Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 18110758
Permit Number 18110758
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2019-01-15 16:49:4201/17/19 TALKED TO DAVID PORTER (ARCH) TO GO OVER
 DRAINAGE COMMENTS. HE SAID SITE PLAN IS CORRECT. SURVEY
 NEEDS TO BE REVISED BECAUSE THERE IS AN EASEMENT ON THE
 SOUTH SIDE FOR CITY USE. JG.
  
  
 01/15/19 REVISED COMMENTS.
  
  
 NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), BUILDING REVIEW
 CHECKLIST.
 CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 1- SHEET AS-1 SITE PLAN SUBMITTED:
 A) REVISE DRAINAGE SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THE SITE
 PLAN. SETBACKS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AT THE SOUTH
 BOUNDARY DON'T MATCH SURVEY SUBMITTED. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 B)DRIVEWAY SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN DOESN'T MATCH
 DRIVEWAY SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SUBMITTED. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
  
 2- PROVIDE SURVEY WITH SURVEYORS ORIGINAL SEAL AND
 SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 472 F.S. OR SUBMIT
 SURVEY WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE.
  
 3- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS:
 A)WALL INSULATION DOESN'T MATCH PLANS.
  
 B)PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE OWNER. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 C) PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE PERSON PERFORMING THE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R405.4.2.1
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 D) IT LOOKS LIKE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE (10 PEOPLE) IS
 NOT CORRECT AND IS A LITTLE BIT HIGH FOR A SINGLE
 FAMILY RESIDENCE OF 4 BEDROOMS. REVISE THE NUMBER OF
 OCCUPANTS OR PROVIDE JUSTIFICATIONS OF WHY CONSIDERING
 10 PEOPLE IN THESE CALCULATIONS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 E) EXTERIOR DOORS ORIENTATION DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. EVEN
 IF DOING CALCULATIONS FOR WORST CASE SCENARIO. REVISE
 AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
 (NOTE: ENERGY CALCULATIONS MAY BE DONE FOR WORST CASE
 SCENARIO WHEN BUILDING A MODEL ON MULTIPLE
 ORIENTATIONS. CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT DONE FOR
 WORST CASE SCENARIO. THEREFORE, IT NEEDS TO-MATCH THE
 ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING).
  
 F)WINDOWS INFORMATION IS INCORRECT. REVISE THE WINDOW
 ORIENTATION (WORST CASE SCENARIO?), WINDOW AREA AND
 WINDOW OVERHANG SEPARATION TO MATCH PLANS. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 G) PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S INFORMATION SHOWING THE
 WINDOWS EFFICIENCIES SPECIFIED ON THE FIRST PAGE OF THE
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.3
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 NOTE:
 LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE SHGC FACTOR
 SPECIFIED IN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED
 FOR INSPECTION.
  
 4- UNABLE TO SEE SOIL TEST REPORT. IT WAS NOT UPLOADED.
 PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT. SEC. R401.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 5- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION WAS
 UPDATED TO $179,082 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY
 AMENDMENTS. THE PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $1,734.60.
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT
 CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS.
 PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS
 FOR REFERENCE.
  
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved