS |
| AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THIS FORM AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 6TH EDITION (2017). |
| |
| B) PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF |
| FORM. PROVIDE CORRECT OWNER'S AND BUILDER'S NAME. |
| PROVIDE COMPLETE ADDRESS OF THIS HOUSE. PROVIDE THE |
| PERMIT OFFICE. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| C) WALL INFORMATION ON ITEM 9 ON PAGE 1 OF 4 IS MISSING |
| THE INFORMATION FOR THE ADJACENT WALL BY THE GARAGE |
| AREA. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| D) REVISE THE ATTIC VENT RATIO ON PAGE 2 OF 5. THE |
| RATIO IS 1/150 NOT 1/300. SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| OR, PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE |
| COMPLETE DOCUMENTATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| 1/300 RATIO AS REQUIRED BY THE EXCEPTION ON SEC. |
| R806.2. |
| |
| E) BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| |
| 2- DRAWING C-1 (SITE/DRAINAGE PLAN): |
| DRAWING SUBMITTED HAVE A COPY OF A DIGITAL SIGNATURE. |
| PERMIT APPLICATION AND PLANS ARE NOT ELECTRONICALLY |
| SUBMITTED. PLANS NEED TO HAVE THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND |
| SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| 61G15-23.003 FAC AND CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING |
| PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. |
| |
| 3- THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE FOOTING SIZE |
| RECOMMENDED BY THE SOIL TEST ENGINEER AND THE FOOTING |
| SIZE SPECIFIED ON PLANS. DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW |
| SOIL TEST REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND EITHER CHANGE THE |
| FOOTING SIZE FOLLOWING THE ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS |
| OR PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT THE PROPOSED |
| FOOTING SIZE IS ADEQUATE. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 4- SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED HAVE A COPY OF THE |
| ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE. PROVIDE REPORT WITH ENGINEER'S |
| ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC |
| RECORDS. |
| |
| 5- REVISE ATTIC ACCESS DETAIL ON SHEET A-1. THE MIN. |
| DIMENSION IS 22" AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R807.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| 6- REVISE SPECS FOR GARAGE DOOR LEADING TO THE |
| RESIDENCE. IF THE DOOR IS NOT SOLID, THEN IT NEEDS TO |
| BE HONEYCOMB CORE STEEL DOOR NOT METAL CLADD DOOR. OR |
| 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED DOOR. SEC. R302.5.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE SPECS ON SHEET |
| A-1. |
| |
| 7- REVISE THE SIZE OF THE STRUCTURAL BUCK SPECIFIED ON |
| DETAIL C ON SHEET A-2. STRUCTURAL BUCK NEEDS TO PROVIDE |
| FULL SUPPORT TO THE DOOR FRAME AND NEED TO EXTEND |
| BEYOND THE INTERIOR FACE OF THE WINDOW OR DOOR FRAME AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. R609.7.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. 2X4 BUCK |
| IS SMALLER THAN THE DOOR FRAME. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 8- WALL ENTRY SECTION #3 ON SHEET A-3: |
| A) NEED TO SPECIFY 2 LAYERS OF WATER RESISTIVE BARRIERS |
| AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R703.7.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL ON THE |
| WOOD FRAMED WALL. |
| |
| B) NEED TO SPECIFY THE 7/8" MIN. STUCCO THICKNESS AS |
| REQUIRED BY TABLE R702.1(1) FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| 9- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS LOW. |
| VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S |
| OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS |
| UPDATED TO $204,585. THE PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $4718.42 |
| (INCLUDES PLAN REVIEW EXPEDITED FEE). |
| |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| NECESSARY. (NOTE: SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE). A |
| TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT |
| NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, |
| IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE |
| CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. |
| THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |