Date |
Text |
2019-12-20 15:18:02 | |
| RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION/ADDITION SECOND BUILDING |
| REVIEW COMMENTS |
| CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| NOTE: |
| BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME |
| OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| ISSUANCE. |
| |
| |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 1- GARAGE IS CONVERTED TO ADDITIONAL LIVABLE AREA. |
| PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| SEC. 1106 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND SEC. R101.5 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| NOTE: PLEASE MAKE SURE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE SIGNED |
| BY ALL THE REQUIRED PARTIES AND COORDINATE WITH PLANS |
| TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| A) ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED IS REQUIRED TO BE |
| CERTIFIED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FORM BY THE OWNER, THE |
| OWNER'S ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY |
| DESIGNED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO RECEIVE THE PERMIT AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, |
| 6TH EDITION (2017). |
| |
| B) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| INCLUDING THE BUILDER'S NAME. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| C) REVISE ITEM # 1. THIS IS NO NEW CONSTRUCTION. THIS |
| IS EXISTING CONSTRUCTION. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| |
| D)PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE PERSON DOING THE CALCULATIONS |
| AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| E) "SPACES" INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 SPECIFIES THAT THERE |
| IS NOT KITCHEN. THIS IS INCORRECT. ACCORDING TO THE |
| CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA SPECIFIED (2586 S.F.) THESE |
| CALCULATIONS ARE DONE FOR ENTIRE HOUSE. THERE IS A |
| KITCHEN IN THIS HOUSE. ALSO, CLARIFY WHY THERE ARE ZERO |
| BEDROOMS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH PLANS. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| F)REVISE THE ATTIC VENT RATIO ON PAGE 3. THE RATIO IS |
| 1/150 NOT 1/300. SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. OR, |
| PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE |
| COMPLETE DOCUMENTATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| 1/300 RATIO AS REQUIRED BY THE EXCEPTION ON SEC. |
| R806.2. |
| |
| G) WINDOWS INFORMATION ON PAGE 4 IS INCORRECT. REVISE |
| WINDOWS ORIENTATION, AREA AND OVERHANG DEPTH AND |
| SEPARATION TO MATCH PLANS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| |
| 2- OK |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 3- PLANS DON'T SPECIFY THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. 1101.1 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND SEC. |
| R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SPECIFY THE ULTIMATE AND |
| NOMINAL WIND LOADS, BUILDING EXPOSURE AND PROVIDE THE |
| DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL DOORS AND WINDOWS. |
| NOTE: THIS HOUSE IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D". SEC. |
| R301.2.1.4.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REVISE COMPONENTS AND CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURES |
| PROVIDED UNDER THE DESIGN CRITERIA. ARCHITECT SPECIFIES |
| THAT THE DESIGN PRESSURES PROVIDED ARE FOR THE WORST |
| CASE SCENARIO. |
| DESIGN PRESSURES PROVIDED ARE TOO LOW. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. WORST CASE SCENARIO WOULD BE AN EFFECTIVE |
| AREA OF 10S.F. IN ZONE 5 FOR WALLS AND 10S.F IN ZONE 3 |
| FOR ROOFS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. OR PROVIDE THE DESIGN |
| PRESSURES FOR THE ACTUAL WALL OPENING SIZE AND |
| LOCATION. |
| TABLE R301.2(2) FBC-RESIDENTIAL WITH APPLICABLE |
| ADJUSTMENTS FROM TABLE R301.2(3) FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| SEC. 1101.1 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND FAC 61G20-3.001 |
| FOR: |
| |
| A) SLIDING GLASS DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| NOA 12-0612.16 EXPIRED ON AUGUST 03,2016. AND IS |
| MISSING THE INSTALLATION DRAWINGS. |
| NOTE: THIS NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE BUILDING |
| OFFICIAL (OUT OF OFFICE TODAY) |
| |
| B) OK |
| |
| C) OK |
| |
| 5- ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| THIS IS TO BE COORDINATED WITH SLIDING GLASS DOORS |
| APPROVAL. |
| |
| |
| 6- OK |
| |
| 7- IMPACT FEES - |
| PLANS REQUIRE REVIEW BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. CALL |
| (561) 233-5025. UPON APPROVAL OF PLANS, YOU MAY CHECK |
| OUT ONE PLAN SET AND TAKE TO THAT OFFICE FOR REVIEW. |
| PLEASE RETURNED STAMPED AND WITH A COPY OF THE RECEIPT |
| AS APPLICABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE |
| QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. THE |
| FORM CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/AD |
| MINISTRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF |
| |
| |
| 8- FOR INFORMATION ONLY: THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED IN |
| FLOOD ZONE AE WITH THE BASE FLOOD BFE: 7 FEET BASED ON |
| NAVD 1988. AFTER MEETING WITH ROBERT BROWN AND OWNERS |
| (JOHNSON JEREMY AND JOHNSON RITA) IT WAS DETERMINED |
| THAT WORK WAS DONE BY PREVIOUS OWNER WITHOUT PERMITS. |
| CURRENT OWNER PURCHASED THE HOUSE ON APRIL 2012. |
| THEREFORE, THIS WORK DOESN'T COUNT FOR THE FIVE YEAR |
| PERIOD TO BE CONSIDERED BY CITY ORDINANCE TO DETERMINE |
| IF THIS WORK WOULD BE CONSIDERED "SUBSTANTIAL |
| IMPROVEMENT". FUTURE WORK WILL BE CONSIDERED TO |
| DETERMINE IF THE SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT THRESHOLD IS |
| MET. |
| |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| COOPERATION. |
| |
| IN ORDER TO AVOID MULTIPLE SUBMITTALS, PLEASE FEEL FREE |
| TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE |
| COMMENTS, |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |
| |