| Date |
Text |
| 2018-10-23 17:34:32 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF THIRD SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ?WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS? |
| | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- FLAT ROOF RAS 117 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR CORNER AREAS IS INCORRECT. THE |
| | SPECIFIED DESIGN-PRESSURES ARE -132.6 PSF BUT MAX. |
| | FASTENER SPACING CALCULATIONS ARE DONE FOR 110.7 PSF. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. REVISE NUMBER OF REQUIRED ROWS |
| | ACCORDINGLY. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THE CALCULATIONS WERE REVISED, BUT THE BASE SHEET |
| | FASTENING INFORMATION WAS NOT REVISED. THE NUMBER OF |
| | ROWS NEED TO BE REVISED ALSO. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
