Date |
Text |
2018-12-03 14:57:02 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1) SHEET A 1 - THERE IS AN INDICATION OF A LAB; |
| HOWEVER, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF WHAT THIS LAB IS |
| BEING USED FOR. |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL INFORMATION OF THE TYPE OF WORK |
| PERFORMED WITHIN THIS LAB.. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2) SHEET CS 1 - THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF SEPARATE |
| OCCUPANCY LOADS; HOWEVER, THERE IS NO OCCUPANCY |
| CLASSIFICATION PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AND WHETHER |
| IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED. (IT APPEARS TO BE SPEPARATED |
| ON SHEET A 1, NEED FOR CLARIFICATION PURPOSES) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 3) SHEET A 1 - THERE IS AN INDICATION OF OVEN WITHIN |
| THE LAB ROOM. THERE IS NO INDICATION OF WHAT THIS OVEN |
| IS USED FOR AND OR ANY VENTING REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS. |
| |
| ANY PROPOSED VENTING SHALL BE PER NFPA 96 AND UNDER |
| SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS. PROVIDE AN APPLICABLE NOTE. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 4) SHEET A 1 - 1 HOUR FIRE WALLS ARE INDICATED AROUND |
| THE LAB ROOM. PER # 2 ABOVE WHAT IS THE REQUIRED RATING |
| OF THE SEPARATION OF OCCUPANCIES. IT MAY BE 2 HOURS. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT OR JUSTIFY WITH APPLICABLE |
| FIRE CODE REFERNECES. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 5) SHEET A 1 - C2 RATED WALLS ARE INDICATED AROUND THE |
| LAB, HOWEVER, AT THE BATHROOM AREA THE RATING STOPS AT |
| THE DOOR EXPOSING THE INTERIOR OF THE BATHROOMS TO THE |
| HAZARD. |
| |
| THE BATHROOM WALLS ARE REQUIRED TO BE HAVE THIS RATING. |
| FOR DISSCUSSION PURPOSES, THE OUTSIDE BATHROOM WALLS |
| INCLUDING THE DOORS WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO BE RATED. |
| THE RATING WOULD STOP AT THE WALLS DIRECTLY IN CONTACT |
| WITH THE LAB. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. |
| |
| |
| |
| 6) SHEET A 1 - THERE IS AN INDICATION OF B2 WALLS (BY |
| DOOR 21) THAT APPEAR TO REQUIRE C2 RATINGS. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT OR JUSTIFY WITH FIRE CODE |
| REFERENCES. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 7) SHEET A 1 - THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF B WALLS AROUND |
| THE ELECTRIC ROOM. THERE IS NO CALL OUT FOR B WALLS. IN |
| ADDITION, THERE WALLS APPEAR TO REQUIRE C2 RATINGS. |
| |
| PLEASE REIVEW AND CORRECT OR JUSTIFY WILL FIRE CODE |
| REFERENCES. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 8) SHEET A 2 - THE DOOR SCHEDULE HAS INDICATIONS OF C |
| LABELS. |
| |
| FOR CLARIFICATION PURPOSES PLEASE PROVIDE FIRE RATING |
| TIME FOR THESE DOORS PER THE FFPC AND ENSURE THE ARE IN |
| COMPLIANCE WITH ANY CHANGES TO # 2 & 4. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 9) SHEET E 2 - THERE ARE TWO (2) EXITS INDICATED FOR |
| THE LAB AREA. BASED ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF THIS |
| OCCUPANCY AND BEING SEPARATED FOR THE OTHER |
| OCCUOPANCIES, THESE TWO (2) EXITS MAY BE REQUIRED PER |
| THE FFPC TO BE SEPARATED BY 1/2 THE DIAGONAL OF THE |
| SPACE SERVED. |
| |
| THESE EXITS APPEAR TO TOO CLOSE TO EACH OTHER TO MEET |
| THIS REQUIREMENT. |
| |
| PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, |
| |
| 7.5.1.3.2* WHERE TWO EXITS, EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT |
| DISCHARGES ARE |
| REQUIRED, THEY SHALL BE LOCATED AT A DISTANCE FROM ONE |
| ANOTHER NOT |
| LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE LENGTH OF THE MAXIMUM OVERALL |
| DIAGONAL |
| DIMENSION OF THE BUILDING OR AREA TO BE SERVED, |
| MEASURED IN A |
| STRAIGHT LINE BETWEEN THE NEAREST EDGE OF THE EXITS, |
| EXIT ACCESSES, OR |
| EXIT DISCHARGES, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN 7.5.1.3.3 |
| THROUGH |
| 7.5.1.3.5.. |
| |
| |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW THE OCCUPANCY OF THE LAS PER THE FFPC AND |
| THE REQUIRED EIXTING AND CORRECT IF APPLICABLE. |
| |
| |
| |
| 10) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| 11) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| PETER LEDUC |
| FIRE MARSHAL |
| 561-804-4709 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |