Date |
Text |
2019-09-10 08:58:24 | 2017 FBC- BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| W. P. B. PERMIT: 19090089 |
| ADD: 1022 CLEARWATER PARK |
| CONT: MASTER CONTRACTORS |
| TEL: 561-248-5498 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| 2017 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2017 WEST PALM BEACH |
| AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| ADMINISTRATION. |
| |
| 2017 EXISTING BUILDING CODE. 801.3 COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW |
| CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES |
| SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA |
| BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| |
| 1ST REVIEW |
| DATE: TUES. SEPT. 10/2019 |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| 1) SHEET COVERSHEET: |
| 1A) OCCUPANT LOADS BUSINESS OCCUPANCY IS STATED AT 20 |
| SQ. FT. PLEASE REVIEW 2017 FBC-B TABLE 1004.1.2 |
| BUSINESS OCCUPANCY OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR IS 100 SQ. FT. |
| PER OCCUPANT. BUSINESS AREA 4347/ 100= 44 OCCUPANTS. |
| |
| 1B) OCCUPANT LOADS STORAGE OCCUPANCY IS STATED AT 300 |
| SQ. FT. THIS IS CORRECT. PLEASE REVIEW 2015 FBC-B |
| COMMENTARY THAT THERE CANNOT BE FRACTIONAL PARTS OF AN |
| OCCUPANT YOU ALWAYS ROUND UP TO THE NEXT WHOLE NUMBER. |
| ALSO SEE BOAF INFORMAL INTERPRETATION ON LINE. |
| |
| 1C) OCCUPANT LOADS. THE BUSINESS OCCUPANCY AS STATED |
| 218 PLUS THE 1 OCCUPANT FROM THE STORAGE OCCUPANCY IS |
| 219 OCCUPANTS. HOW DO YOU COME UP WITH 230 OCCUPANTS? |
| 107.2.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. TOTAL |
| OCCUPANTS 44 +1 = 45 TOTAL OCCUPANTS. |
| |
| 1D) THE SQUARE FOOT AREAS OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS |
| DOES NOT TOTAL THE GROSS SQUARE FOOT AREA GIVEN BY |
| DEFINITION. FLOOR AREA, GROSS. THE FLOOR AREA OF A |
| BUILDING, OR PORTION THEREOF, NOT PROVIDED WITH |
| SURROUNDING EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE THE USABLE AREA |
| UNDER THE HORIZONTAL PROJECTION OF THE ROOF OR FLOOR |
| ABOVE. THE GROSS FLOOR AREA SHALL NOT INCLUDE SHAFTS |
| WITH NO OPENINGS OR INTERIOR COURTS. IT WOULD APPEAR |
| THE AREA BETWEEN BUILDINGS 1-2 AND BUILDING 3 THE AREA |
| 6.25 FT. X 75.5 = 471.875 SQ. FT. IS NOT BEING INCLUDED |
| IN THE AREA CALCULATION FOR FLOOR AREA GROSS. THEN ADD |
| THE ADDITIONAL SQ. FEET OF THE ADDITION995 SQ. FT. |
| |
| 1E) DISCREPANCY IN PLANS. DEPENDING ON WHICH PAGE IN |
| THE PLANS YOU GET A DIFFERENT SQUARE FOOT NUMBER FOR |
| THE ADDITION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED |
| 107.2.1.2. PLEASE CORRECT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE |
| ADDITION. |
| COVERSHEET FLOORPLAN THE ADDITION IS---------995 SQ. |
| FT. |
| SHEET SP-2 BUILDING 3 ADDITION CALCS. IS------985 SQ. |
| FT. |
| SHEET A-1 BUILDING 3 ADDITION IS---------------985 SQ. |
| FT. |
| SHEET M-1 BUILDING 3 ADDITION IS LISTED AS--795 SQ. FT. |
| |
| 1F) UNDER THE HEADING CALCULATION OF WORK THE PLANS |
| STATE A LEVEL III ALTERATION. PLEASE REVIEW THE 2017 |
| EXISTING BUILDING CODE CLASSIFICATION OF WORK SECTION |
| 507. 507.1 SCOPE. PROVISIONS FOR ADDITIONS SHALL APPLY |
| WHERE WORK IS CLASSIFIED AS AN ADDITION AS DEFINED IN |
| CHAPTER 2. ADDITION. AN EXTENSION OR INCREASE IN FLOOR |
| AREA, NUMBER OF STORIES, OR HEIGHT OF A BUILDING OR |
| STRUCTURE. ADDITIONS ARE FOUND IN CHAPTER 11 OF THE |
| 2017 EXISTING BUILDING CODE. NOT LEVEL III. |
| |
| 2) SHEET A-1, A-3 & A-4 THE WALL PLAN LEGEND INDICATES |
| THE NEW INTERIOR WALLS OF THE ADDITION SOME ARE |
