Date |
Text |
2020-02-05 18:23:00 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| NOTE: |
| BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES APPLY. CONTRACTOR TO |
| ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME OR |
| IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| ISSUANCE. |
| |
| 1- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| FOLLOWING: |
| R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 2- IT IS NOT CLEAR EXACT LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED |
| ADDITION. SETBACKS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AND SETBACKS |
| SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN ON SHEET SP-1 DON'T MATCH. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 3- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| A) PROVIDE COMPLETE/CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM. |
| PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE OWNER AND PROVIDE CORRECT NAME |
| OF THE BUILDER. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| |
| B) THE AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHGC SHOWN ON ITEM #7 ON |
| PAGE 1 OF 4 DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE MAXIMUM |
| FENESTRATION SHGC REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.5.3.4 OF |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. THE MAXIMUM AREA WEIGHTED |
| AVERAGE FENESTRATION SHGC ALLOWED IS 0.50. ENERGY |
| CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED SHOW 0.70. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO |
| COMPLY. |
| |
| C)PAGE 2 OF 4 UNDER SPACES INDICATES THAT THERE IS A |
| KITCHEN IN THE ADDITION. ZONING DOESN'T ALLOW THE |
| KITCHEN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| D) REVISE DOOR INFORMATION PAGE 3 OF 4. THERE ARE NOT |
| WOOD DOORS. SEE PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVAL AND REVISE |
| AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| E) BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| |
| 4- WALL SECTION #2 ON SHEET A-2: |
| A) NEED TO SPECIFY 2 LAYERS OF WATER RESISTIVE BARRIERS |
| AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R703.7.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL ON THE |
| WOOD FRAMED WALL. |
| |
| B) NEED TO SPECIFY THE 7/8" MIN. STUCCO THICKNESS AS |
| REQUIRED BY TABLE R702.1(1) FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| 5- REVISE ATTIC ACCESS LOCATION. NEED TO PROVIDE AT |
| LEAST 30 INCHES OF HEADROOM CLEARANCE AS REQUIRED BY |
| SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| |
| 6- SPECIFY ROOF VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SPECIFY SIZE OF GABLE END VENTS SHOWN |
| ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND CLEARLY SPECIFY IF THERE |
| ARE VENTS LOCATED ON THE SOFFIT (SPECIFY SIZE AND |
| SPACING). |
| |
| 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO |
| INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| |
| A) GABLE END VENTS AS SHOWN ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. |
| |
| 8- ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 9- REVISE THE SIZE OF THE STRUCTURAL BUCK SPECIFIED ON |
| ON DETAIL C AND E ON SHEET A-2. STRUCTURAL BUCK NEEDS |
| TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO THE DOOR FRAME AND NEED TO |
| EXTEND BEYOND THE INTERIOR FACE OF THE WINDOW OR DOOR |
| FRAME AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R609.7.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| 2X4 BUCK IS SMALLER THAN THE DOOR FRAME. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. |
| |
| 10- TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED: |
| A) TRUSSES WERE DESIGNED BASED ON BUILDING EXPOSURE B. |
| THIS DOESN'T MATCH THE ARCHITECT'S WIND DESIGN CRITERIA |
| ON SHEET A-2. TRUSS ENGINEER TO REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| B) TRUSS LOADING SPECIFICATIONS DON'T MATCH ARCHITECT'S |
| LOADING LOADING SPECIFICATIONS |
| ON THE ROOF FRAMING NOTES ON SHEET S-1. TRUSS ENGINEER |
| TO REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| C) ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW/APPROVED THE TRUSS |
| PACKAGE PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. SEC. |
| 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 11- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS |
| LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN |
| PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $48,011. THE |
| PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $1126.88. |
| |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| NECESSARY. (NOTE: SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE). A |
| TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT |
| NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, |
| IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE |
| CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. |
| THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |