| Date |
Text |
| 2019-06-26 09:46:25 | 09/18/19 MET WITH RONEN HAZAN (OWNER),DANIEL ACEVEDO |
| | (CONTRACTOR), JOHN FRASCA (CODE ENFORCEMENT) TO GO OVER |
| | COMMENTS. JG. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | RESIDENTIAL (R3) FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS |
| | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- SHEET S-01: |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE |
| | HOUR FIRE RATED FLOOR ASSEMBLY SEPARATING DUPLEX A AND |
| | B. |
| | SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND SEC. R302.3 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. DETAIL FOR 1 HOUR FLOOR ASSEMBLY AND |
| | INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE BUILDING SECTION FOR THE |
| | FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY ON SAME SHEET DON'T MATCH. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. THERE IS NO COORDINATION |
| | BETWEEN 1 HOUR FLOOR ASSEMBLY NO L501 AND INFORMATION |
| | SHOWN ON THE WALL SECTION ON SAME SHEET. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE APPROVED |
| | FLOOR /CEILING FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY. SPECIFY ALL |
| | FINISHES, INCLUDING THE FINISH FLOOR. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | ENGINEER IS NOT PROVIDING A COMPLETE DRAWING OF THE 1 |
| | HOUR APPROVED FLOOR/CEILING FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY. |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE UL L501 APPROVED ASSEMBLY DETAIL THAT |
| | MATCHES PROPOSED INSTALLATION. SPECIFY THICKNESS OF |
| | MATERIALS, FASTENING SPECIFICATIONS, ETC. TYPICALLY |
| | THIS IS DONE BY COPYING THE DETAILS FROM THE UL |
| | WEBSITE. |
| | |
| | 2- WINDOW REPLACEMENT : |
| | A) CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS |
| | AND TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED WINDOWS TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 702.5 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. EGRESS NOTE ON SHEET A-01 DOESN'T |
| | ADDRESS THE COMMENT. THIS NOTE DOESN'T ANSWER WHAT IT |
| | WAS REQUESTED. PLEASE READ THE COMMENT AGAIN AND |
| | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. ALSO, IT LOOKS LIKE |
| | THE CODE SECTION IS TAKING FROM ANOTHER CODE OTHER THAN |
| | THE 2017 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. IN ADDITION, THE WINDOW SIZES |
| | SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED WINDOW SCHEDULE DON'T COMPLY. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | A) EXTERIOR DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOTE: PROVIDE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPOND TO |
| | DRAWINGS MA-FL0211-17 SUBMITTEDD. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE WAS |
| | NOT PROVIDED. NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL, INCLUDING THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER |
| | PAGE THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BECAUSE IT SHOWS |
| | IF PRODUCT IS APPROVED AND CURRENT CODE IN EFFECT. |
| | NOTE: IF THERE IS NOT CURRENT FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL, |
| | THEN MANUFACTURER MAY APPLY FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | 2 COPIES OF COMPLETE ENGINEERED PACKAGE WITH ORIGINAL |
| | SEAL/SIGNATURE ALONG WITH APPLICATION FOR PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL |
| | REVIEW/APPROVAL PROCESS. |
| | |
| | 4- RAFTER CONNECTION DETAIL ON SHEET S-01. ENGINEER TO |
| | PROVIDE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT THE |
| | SPECIFIED CONNECTION IS ADEQUATE FOR THE SUPPORT OF |
| | SECOND FLOOR JOISTS. ENGINEER TO SHOW THAT 1/4" X |
| | 3-1/4" TAPCONS SPACED AT 24" O.C ARE ADEQUATE TO CARRY |
| | ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5- SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED ON A SEPARATE LETTER BY THE |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE REPAIR OF RAFTERS IN MAIN |
| | HOUSE DON'T MATCH DETAILS SHOWN ON THE STRUCTURAL |
| | DRAWINGS. ENGINEER TO COORDINATE AND PROVIDE ALL THE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS ON THE STRUCTURAL PLANS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS |
| | REGARDING THE COMMENTS AND PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO AVOID ANY PLAN REVIEW FEES |
| | AND TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE |
| | SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED |
| | SHEETS. PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