| INDICATED AS NEW AND SOME AS EXISTING AS WELL AS IN THE |
| EXISTING BUILDING THE WALL DESIGNATION TYPE IS |
| INDICATED AS ALL NEW WALLS? THE CITY FILE NET FOR |
| RECORD RETENTION SHOWS PERMIT 15060795 FOR THIS SAME |
| BUILDING AND THE WALL LOCATION UNDER THAT PERMIT ARE IN |
| THE SAME LOCATION. 107.2.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS |
| REQUIRED. |
| |
| 3) SHEET A-2 NOTE ON THE PLAN EAST ELEVATION THAT |
| INDICATES THE USE OF NEW JOIST HANGER TO BE SIMPSON SEE |
| A-4. SHEET A-4 DOES NOT SHOW THE USE OF ANY JOIST |
| HANGER. SHEET A-5 DOES SHOW THE NEW ROOF FRAMING |
| MEMBERS TO BE PRESSURE TREATED 2X10 YELLOW PINE. DETAIL |
| 1 OF SHEET A-5 SHOWS THE 2X10 NOT IN A HANGER BUT |
| SITTING ON TOP OF THE EXISTING CONCRETE BEAM. |
| DISCREPANCY IN PLANS. 107.2.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| IS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 4) SHEET A-5 DETAIL 1 INDICATES THE USE OF P. T. 2X10 |
| RAFTERS. AS DEPICTED THEY ARE DRAWN IN THE SAME SIZE AS |
| THE 2X4 BOTTOM CHORD OF THE TRUSSES. THE ROOF LINE WILL |
| INTERSECT FURTHER UP THE TRUSS LINE WHEN DRAWN AS A |
| 2X10. PLEASE NOTE THE EXISTING CONCRETE BEAM SHEET A-2 |
| INDICATES THE BEAM ELEVATION AT 8 FEET ABOVE FINISH |
| FLOOR. DETAIL 1 SHEET A-5 ALSO SHOWS THE FURTHEST WALL |
| FROM THE EXISTING BUILDING (WALL THE RAFTERS SIT ON AT |
| 8 FEET ELEVATION ABOVE FINISH FLOOR OR NO SLOPE ON THE |
| RAFTERS. THE DESIGNER OF RECORD HAS SUBMITTED GAF |
| RUBEROID MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING SYSTEM NOA |
| 18-0919.12. PLEASE NOTE UNDER THE 2017 FBC-B SECTION |
| 1507.11.1 THE SLOPE SHALL BE 2-PERCENT SLOPE OR NOT |
| LESS THAN ? UNIT VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL OR A 4 |
| INCH DIFFERENCE IN HEIGHT MINIMUM. |
| |
| 5) SHEET A-5 DETAILS 1 & 2 SHOW P. T. 2X10 RAFTERS AT 2 |
| FEET ON CENTER. SHEET A-5 DOES NOT GIVE US THE LIVE AND |
| DEAD LOADS NOR THE GRADE OF WOOD NOR THE BENDING DESIGN |
| VALUES FB. PLEASE NOTE ON THE SHEET A-0 THERE ARE NO |
| DESIGN VALUES FOR DIMENSIONAL 2X10S. THERE ARE DESIGN |
| VALUES FOR TRUSSES OF 30 PSF ROOF LIVE LOAD AND 25 PSF |
| FOR SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOADS. WITHIN THE FBC-B THE |
| TABLES 2308.7.2(2) THE DEAD LOAD STOPS AT 20 PSF AND |
| DEFLECTION OF 240. THE SAME HOLDS TRUE FOR SPAN TABLES |
| FOR JOIST AND RAFTERS FROM THE AMERICAN WOOD COUNCIL |
| TABLE R-10. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR |
| GRADE OF WOOD TO BE USED AND DEAD LOAD AND DEFLECTION |
| TO BE ABLE TO DETERMINE THE TIMBER SIZE. |
| |
| 6) SHEET A-5 DETAIL # 2 INDICATES THE FINISH FLOOR |
| LEVEL BUT DOES NOT PROVIDE WHAT FINISH GRADE WILL BE? |
| DETAIL # 1 ON THE SAME SHEET DOES SHOW GRADE 6 INCHES |
| LOWER THAN FINISH FLOOR. THERE ARE 2 AREAS OF CONCERN: |
| 6A) THAT THE FOUNDATION SHALL COMPLY WITH 2017 FBC-B |
| SECTION 1809.4. THE MINIMUM DEPTH OF THE FOUNDATION |
| BELOW THE UNDISTURBED GROUND SURFACE SHALL BE 12 |
| INCHES. |
| |
| 6B) THE SECOND ISSUE FOUND IS THE NOT KNOWING WHERE THE |
| FINISH GRADE IS AND THE USE OF STUCCO AND WOOD |
| SUB-SHEATHING POSSIBLY AT GRADE. 2017 FBC-B SECTION |
| 2304.12.1.5. BETWEEN GRADE AND WOOD SIDING AND OR WOOD |
| SUB-SHEATHING ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING SHALL NOT |
| BE LESS THAN 6 INCHES UNLESS THE WALL SHEATHING IS |
| NATURALLY DURABLE WOOD OR PRESSURE TREATED WOOD. |
| |
| 7) SHEET A-0 DOES NOT REQUIRE A SOILS TEST, PLEASE SHOW |
| COMPLIANCE WITH 2017 FBC-B 1803.5.2 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. |
| WHERE THE CLASSIFICATION, STRENGTH OR COMPRESSIBILITY |
| OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE |
| SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE |
| BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE PERMITTED TO REQUIRE THAT A |
| GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BE CONDUCTED. |
| |
| 8) SHEET A-5 SHOWS DETAIL 1 & 2 OF THE EXISTING ROOF |
| AND THE TIE-IN OF THE NEW ADDITION AND ROOF LINE. THE |
| PLANS ARE SILENT AS TO HOW VENTILATION FOR ATTICS WILL |
| BE ACHIEVED? PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2017 FBC-B |
| SECTION 1203.2. |
| |
| 9) THIS REVIEW THERE WERE NO DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR |
| ENERGY COMPLIANCE. PLEAS SHOW HOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| 2017 ENERGY CODE WILL BE ACHIEVED. |
| C401.2 APPLICATION. |
| COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH ONE OF THE |
| FOLLOWING: |
| |
| 1.THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1, EXCLUDING |
| SECTION 9.4.1.1(G) OF THE STANDARD. |
| |
| 2.THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS C402 THROUGH C405. IN |
| ADDITION, COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| SECTION C406 AND TENANT SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| SECTION C406.1.1. |
| |
| 3.THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS C402.5, C403.2, C404, |
| C405.2, C405.3, C405.5, C405.6 AND C407. THE BUILDING |
| ENERGY COST SHALL BE EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN 85 PERCENT |
| OF THE STANDARD REFERENCE DESIGN BUILDING. |
| C101.5 COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF |
| FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, ENERGY CONSERVATION?COMMERCIAL |
| PROVISIONS. |
| |
| C101.5.1 COMPLIANCE MATERIALS. THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| COMMISSION SHALL APPROVE SPECIFIC COMPUTER SOFTWARE. |
| THE CODE OFFICIAL SHALL BE PERMITTED TO APPROVE |
| WORKSHEETS, COMPLIANCE MANUALS AND OTHER SIMILAR |
| MATERIALS THAT MEET THE INTENT OF THIS CODE. |
| |
| |
| 10) IMPACT FEES- PAPER SUBMITTALS. PLANS REQUIRE REVIEW |
| BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. CALL (561) 233-5025. UPON |
| APPROVAL, YOU MAY CHECK OUT ONE PLAN SET AND TAKE TO |
| THAT OFFICE FOR REVIEW. PLEASE RETURNED STAMPED AND |
| WITH A COPY OF THE RECEIPT AS APPLICABLE. PLEASE |
| PROVIDE THE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO |
| THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. THE FORM CAN BE FOUND AT: |
| HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/ADMINISTRATION/PDF/IMPAC |
| TFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF |
| |
| 11) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE |
| REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES |
| AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| COOPERATION. |
| |
| A THOROUGH REVIEW OF THE PLANS COULD NOT HAPPEN SINCE |
| THERE WAS A GREAT DEFICIENCY IN PLANS AND REQUIRED |
| DOCUMENTATION. WITH THE NEXT PLAN REVIEW CYCLE THERE |
| MAYBE ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS BECAUSE OF NEW PLANS |
| AND INFORMATION LACKING UNDER THE PRIOR REVIEW. |
| |
| |
| JAMES A. WITMER BN, PX, CBO |
| SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| BUILDING DIVISION / DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| 401 CLEMATIS ST. WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33402 |
| TEL: 561-805-6717 |
| FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |
| |