Date |
Text |
2019-03-28 13:55:08 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| CHECKLIST. |
| CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| NOTE: |
| BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME |
| OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| ISSUANCE. |
| |
| |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 1- REVISE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWN ON SHEET C-1. BASED ON |
| THE GRADE ELEVATIONS ON THE REAR OF THE LOT, IT LOOKS |
| LIKE THE WATER IS BEING DIVERTED TO THE NEIGHBOR. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED SO WATER IS KEPT WITHIN THE LOT OR |
| DIVERTED TO AN APPROVED COLLECTION POINT. |
| |
| FBC R 401.3 (DRAINAGE) |
| FBC 107.2.5 (SITE PLAN) |
| FBC 110.9 (IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION) |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT (TWO TIMES). NO ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| REVISED DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWS SECTION C-C WHICH SHOWS A |
| BERM WITH ONE OF THE SLOPES TOWARDS THE REAR PROPERTY. |
| THEREFORE, DIVERTING THE WATER TOWARD THE REAR REAR |
| PROPERTY. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 2- OK |
| |
| 3- OK. |
| |
| 4- OK |
| |
| 5- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| INCLUDING OWNER'S NAME. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT (TWO TIMES). NO ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| PARTIALLY COMPLIED. PROVIDE CORRECT NAME OF CONTRACTOR. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| B)ITEM #5 ON PAGE 1 OF 5 STATES THAT THIS IS NOT A |
| WORST CASE SCENARIO BUT ON PAGE 2 OF 5 IT SHOWS THAT |
| THE HOUSE WAS ROTATED 315 DEGREES. THIS IS |
| CONTRADICTORY. THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE DONE |
| FOR THE ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT (THREE TIMES). NO ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| C)PROVIDE WINDOWS AND DOORS DOCUMENTATION FROM |
| MANUFACTURER SHOWING THE SHGC FACTOR AND U-FACTOR |
| EFFICIENCIES SHOWN ON ITEM #7 ON PAGE 1 OF 5. SEC. |
| R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. NOTE: THIS IS ONLY |
| REQUIRED WHEN PERSON DOING THE CALCULATIONS IS NOT |
| USING THE PROGRAM DEFAULT FACTORS. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT (THREE TIMES). NO ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| D) CEILING R-VALUE INSULATION ON ITEM #10 DOESN'T MATCH |
| PLANS. REVISE AS REQUITED TO MATCH. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT (THREE TIMES). NO ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. ALSO, THE ATTIC IS NOT |
| VENTED. PLANS SPECIFY FOAM INSULATION. SEE PLANS AND |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| E) PROVIDE THE NAME OF PERSON PERFORMING THE ANALYSIS |
| AND GENERATING THE REPORT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| R405.4.2.1 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT (THREE TIMES). NO ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| |
| F) PARTIALLY DONE. THE VENT RATIO WAS REVISED, BUT I |
| APOLOGIZE BECAUSE THIS ITEM WAS OVERLOOKED. THERE IS NO |
| VENTED ATTIC. SEE ITEM #5D ABOVE. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT (TWO TIMES). NO ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| G) REVISE WINDOWS ORIENTATION AND AREA ON PAGE 3 OF 5 |
| TO MATCH ACTUAL ORIENTATION AND AREA SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #5(B) ABOVE. SEC. |
| R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT (THREE TIMES). NO ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| REPEAT COMMENT. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #5(B) ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| NOTE: |
| LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND |
| SHGC FACTOR IS REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| ARE NOT USING THE DEFAULT FACTOR. |
| |
| 6- OK. |
| |
| 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| SUBMITTAL). |
| |
| A) PRECAST LINTELS. NOTE: NOA 16-0126.03 SPECIFIED ON |
| SHEET 3 OF 7 IS EXPIRED. REVISE AS REQUIRED ALSO. THERE |
| IS NO NEED TO SPECIFY NOA ON DRAWINGS. JUST REVIEW IN |
| WRITING THE ACTUAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NO SUBMITTED AND NO WORD FROM |
| CONTRACTOR IF DEFERRED SUBMITTAL IS PREFERRED AT HIS |
| TIME. |
| |
| B) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. ONLY ONE COPY WAS |
| SUBMITTED AND WAS VOID. NEED TWO COPIES. ALSO REQUIRED: |
| CLEARLY SPECIFY MULLION SIZE TO BE USED TO VERIFY |
| COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NO ADDRESSED. AND NO WORD FROM |
| CONTRACTOR IF DEFERRED SUBMITTAL IS PREFERRED AT HIS |
| TIME. |
| |
| C)GARAGE DOOR FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED. DOOR |
| DOESN'T MEET THE POSITIVE DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATED |
| BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. PROVIDE DOOR THAT MEETS THE |
| CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NO SUBMITTED AND NO WORD FROM |
| CONTRACTOR IF DEFERRED SUBMITTAL IS PREFERRED AT HIS |
| TIME. |
| |
| |
| NOTE- |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 8- OK. |
| |
| 9- OK. |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT |
| CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE |
| PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS . SUBMIT OLD |
| DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR REFERENCE. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |
| |