Date |
Text |
2019-01-15 16:49:42 | 01/17/19 TALKED TO DAVID PORTER (ARCH) TO GO OVER |
| DRAINAGE COMMENTS. HE SAID SITE PLAN IS CORRECT. SURVEY |
| NEEDS TO BE REVISED BECAUSE THERE IS AN EASEMENT ON THE |
| SOUTH SIDE FOR CITY USE. JG. |
| |
| |
| 01/15/19 REVISED COMMENTS. |
| |
| |
| NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), BUILDING REVIEW |
| CHECKLIST. |
| CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 1- SHEET AS-1 SITE PLAN SUBMITTED: |
| A) REVISE DRAINAGE SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THE SITE |
| PLAN. SETBACKS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AT THE SOUTH |
| BOUNDARY DON'T MATCH SURVEY SUBMITTED. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| B)DRIVEWAY SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN DOESN'T MATCH |
| DRIVEWAY SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SUBMITTED. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| |
| 2- PROVIDE SURVEY WITH SURVEYORS ORIGINAL SEAL AND |
| SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 472 F.S. OR SUBMIT |
| SURVEY WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE. |
| |
| 3- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| A)WALL INSULATION DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. |
| |
| B)PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE OWNER. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| C) PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE PERSON PERFORMING THE ENERGY |
| CALCULATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R405.4.2.1 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| D) IT LOOKS LIKE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE (10 PEOPLE) IS |
| NOT CORRECT AND IS A LITTLE BIT HIGH FOR A SINGLE |
| FAMILY RESIDENCE OF 4 BEDROOMS. REVISE THE NUMBER OF |
| OCCUPANTS OR PROVIDE JUSTIFICATIONS OF WHY CONSIDERING |
| 10 PEOPLE IN THESE CALCULATIONS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| E) EXTERIOR DOORS ORIENTATION DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. EVEN |
| IF DOING CALCULATIONS FOR WORST CASE SCENARIO. REVISE |
| AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| (NOTE: ENERGY CALCULATIONS MAY BE DONE FOR WORST CASE |
| SCENARIO WHEN BUILDING A MODEL ON MULTIPLE |
| ORIENTATIONS. CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT DONE FOR |
| WORST CASE SCENARIO. THEREFORE, IT NEEDS TO-MATCH THE |
| ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING). |
| |
| F)WINDOWS INFORMATION IS INCORRECT. REVISE THE WINDOW |
| ORIENTATION (WORST CASE SCENARIO?), WINDOW AREA AND |
| WINDOW OVERHANG SEPARATION TO MATCH PLANS. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| G) PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S INFORMATION SHOWING THE |
| WINDOWS EFFICIENCIES SPECIFIED ON THE FIRST PAGE OF THE |
| ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.3 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| NOTE: |
| LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE SHGC FACTOR |
| SPECIFIED IN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED |
| FOR INSPECTION. |
| |
| 4- UNABLE TO SEE SOIL TEST REPORT. IT WAS NOT UPLOADED. |
| PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT. SEC. R401.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| 5- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION WAS |
| UPDATED TO $179,082 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. THE PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $1,734.60. |
| |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT |
| CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE |
| PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS |
| FOR REFERENCE. |
| |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |