Date |
Text |
2018-12-03 11:48:23 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| |
| |
| 1) THE SUBMITTED PLAN SHEETS ARE TOO SMALL AND |
| UNREADABLE AND AS A RESULT AN OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW CAN |
| NOT BE COMPLETED WITH ANY ACCURACY OR CONFIDENCE. |
| |
| PLEASE ENLARGE AND RESUBMIT |
| |
| |
| 2ND RESPONSE: |
| |
| THE PLANS REMIAN TOO SMALL. IN ADDITION, ONLY ONE SHEET |
| WAS SUBMITTED. A MINIMUM OF TWO PLAN SHEETS ARE |
| REQUIRED. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2) A SCOPE OR WORK COULD NOT BE IDENTIFIED. IS THIS A |
| FIRE LINE ASSEMBLY? IS IT A NEW INSTALL? IS THIS A |
| RELOCATION? |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE SPECIFIC DETAILS AND SCOPE OF |
| WORK. |
| |
| |
| |
| 2ND RESPONSE: |
| |
| THE STATED RESPONSE DOES NOT INDICATE IF THIS IS JUST A |
| DOCV. IF NEW FIRE LINE IS PROPOSED WITH THE DOCV, HOW |
| LONG IS IT AND PROVIDE THE APPLICABLE SPECIFICATION |
| SHEETS. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 3) THERE ARE NO INDICATIONS OF COMPLIANCE WITH NFPA 24 |
| STANDARD FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE |
| MAINS AND THEIR APPURTENANCES 2013 EDITION, IF |
| APPLICABLE PER # 2. |
| |
| PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| |
| 6.5 BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLIES. |
| 6.5.1 WHERE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 6.2.11(4), BACKFLOW |
| PREVENTION |
| ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR |
| INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. |
| 6.5.2 WHERE BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLIES ARE USED, |
| THEY |
| SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST MECHANICAL DAMAGE WHERE |
| NEEDED. |
| |
| 6.2.11 ALL CONNECTIONS TO PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE MAINS |
| FOR FIRE |
| PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHALL BE ARRANGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| ONE |
| OF THE FOLLOWING SO THAT THEY CAN BE ISOLATED: |
| (1)*A POST INDICATOR VALVE INSTALLED NOT LESS THAN 40 |
| FT (12 M) |
| FROM THE BUILDING |
| (A) FOR BUILDINGS LESS THAN 40 FT (12 M) IN HEIGHT, A |
| POST |
| INDICATOR VALVE SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE INSTALLED |
| CLOSER THAN 40 FT (12 M) BUT AT LEAST AS FAR FROM THE |
| BUILDING AS THE HEIGHT OF THE WALL FACING THE POST |
| INDICATOR |
| VALVE. |
| (2) A WALL POST INDICATOR VALVE |
| (3) AN INDICATING VALVE IN A PIT, INSTALLED IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH |
| SECTION 6.4 |
| (4)*A BACKFLOW PREVENTER WITH AT LEAST ONE INDICATING |
| VALVE NOT |
| LESS THAN 40 FT (12 M) FROM THE BUILDING |
| (A) FOR BUILDINGS LESS THAN 40 FT (12 M) IN HEIGHT, A |
| BACKFLOW |
| PREVENTER WITH AT LEAST ONE INDICATING VALVE SHALL |
| BE PERMITTED TO BE INSTALLED CLOSER THAN 40 FT (12 M) |
| BUT AT LEAST AS FAR FROM THE BUILDING AS THE HEIGHT OF |
| THE WALL FACING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE AN APPLICABLE NOTE OF |
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 2ND RESPONSE: |
| |
| THE EXISITNG BOLLARDS COMMENT IS ACCEPTED. |
| |
| UNDER SECTION (4) (A) A 4"GATE VALVE IS INSTALLED DOES |
| NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF THIS CODE. |
| |
| THE PROPOSED DOCV AS WELL A THE GATE VALVE IS CLOSER |
| THAN 40' FROM THE BUILDING BUT STILL REMIANS WITHIN THE |
| HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING. IN ADDITION THERE ARE NO SPEC |
| SHEETS FOR THE GATE VALVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| 5) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| PETER LEDUC |
| FIRE MARSHAL |
| 561-804-4709 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |