Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 19021070
Permit Number 19021070
Review Stop FIRE
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2019-07-03 11:02:28THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1) IN READING THE RESPONSE TO FIRE COMMENTS FROM
 GLIDDEN SPINA, THERE APPEARS TO SOME
 MISCOMMUNICATIONS/MISUNDERSTANDINGS.
  
 THERE CAN NOT BE OPPOSING EXITS AS PROPOSED. EXITS
 SHALL BE IN ONE DIRECTION.
  
 THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT THERE IS A CHALLANGE TO COMPLY
 WITH THE EXITING CODE WITH THIS CONFIGURATION.
  
 ONCE THE FRONT DOORS WERE REMOVED FROM THE EXPANSION
 AREA, IT CREATED A CONFLICT WITH THE CODE. I WAS
 ADVISED THAT THE BLDG. DEPT. REQUIRED THOSE DOORS TO BE
 REMOVED. I DO NOT SEE THOSE COMMENTS.
  
 PER THE PLANS, THERE IS A RATED WALL WITH THE DOOR
 OPENING BETWEEN THEM. ONCE THAT DOOR IS REMOVED IT
 CREATES ONE OCCUPANCY AND TWO EXITS ARE REQUIRED FROM
 THAT ONE OCCUPANCY.
  
 THE PROPOSED CONFLICTING DIRECTIONAL EXITS SIGNS ARE
 NONCOMPLIANT.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING IS FOR RECOMMENDATION AND DISSCUSSION
 PURPOSES.
  
 1) REPLACE THE DOOR WITH A RATED DOOR CONSISTENT WITH
 THE WALL SEPARATION RATING. THIS CREATES IN ESSENCE.
 TWO OCCUPANCIES. ONE ASSEMBLY (THE ORIGINAL SPACE) AND
 ONE MERCANTILE(THE NEW SPACE, ASSEMBLY UNDER 50) PER
 THE FFPC, AND ONE EXIT IS ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE THE EXIT
 SIGN FROM THE NEW SSPACE. THE NEW RATED DOOR WOULD
 SWING INTO THE NEW SPACE AND WOULD BE THE 2ND EXIT FROM
 THAT ORIGINAL AREA.
  
  
 2) REMOVE THE EXIT SIGN FROM THE NEW SPACE AND REPLACE
 THE FRONT DOOR. TWO EXITS WOULD BE FROM EACH SPACE.
  
  
 RESPECTFULLY,
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved