| Date |
Text |
| 2019-02-21 18:12:18 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS |
| | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- SHEET S-01: |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE |
| | HOUR FIRE RATED FLOOR ASSEMBLY SEPARATING DUPLEX A AND |
| | B. |
| | SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND SEC. R302.3 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) CLARIFY WHY PROVIDING ONE HOUR FIRE RATED DEMISING |
| | PARTITION ON THESE SHEET. THERE ARE NO DEMISING |
| | PARTITIONS BETWEEN DWELLING UNITS. THE REQUIRED FIRE |
| | RATING SEPARATION IS LOCATED ON THE FLOOR/CEILING |
| | ASSEMBLY. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1(A) ABOVE. PROVIDE |
| | WALL DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS THAT SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY PENETRATIONS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R302.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT. |
| | 2- ROOF TRUSS REPAIR DETAILS ON SHEET S-02 ARE |
| | INCOMPLETE. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | A)SPECIFY NAIL TYPE AND HOW LONG ARE THE 2X4'S THAT ARE |
| | SISTERED TO THE TRUSSES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) SPECIFY WHICH CONNECTOR IS GOING TO BE USED FOR THE |
| | ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. DETAILS ARE KEYED WITH SOME CONNECTORS, |
| | BUT THERE IS NOT CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) NEW SHEET S-02 WAS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 471. F.S. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- FLAT ROOF REPAIR DETAIL ON SHEET S-02 IS NOT CLEAR |
| | AND DOESN'T MATCH FRAMING PLAN SHOWN ON SAME SHEET. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. ALSO, WHERE IS DETAIL 3 |
| | S-01? SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A)REPEAT COMMENT. THIS DETAIL WAS REDUCED AND PLACED |
| | UNDER THE ROOF TRUSS REPAIR DETAIL BOX BELOW. NOW THERE |
| | IS MORE CONFUSION OF WHAT DETAIL APPLIES TO. ALSO, IT' |
| | TOO SMALL AND IS NOT LEGIBLE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS ANS SPECIFICATIONS THAT APPLY |
| | TO THIS JOB. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | B) NEW FLAT ROOF SECTION DETAIL DOESN'T MATCH FLAT ROOF |
| | PLAN. AND, (1)ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPECIFICATIONS IS |
| | NOT CLEAR. (2)PLYWOOD PANEL SIZE AND NAILING PATTERN |
| | DON'T SEEM TO MATCH LOCATION OF ROOF STRUCTURAL FRAMING |
| | MEMBERS. (3)SPECIFY ROOF SHEATHING NAIL TYPE. |
| | (4)CLARIFY HOW 4" X 20" @ 4' ROOF VENTS WILL PROVIDE |
| | CROSS VENTILATION ON A FLAT ROOF IF THERE IS NOT AIR |
| | SPACE IN BETWEEN THE ROOFING JOISTS TO ALLOW FOR CROSS |
| | VENTILATION?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- DOORS AND WINDOWS CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN |
| | ON SHEET A-01 ARE THE SAME FOR ALL OPENINGS. DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES SEEM TOO LOW FOR SOME OPENINGS. BASED ON THE |
| | ACTUAL OPENING EFFECTIVE AREA, WALL ZONE AND MEAN ROOF |
| | HEIGHT. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH |
| | OPENING OR PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR WORST CASED |
| | SCENARIO THAT WILL COVER ALL OPENINGS. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 4(A)- REVISED SHEET A-01 WAS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY |
| | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 471. F.S. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- WINDOW REPLACEMENT : |
| | A)CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS AND |
| | TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED WINDOWS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 702.5 FBC-EXISTING |
| | BUILDING. |
| | NOTE: NEED TO VERIFY MANUFACTURER'S LARGEST STANDARD |
| | SIZE WINDOW THAT WILL FIT WITHIN THE EXISTING FRAME OR |
| | EXISTING ROUGH OPENING AND THAT WILL NOT REDUCE THE |
| | EGRESS SIZE OPENING OF EXISTING WINDOW AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 702.5. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | B) OK. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) EXTERIOR DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOTE: PROVIDE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPOND TO |
| | DRAWINGS MA-FL0211-17 SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. REQUIRED: CLEARLY |
| | SPECIFY MULLION SIZE TO BE USED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C) FLAT ROOF NOA 16-0517.08. PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION |
| | #7 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA TO MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES AT |
| | ALL ROOF ZONES. |
| | SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 7- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | |
| | 8- PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR |
| | REVISED MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS |
| | REGARDING THE COMMENTS AND PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO AVOID ANY PLAN REVIEW FEES |
| | AND TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE |
| | SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED |
| | SHEETS. PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
