| Date |
Text |
| 2018-11-16 19:17:51 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1) THIS ONE STORY STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE |
| | CATEGORY D. THE REQUIRED UPLIFT PRESSURE FOR THE FLAT |
| | ROOF IS -116 PSF FOR ROOF ZONE 3 FOR A STRUCTURE WITH A |
| | 15 FT. MEAN ROOF HEIGHT EXCEEDS THE -97.5 PSF FOR |
| | SYSTEM NO. W-19 THAT WAS SELECTED FROM FL16027-R2. |
| | SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT MEET THE REQUIRED UPLIFT. |
| | FBC-R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NEW FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY W-5 DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES EITHER. DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | ARE EVEN LOWER THAN THE ASSEMBLY SELECTED ON THE FIRST |
| | SUBMITTAL. NEED TO SELECT ASSEMBLY THAT MEETS THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES. NOTE: BONDED |
| | ASSEMBLIES DON'T ALLOW RATIONAL ANALYSIS (RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL ENHANCEMENT). SEE NOTE #10 ON |
| | PAGE 2 OF 26 OF PRODUCT APPROVAL FL16027-R2 SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2) THE UNDERLAYMENT AND CAP SHEET SPECIFIED ON PAGE 4 |
| | OF ROOFING FORM 100, DO NOT MATCH THE ONES THAT WERE |
| | MARKED ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FL16027. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT CLEAR. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | WHAT'S CAP SHEET SA-P? AND WHAT'S OTHER UNDERLAYMENT |
| | SA-V ?. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
